POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Mysteries of the universe Server Time
5 Sep 2024 23:13:50 EDT (-0400)
  Mysteries of the universe (Message 154 to 163 of 223)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: Mike Raiford
Subject: Re: Mysteries of the universe
Date: 4 Sep 2009 13:19:47
Message: <4aa14c33@news.povray.org>
Warp wrote:

>   What I dislike about the movie is that it's a very good story and it makes
> a lot of sense, up until that craziness at the end. What I dislike about it
> is that the craziness at the end has *no* meaning at all. It's not like the
> writers came up with some kind of deep message and a highly abstract way of

What about the intro? That was, IIRC the only reference to the monolith 
in the entire movie ...

-- 
~Mike


Post a reply to this message

From: Doctor John
Subject: Re: Mysteries of the universe
Date: 4 Sep 2009 13:33:15
Message: <4aa14f5b@news.povray.org>
Darren New wrote:
> scott wrote:
>> pit-lane refuelling fires must have been fun!
> 
> Yes. THe official hand signal a driver uses to indicate he's on fire is
> to run around in circles waving his hands up and down over his head. :-)
> 
No, that's called panicking :-D

John
-- 
"Eppur si muove" - Galileo Galilei


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Mysteries of the universe
Date: 4 Sep 2009 14:23:08
Message: <4aa15b0c@news.povray.org>
Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
> Warp wrote:

> >   What I dislike about the movie is that it's a very good story and it makes
> > a lot of sense, up until that craziness at the end. What I dislike about it
> > is that the craziness at the end has *no* meaning at all. It's not like the
> > writers came up with some kind of deep message and a highly abstract way of

> What about the intro? That was, IIRC the only reference to the monolith 
> in the entire movie ...

   Some people say that they find the intro incomprehensible, or at least
very hard to understand. I don't know why. I find it quite easy to
understand.

  Two tribes of some pre-human species are having a squirmish about a pond
of water. Then the loser tribe is hanging around when the weird monolith
appears, and after touching it they start realizing that they could use
bones as weapons, and they take the pond back. Cue a transition from a
bone thrown into the air to a spaceship. Both tools of some kind. The
inference is rather clear.

-- 
                                                          - Warp


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Mysteries of the universe
Date: 4 Sep 2009 14:26:25
Message: <4aa15bd1$1@news.povray.org>
Warp wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>> It did end poorly. Indeed, it probably would have been more satisfying to 
>> just end it with "My god, it's full of stars", and cut out the bits after 
>> the pyrotechnics reflected in the helmet entirely.
> 
>   That line was actually not in the first movie at all. It was in the book,
> and it was put in the sequel movie.

I did not know that. :-)

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Mysteries of the universe
Date: 4 Sep 2009 14:27:08
Message: <4aa15bfc$1@news.povray.org>
Mike Raiford wrote:
> What about the intro? That was, IIRC the only reference to the monolith 
> in the entire movie ...

Huh? No. There's a monolith on the moon, and one on one of saturn's moons.

Maybe I'm just projecting the book into the movie, tho.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Mysteries of the universe
Date: 4 Sep 2009 14:28:00
Message: <4aa15c30$1@news.povray.org>
Doctor John wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
>> scott wrote:
>>> pit-lane refuelling fires must have been fun!
>> Yes. THe official hand signal a driver uses to indicate he's on fire is
>> to run around in circles waving his hands up and down over his head. :-)
>>
> No, that's called panicking :-D

I'm completely serious.  Just like the official sign for a scuba diver 
having trouble on the surface is to rip off your mask, wave your hands 
around, and splash a bunch, screaming.

Just because it's official doesn't mean it has to be illogical. :-)

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: Mysteries of the universe
Date: 4 Sep 2009 14:28:05
Message: <4aa15c35$1@news.povray.org>
On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 11:26:21 -0700, Darren New wrote:

> Warp wrote:
>> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>>> It did end poorly. Indeed, it probably would have been more satisfying
>>> to just end it with "My god, it's full of stars", and cut out the bits
>>> after the pyrotechnics reflected in the helmet entirely.
>> 
>>   That line was actually not in the first movie at all. It was in the
>>   book,
>> and it was put in the sequel movie.
> 
> I did not know that. :-)

My recollection had been different as well, but Wikipedia confirms this 
(useful list of differences between the film and the book).

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Mike Raiford
Subject: Re: Mysteries of the universe
Date: 4 Sep 2009 14:47:36
Message: <4aa160c8$1@news.povray.org>
Warp wrote:

>    Some people say that they find the intro incomprehensible, or at least
> very hard to understand. I don't know why. I find it quite easy to
> understand.
> 
>   Two tribes of some pre-human species are having a squirmish about a pond
> of water. Then the loser tribe is hanging around when the weird monolith
> appears, and after touching it they start realizing that they could use
> bones as weapons, and they take the pond back. Cue a transition from a
> bone thrown into the air to a spaceship. Both tools of some kind. The
> inference is rather clear.

Dunno, it seemed rather disconnected from the rest of the film, imo.

-- 
~Mike


Post a reply to this message

From: Mike Raiford
Subject: Re: Mysteries of the universe
Date: 4 Sep 2009 14:48:20
Message: <4aa160f4$1@news.povray.org>
Darren New wrote:
> Mike Raiford wrote:
>> What about the intro? That was, IIRC the only reference to the 
>> monolith in the entire movie ...
> 
> Huh? No. There's a monolith on the moon, and one on one of saturn's moons.
> 
> Maybe I'm just projecting the book into the movie, tho.
> 

I don't recall the monolith being on the moon... Then again, I have 
slept a few times since seeing the movie, so maybe I'm wrong.


-- 
~Mike


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Mysteries of the universe
Date: 4 Sep 2009 14:50:03
Message: <4aa1615b@news.povray.org>
Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> I'm completely serious.  Just like the official sign for a scuba diver 
> having trouble on the surface is to rip off your mask, wave your hands 
> around, and splash a bunch, screaming.

  The emergency gesture underwater must be one of the most confusing ever:
It's the "thumbs up" gesture.

  The gesture which indicates that everything is ok is, not surprisingly,
the "ok" gesture, but the "thumbs up" gesture is also so commonly used for
"everything's ok" in other settings that some people get confused about it.

  There was an incident related to this during the filming of one of the
Harry Potter movies. While filming an underwater scene, after the scene
was done, Daniel Radcliffe made the "thums up" gesture to indicate that
everything went perfect. Of course the safety divers around didn't take
any chances and rushed to help him and get him to safety.

-- 
                                                          - Warp


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.