 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Looks very cool. Certainly going to clobber Wii if it works as well as they
show it working in the demos. Definitely watch the video on your xbox if you
can.
I want to know if you can use it to export BHV files. :-)
http://www.xbox.com/
http://www.giantbomb.com/xbox-natal-demo/17-719/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/technology/e3-2009/5429947/Video-Microsoft-Natal-demo-for-Xbox-360.html
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
If they can get this to really work it'll be groundbreaking,
I bet the demo is faked though.
>The answer is Willard Fillmore!
*> Oh no! That's the wrong answer! The correct answer is Willard Fillmore.
>But I said Willard Fillmore!
*>Please wait until the question is read before ringing in.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tim Attwood wrote:
> If they can get this to really work it'll be groundbreaking,
> I bet the demo is faked though.
The xbox (as in, the actual game) will show you a version of the demo that
looks very convincing, even to the extent that the character lags a half
second behind the actor. It shows the break-out clone and the painting program.
I'll agree the voice recognition is likely faked.
The one where you hand the picture to the video character and it says "Nice!
Orange!" I'd bet won't work nearly as well as implied either. But if it
does, wow.
It's still gonna whup the Wii. :-)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> I'll agree the voice recognition is likely faked.
I actually doubt that; you're talking about the one with the painting,
right? Most likely, they only have to recognize a few dozen words
(certainly less than a hundred!), and you can improve accuracy
dramatically by reducing the dictionary size.
Dragon NaturallySpeaking has already demonstrated that a modern PC has
more than enough memory and processing power to reliably interpret
thousands of words. Even the recent game EndWar used voice recognition
to control your troops.
--
Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I actually doubt that; you're talking about the one with the painting,
> right? Most likely, they only have to recognize a few dozen words
> (certainly less than a hundred!), and you can improve accuracy
> dramatically by reducing the dictionary size.
>
> Dragon NaturallySpeaking has already demonstrated that a modern PC has
> more than enough memory and processing power to reliably interpret
> thousands of words. Even the recent game EndWar used voice recognition to
> control your troops.
Also things like voice recognition in cars work very well with a wide range
of voice types and no training (and they typically have some low power cheap
CPU). My understanding was that if you only need to recognise a limited set
of words then it's much easier.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
>> I'll agree the voice recognition is likely faked.
>
> I actually doubt that; you're talking about the one with the painting,
> right?
No, I was talking about the "William Filmore" comment.
Altho, to be fair there, if they're trying to recognise "William Filmore" vs
not "William Filmore", it's probably easier than recognising any word.
Yeah, OK, if you have a list of words you accept as commands, it's probably
a lot easier than recognising arbitrary words out of a dictionary.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
