Warp escreveu:
> Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> AFAIK, when you install a C compiler, you don't get OpenGL bindings,
> 
>   It depends on the C compiler. Some come bundled with OpenGL libraries.
> 
>> a parser library, 4 seperate multithreading tools, a set of container
>> libraries, graph theory libraries...
> 
>   C++ is a bit better in this regard. Just because of the C++ standard,
> compilers have to come with tons of libraries.

Why should a compiler project package together other project's 
libraries, specially ones that are likely to be found on the host system?

The situation with Haskell is different:  it doesn't come with "opengl 
lib", it comes with a Haskell binding to opengl. C/C++ doesn't need 
this, as it's perfectly fine calling the lib functions in the very same 
syntax and calling conventions they were written in.

Post a reply to this message

Thx for the advise, I see I'm not alone in my POV (Point of View) and I 
also see my common sesnse isn't far from the truth as I thought.

I thank everyone who cared on guiding me in this long Haskell road I 
just started to crawl.

I have read in the Haskell site that the best way to learn Haskell is 
from a book, so I've downloaded a couple (don't ask from where since 
those are illegal ways, I have to, my salary is 180$us a month, I hope u 
can understand if not well, I have no other choice) also Haskell98, the 
most recent manual and other .pdf files and in other formats.

Also I've come aware of Leksah and how to COMPILE(darn) it. The screen 
shots were from a Linux version (how convenient... for them! :D ).

I hope Haskell gets better soon, it has a SPECTACULAR FUTURE.

Well, I think I can raw my boat alone from here, again I thank you for 
ur help. God bless you all.

Post a reply to this message

"Saul Luizaga" <sau### [at] netscapenet> wrote

> I have read in the Haskell site that the best way to learn Haskell is
> from a book, so I've downloaded a couple (don't ask from where since
> those are illegal ways,

[...]

>God bless you all.

To each his own, but no matter how many times I see or hear about the
apparently happy coexistence of blatantly conflicting ideologies within
people's minds, I cannot but grin.

Post a reply to this message

somebody wrote:
> To each his own, but no matter how many times I see or hear about the
> apparently happy coexistence of blatantly conflicting ideologies within
> people's minds, I cannot but grin.

To each his own, but no matter how many times I hear monotheists assume that 
everyone referring to god must intend that monotheist's interpretation of 
their own god's holy scriptures, I have to grimace.

Me, I think Pan and Loki would both be proud.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   The NFL should go international. I'd pay to
   see the Detroit Lions vs the Roman Catholics.

Post a reply to this message

"Darren New" <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote in message
news:493343b7@news.povray.org...
> somebody wrote:

> > To each his own, but no matter how many times I see or hear about the
> > apparently happy coexistence of blatantly conflicting ideologies within
> > people's minds, I cannot but grin.

> To each his own, but no matter how many times I hear monotheists assume
that
> everyone referring to god must intend that monotheist's interpretation of
> their own god's holy scriptures, I have to grimace.

I've yet to see a polytheist (let's not split hairs with trinity, remnants
or elements of polytheism), and hardly a non-Christian for that matter,
utter the words "God bless you", so I tend to believe it's a comparatively
safe assumption. What is much less safe is to assume it's a monotheist doing
the aforementioned assuming.

Post a reply to this message

somebody wrote:
> "Saul Luizaga" <sau### [at] netscapenet> wrote
> 
>> I have read in the Haskell site that the best way to learn Haskell is
>> from a book, so I've downloaded a couple (don't ask from where since
>> those are illegal ways,
> 
> [...]
> 
>> God bless you all.
> 
> To each his own, but no matter how many times I see or hear about the
> apparently happy coexistence of blatantly conflicting ideologies within
> people's minds, I cannot but grin.
> 
> 
So u assume that If I belive in God (my conception is the maker of ALL 
even your soul, I believe that He came to be with us a Jesus Christ) I'm 
not Catholic anymore or any CHristian religion, I'm a spiritual 
Christian) I'll not do wrong things? Well I have seen religious and 
"better" Christian than me, act in the most hypocrite way possible to 
their proxy, my fault is from need, this book wont be probably read by 
anybody else in my whole Country and the BSA only make pay for software 
licenses to institutions, Universities, companies and other entities 
that can actually pay for it since they are making money our of it and 
have enough, the BSA understands that a third world Country can't be 
left out of modern technology coz would be even poorer and in a way of 
helping ppl here they don't go house by house making an auditory of 
software. I hope u understand why ppl in poor Countries need to pirate 
software, and also against all odds ppl here also buy (legally) software 
when is rare and they "don't have to".

  Hence some software companies like Avast! and other give their 
software free for home office. believe me I'd pay for software if I 
could earn enough as some people actually do in my country although is 
still rare.

I'm using utilities and other software to give support to PCs/Notebooks 
as freeware as I can since they're are not only in many cases easy to 
use and effective u don't need to download a crack/keygen that can 
infect ur PC/Notebook with a lethal virus, or other inconvinients.

I'm not legal for these reasons but I feel no shame either, I hate MS 
and I need the rest of the software.

I actually don't need/have to explain this to you but I do coz some ppl 
here can't simply understand why oh why ppl pirate software since the 
pirates actually bite the hand than gives them the bread.

Believe me, I have no conflict about it, but I know that I could do 
better if I had more money. I'm working on getting my Eng. degree to 
have more. Yeah I'M A PIRATE, u don't need to write to me at all.

Cheers.

Post a reply to this message

Saul Luizaga wrote:
  >  Hence some software companies like Avast! and other give their 
software
> free for home *use*.

I correct myself.

Post a reply to this message

> better if I had more money. I'm working on getting my Eng. degree to have 
> more.

Nah, just carry on stealing software, it's way easier than an Engineering 
degree :-)

Post a reply to this message

"Saul Luizaga" <sau### [at] netscapenet> wrote in message
news:4934e252@news.povray.org...
> somebody wrote:
> > "Saul Luizaga" <sau### [at] netscapenet> wrote

> >> I have read in the Haskell site that the best way to learn Haskell is
> >> from a book, so I've downloaded a couple (don't ask from where since
> >> those are illegal ways,
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> God bless you all.

> > To each his own, but no matter how many times I see or hear about the
> > apparently happy coexistence of blatantly conflicting ideologies within
> > people's minds, I cannot but grin.

[...]
> Believe me, I have no conflict about it,
[...]

Yes, that's the part I said I found funny. And really, it's both unnecessary
and futile for you to try justify it.

Post a reply to this message

I know is unnecessary, I already wrote it, and I'm not just justifying 
it but explaining it. I don't care it get justified I thought was 
something I needed to write. I hope u never get to live in a 3rd world 
country and live on a local salary to actually understand the why, u 
don't care enough to imagine it and suffering it would be too much for u.

Post a reply to this message