 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3/31/2009 8:18 AM, Phil Cook v2 wrote:
> NOM NOM NOM I HAZ CAKE
Do Sandgorgons eat cake? :o
--
...Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Happy Birthday everyone!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 1-4-2009 4:03, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:39:00 +0200, andrel wrote:
>
>> Reason: it was the final day of my first 20 years of continuous
>> temporary enployment in my hospital.
>
> Congrats! That's a rare thing (at least here in the US anyways) any
> more. We just had a lady retire from our department, <joke>probably the
> first in the company's history </joke="but probably not far off from the
> truth"> in January after 22 years
D*mn, I have been beaten. Well, I am still here, so may be when I add
another couple of years, I can finally get in the Guinness book of records.
> in not only the same company, but essentially the same job, too.
Me too. About 10 years ago I switched departments. From the department
of Medical Physics collaborating with Experimental Cardiology to the
department of Experimental Cardiology collaborating with Medical
Physics. But what I did did not change then, indeed it was in the middle
of a project. I just changed my staffroom and the place where I had
predominantly our weekly discussions.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 1-4-2009 8:35, Chambers wrote:
> On 3/31/2009 2:39 PM, andrel wrote:
>> 20 years of continuous temporary enployment
>
> There's something _very_ wrong here!
>
Is there? I didn't notice ;)
I don't have a problem with it. As long as I get a new contract whenever
the other runs out, I don't see the difference with a fixed position.
Next month one ends and there is money for another 6 months and in that
time we should get another grant. If not, we all have a problem.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Everybody says happy birthday when they see the cake. ;-)
Thanks guys...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Everybody says happy birthday when they see the cake. ;-)
The cake is a lie.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> The cake is a lie.
Twelve points.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:32:45 +0200, andrel wrote:
> On 1-4-2009 4:03, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:39:00 +0200, andrel wrote:
>>
>>> Reason: it was the final day of my first 20 years of continuous
>>> temporary enployment in my hospital.
>>
>> Congrats! That's a rare thing (at least here in the US anyways) any
>> more. We just had a lady retire from our department, <joke>probably
>> the first in the company's history </joke="but probably not far off
>> from the truth"> in January after 22 years
>
> D*mn, I have been beaten. Well, I am still here, so may be when I add
> another couple of years, I can finally get in the Guinness book of
> records.
Heh. :) I won't tell you how long my dad worked for the same company,
then. ;-)
>> in not only the same company, but essentially the same job, too.
>
> Me too. About 10 years ago I switched departments. From the department
> of Medical Physics collaborating with Experimental Cardiology to the
> department of Experimental Cardiology collaborating with Medical
> Physics. But what I did did not change then, indeed it was in the middle
> of a project. I just changed my staffroom and the place where I had
> predominantly our weekly discussions.
Yeah, Jean had commented that she'd seen so many managers, department
name changes, and reorganizations that she couldn't keep them straight
any more. Add to that that she thought I'd been around for longer than I
really was (we worked together for only about 4 years) and it got really
confusing - she'd say "You remember Anne somebody?" - to which I'd have
to say "Who?" "You know, our old manager".....Well, not *mine*. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 1-4-2009 15:47, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:32:45 +0200, andrel wrote:
>
>> On 1-4-2009 4:03, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:39:00 +0200, andrel wrote:
>>>
>>>> Reason: it was the final day of my first 20 years of continuous
>>>> temporary enployment in my hospital.
>>> Congrats! That's a rare thing (at least here in the US anyways) any
>>> more. We just had a lady retire from our department, <joke>probably
>>> the first in the company's history </joke="but probably not far off
>>> from the truth"> in January after 22 years
>> D*mn, I have been beaten. Well, I am still here, so may be when I add
>> another couple of years, I can finally get in the Guinness book of
>> records.
>
> Heh. :) I won't tell you how long my dad worked for the same company,
> then. ;-)
But was he on a string of temporary positions, because that was what was
the reason for my celebration?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:18:25 +0200, andrel wrote:
>> Heh. I won't tell you how long my dad worked for the same company,
>> then. ;-)
>
> But was he on a string of temporary positions, because that was what was
> the reason for my celebration?
Ah, now no, that would be a difference. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
