|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> As I say, as far as I can tell, nobody was upset with him, they just
>> wanted to reduce the payroll bill...
>
> There may well have been something going on that just wasn't apparent
> from that far away.
This is also entirely possible.
> This could be a good thing for you. :-)
Well... my boss is now the Director of Finance. (The Director of IT used
to report directly to him. Now the whole IT group reports directly to
him.) He knows nothing about computers. (I've met him in meatspace.
Trust me, he knows *nothing* about computers!) And he knows even less
about how to operate a computer system in the minefield of government
regulations. (But then, the Director of IT didn't really grok that fully
either - much to my dismay.)
So it's probably going to be quite quiet around here for a while. I
imagine now all the various IT people will crawl back into their
seperate little holes and just do their own thing independently - like
they did before we hired this guy...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message
news:4b67b828$1@news.povray.org...
> But I always have tried to make myself available; I can
think of one
> exception, but I was asked to leave that job (and was glad
to just get
> the hell out).-- Jim
I went back to one job (for free) and identified an error
made by a machine shop who mis-read my blueprints... and the
day after Christmas! I'm a sucker...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:13:24 -0800, DungBeatle wrote:
> I went back to one job (for free) and identified an error made by a
> machine shop who mis-read my blueprints... and the day after Christmas!
> I'm a sucker...
But something like that does tend to come through in future references as
well. It shows that you have a sense of ownership for things you've
done, and are willing to share information as needed.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:34:34 +0000, Invisible wrote:
>>> As I say, as far as I can tell, nobody was upset with him, they just
>>> wanted to reduce the payroll bill...
>>
>> There may well have been something going on that just wasn't apparent
>> from that far away.
>
> This is also entirely possible.
I've seen some strange things happen that have gotten people fired, even
people who were good at their jobs. It happens.
>> This could be a good thing for you. :-)
>
> Well... my boss is now the Director of Finance. (The Director of IT used
> to report directly to him. Now the whole IT group reports directly to
> him.) He knows nothing about computers. (I've met him in meatspace.
> Trust me, he knows *nothing* about computers!) And he knows even less
> about how to operate a computer system in the minefield of government
> regulations. (But then, the Director of IT didn't really grok that fully
> either - much to my dismay.)
>
> So it's probably going to be quite quiet around here for a while. I
> imagine now all the various IT people will crawl back into their
> seperate little holes and just do their own thing independently - like
> they did before we hired this guy...
Quiet is good - maybe a good time to also arrange to introduce yourself
to the finance director and outline what it is you've been having
difficulty with. Get on his good side early. Don't bury him under
technobabble - you understand him as an audience already, so leverage
that in your conversations with him.
In particular, I'd focus on the regulatory compliance issues - that's
something finance guys understand very well and could be a common ground
for conversation between you and him. I'm thinking about things like the
system changes that go undocumented because the IT guys in the US don't
consult you about those changes; your lack of access to some necessary
systems, things like that.
Take it slowly, but make sure he knows who you are and what your
responsibilities are with regards to these audits. This could be a very
good thing for you.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> Quiet is good - maybe a good time to also arrange to introduce yourself
> to the finance director and outline what it is you've been having
> difficulty with. Get on his good side early. Don't bury him under
> technobabble - you understand him as an audience already, so leverage
> that in your conversations with him.
>
> In particular, I'd focus on the regulatory compliance issues - that's
> something finance guys understand very well and could be a common ground
> for conversation between you and him. I'm thinking about things like the
> system changes that go undocumented because the IT guys in the US don't
> consult you about those changes; your lack of access to some necessary
> systems, things like that.
>
> Take it slowly, but make sure he knows who you are and what your
> responsibilities are with regards to these audits. This could be a very
> good thing for you.
You give some good advice - but I'm far more focused on getting out of
this job and into a real one. Once I've left this company, its petty
politics won't matter any more. (I'll have a whole new set of power
battles to lose! Yay, me...)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:55:30 +0000, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> You give some good advice - but I'm far more focused on getting out of
> this job and into a real one. Once I've left this company, its petty
> politics won't matter any more. (I'll have a whole new set of power
> battles to lose! Yay, me...)
It never hurts to do a little but of both - absolutely keep focus on
getting out, but if you can part on good terms, then the new finance
director can be a good reference for you down the road - and since his
area involves government compliance and you have expertise in that area,
having him as a reference in the future might be useful down the road.
The petty politics won't matter, but the reference could end up being
worth its weight in gold. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> The petty politics won't matter, but the reference could end up being
> worth its weight in gold. :-)
How much does a reference weigh...? :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:52:59 -0300, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> The petty politics won't matter, but the reference could end up being
>> worth its weight in gold. :-)
>
> How much does a reference weigh...? :)
If it gets the job, as much as the salary increase that comes with the
new job. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Oh... my god.
>
> OK, so yesterday I was bouncing emails back and forth with my boss over
> in America. This afternoon there was supposed to be another long boring
> IT meeting over the phone. (But for once there's something actually
> worth discussing.)
>
> And five minutes ago, I got a phone call telling my that... my boss...
> no longer works for this company. O_O
...and yesterday, a member of the IT team UNEXPECTEDLY DIED! O_O
First our Cisco specialist moves to a better job. Then our IT Director
is summarily dismissed. And then SOMEBODY DIED. Who'll be next?!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> Who'll be next?!
Who do you think?
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |