|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 1-4-2009 8:35, Chambers wrote:
> On 3/31/2009 2:39 PM, andrel wrote:
>> 20 years of continuous temporary enployment
>
> There's something _very_ wrong here!
>
Is there? I didn't notice ;)
I don't have a problem with it. As long as I get a new contract whenever
the other runs out, I don't see the difference with a fixed position.
Next month one ends and there is money for another 6 months and in that
time we should get another grant. If not, we all have a problem.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |