 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>
>> Why...why...WHY...why would they do this? o_O
>
> I wonder if anybody will figure out where this is quoted from...
It rings a bell from a Friends episode.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
> A quickie C# example ...
Maybe the problem is not so much the PostScript language he tries to
*interpret*, but that Halks... Haks... that hassle of a language he tries to
*implement* it in ;)
BTW - I found PostScript to be one of the most-fun languages to program in...
the whole stack-based approach with reversed notation, the string-handling that
lets you get a substring and then manipulate the *original* string via it, and
so on...
Best thing about it: It usually comes with easy-to-use graphics output :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka wrote:
> BTW - I found PostScript to be one of the most-fun languages to program in...
You should look into FORTH. PostScript is based on it.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
The NFL should go international. I'd pay to
see the Detroit Lions vs the Roman Catholics.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> Why...why...WHY...why would they do this? o_O
>>
>> I wonder if anybody will figure out where this is quoted from...
>
> It rings a bell from a Friends episode.
LOL! We have a winner...
I used to have quite a lot of empathy with Chandler. You know - before
he became all *successful* and stuff... :-/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka wrote:
> Maybe the problem is not so much the PostScript language he tries to
> *interpret*, but that Halks... Haks... that hassle of a language he tries to
> *implement* it in ;)
Yes. Of course. The fact that the grammer is ambiguous is only a problem
in Haskell. All other programming languages are easily able to cope with
this. :-P
Actually, the problem seems to be the way I've chosen to design my
parser. (I.e., as a one-pass parser.) Now that I'm redesigning it to a
two-pass parser, things seem to be going much more smoothly.
(You can design things wrong in *any* language.)
> BTW - I found PostScript to be one of the most-fun languages to program in...
...and you think I'm writing a PostScript interpretter because...? ;-)
> Best thing about it: It usually comes with easy-to-use graphics output :)
Depends on what you think of as "easy".
It makes it very easy to do vector graphics. It makes it rather harder
to do anything bitmapped.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Invisible [mailto:voi### [at] dev null]
> >>> Why...why...WHY...why would they do this? o_O
> >>
> >> I wonder if anybody will figure out where this is quoted from...
> >
> > It rings a bell from a Friends episode.
>
> LOL! We have a winner...
Is that the one where they talk about women sharing?
"I said share, not scare!"
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>>>> Why...why...WHY...why would they do this? o_O
> Is that the one where they talk about women sharing?
>
> "I said share, not scare!"
Women. They tell each other *everything*.
Yeah, I know.
No, dude, *everything*! I mean like, their most intimate moments.
Technique. Stimina, Girth.
Why...why...WHY...why would they do this?!
Well, *apparently* it's really great, and we should be doing it too...
Do you wanna do it?
We're not gonna talk about girth are-
-NO!
Yeah, OK.
...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
>>>> Why...why...WHY...why would they do this? o_O
>>>
>>> I wonder if anybody will figure out where this is quoted from...
>>
>> It rings a bell from a Friends episode.
>
> LOL! We have a winner...
Good lord, I'm on some sort of quote roll here... :)
> I used to have quite a lot of empathy with Chandler. You know - before
> he became all *successful* and stuff... :-/
"Oh no, two women love me. They're both gorgeous and sexy, my wallet's
too small for my fifties and my diamond shoes are too tight!"
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Invisible [mailto:voi### [at] devnull]
> We're not gonna talk about girth are-
>
> -NO!
>
> Yeah, OK.
>
> ...
OK, well you know when you're in bed, with a woman, and you start to get
all these mental images in your head, like, you know, Elle McPherson, or
that girl from the copy place -
- the one with the belly button ring? -
- and then all of a sudden, your Mom pops in your head! And you're like,
you know, Mom, get out of here! And then of course, after that, you can't
possibly think of anything else, and you can't, you know, stop what you're
doing, so it's kind of like you're... you know.. you know... You don't
know!
- You're telling me, you're telling me about your Mom? What is the matter
with you?
- You said -
- I said "share," not "scare!"
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Chambers" <ben### [at] pacificwebguycom> wrote:
> OK, well you know when you're in bed, with a woman, and you start to get
> all these mental images in your head, like, you know, Elle McPherson, or
> that girl from the copy place -
>
> - the one with the belly button ring? -
>
> - and then all of a sudden, your Mom pops in your head!
FAIL
yes, it can happen to anyone. ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
