 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Look up "reverse Polish list".
>
> Or Reverse Polish Notation.
Actually, DJ used to refer to it as "Polish reversed lists", but
whatever. ;-)
Man, if it weren't for that guy, *I* wouldn't understand this joke either...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:52:16 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
>>> Look up "reverse Polish list".
>>
>> Or Reverse Polish Notation.
>
>Actually, DJ used to refer to it as "Polish reversed lists", but
>whatever. ;-)
>
DJ??
>Man, if it weren't for that guy, *I* wouldn't understand this joke either...
It is not very common
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Roman Reiner wrote:
>
>> I don't get it :/
>
> Look up "reverse Polish list".
I've always heard it as reverse polish LISP...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
>>> Look up "reverse Polish list".
>>
>> Or Reverse Polish Notation.
>
> Actually, DJ used to refer to it as "Polish reversed lists", but
> whatever. ;-)
>
> Man, if it weren't for that guy, *I* wouldn't understand this joke
> either...
Who's DJ? Also, I think reverse polish notation is the correct name for
the postfix method of operator placement, and reverse polish LISP is
rather the name for the programming language on HP calculators which
used this notation (the calculators are stack-based).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:08:50 -0700, Kevin Wampler <wam### [at] uwashingtonedu>
wrote:
>Invisible wrote:
>> Roman Reiner wrote:
>>
>>> I don't get it :/
>>
>> Look up "reverse Polish list".
>
>I've always heard it as reverse polish LISP...
LISP is something new?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Actually, DJ used to refer to it as "Polish reversed lists", but
>> whatever. ;-)
>
> DJ??
David Jones. (Yes, that was his name.) Today we'd probably all call him
Davy Jones. Which would probably puzzle the hell out of him.
He was one of the lecturers at college. If you want to know about the
binomial theorum, or Dikjstra's shunting algorithm, or DeMorgan's
theorum, or the vector cross product, this guy can tell you everything
it is humanly possible to know, and how to apply it to any imaginable
mathematical problem. Try to explain to him that you're taking down the
B/W posters to replace them with colour versions of the same posters,
and he looks at you like "wait... what?" Very strange.
>> Man, if it weren't for that guy, *I* wouldn't understand this joke either...
>
> It is not very common
Possibly not. Unless - like me - you build expression parsers just for
giggles...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:07:25 +0100, Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> DJ??
>
>David Jones. (Yes, that was his name.) Today we'd probably all call him
>Davy Jones.
Or Bowie. I once met someone who knew him as Davie Jones.
>
>He was one of the lecturers at college. If you want to know about the
>binomial theorum, or Dikjstra's shunting algorithm, or DeMorgan's
>theorum, or the vector cross product, this guy can tell you everything
>it is humanly possible to know, and how to apply it to any imaginable
>mathematical problem. Try to explain to him that you're taking down the
>B/W posters to replace them with colour versions of the same posters,
>and he looks at you like "wait... what?" Very strange.
>
>>> Man, if it weren't for that guy, *I* wouldn't understand this joke either...
>>
>> It is not very common
>
>Possibly not. Unless - like me - you build expression parsers just for
>giggles...
Woosh LOL
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:08:50 -0700, Kevin Wampler <wam### [at] uwashingtonedu>
> wrote:
>
>> Invisible wrote:
>>> Roman Reiner wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't get it :/
>>> Look up "reverse Polish list".
>> I've always heard it as reverse polish LISP...
>
> LISP is something new?
Huh? No... but somehow I have the feeling that something's going over my
head here.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 11:22:15 -0700, Kevin Wampler <wam### [at] uwashingtonedu>
wrote:
>> LISP is something new?
>
>Huh? No... but somehow I have the feeling that something's going over my
>head here.
I'm joshing :P
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 schrieb:
> David Jones. (Yes, that was his name.) Today we'd probably all call him
> Davy Jones. Which would probably puzzle the hell out of him.
>
> He was one of the lecturers at college.
Wait - is that "David Jones" as in "David E.H. Jones", aka "Daedalus"?
When I was a kid, there was a kind of scientific quiz show on German TV
where a school class would compete with their (non-natural-science)
teachers to explain entertaining physical (or sometimes chemical)
experiments. That David Jones guy was a regular guest "experimentor" on
the show (spoke quite a good German, except for his notoriously hoarse
voice).
As "Daedalus", he also wrote about some "crazy" ideas that stuck in my
mind, such as the "anti-greenhouse".
> If you want to know about the
> binomial theorum, or Dikjstra's shunting algorithm, or DeMorgan's
> theorum, or the vector cross product, this guy can tell you everything
> it is humanly possible to know, and how to apply it to any imaginable
> mathematical problem. Try to explain to him that you're taking down the
> B/W posters to replace them with colour versions of the same posters,
> and he looks at you like "wait... what?" Very strange.
Could be that guy... an amazing "practical genius" if I'm asked.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
