|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> What *actually* happened was completely different. :-/
Hey, I followed instructions to make a Xenon flash strobe light back in
high school. I was picking glass out of the carpet for weeks.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> ...are either of those companies still going? I thought Novell went
> under years ago, and RedHat vanished off the face of the earth once they
> realised that trying to sell Linux services isn't profitable.
...
I don't even know how to reply to that.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:37:03 +0000, Invisible wrote:
>> It only exists within firms providing the infrastructure and research
>> everybody else employs to do their things. I'm talking about
>> Microsoft, Adobe, Sun, Autodesk, open source projects etc...
>
> Yeah - maybe I should get said to write open source software?
>
> Oh, wait...
http://www.novell.com/careers
Getting paid for developing open source does happen. Novell, RedHat,
Canonical - even Microsoft - all pay pretty well for open source
development.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:39:06 +0000, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>> You could try submitting your resumé to Novell, RedHat and the likes.
>
> ...are either of those companies still going? I thought Novell went
> under years ago, and RedHat vanished off the face of the earth once they
> realised that trying to sell Linux services isn't profitable.
Who do I work for again? ;-)
And RedHat is currently selling more Linux than Novell. Turns out
customers *want* service contracts for things their business depends on.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> But this has basically been my experience in every group project I've ever
> worked on. I've never met any other students who can actually program / do
> advanced math / comprehend complicated logic / etc. Basically I'm always
> the only guy in the group with any kind of technical skill.
Maybe you should have gone to a better University with more people at your
level? I can't remember exactly how old you are, did you have to go through
the whole University application thingy where you supply your predicted
A-level grades and get made offers from different places? DId you choose
somewhere that offered you really low grades or what? You seem to have been
quite mismatched with the course.
> (Although saying that... I *did* give some guy on my college course the
> code to my Mandelbrot generator. Actually I didn't *give* him the code, I
> just sat next to him and told him what to write. He seemed to be a
> half-competent programmer. That is, I didn't have to tell him character by
> character what to type, and he made lots of alterations after I went away
> which didn't break the code...)
I think some people are just destined not to program, we had a 4x2 hour time
slot to do some C++ practical, which anyone who had ever made a simple
program with a few functions could have done easily in the first 2 hours.
Yet there were 1 or 2 people who were still there right at the end
struggling with the whole concept.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Well, as I say, I started by wiring up one NAND gate, a pair of switches
> and an LED. What *should* have happened is that the LED lights up unless
> you simultaneously press both switches. What *actually* happened was
> completely different. :-/
How did you wire up the switches to the inputs? You can't just use a
connect/disconnect switch to the V+ line, because when it is disconnected
the input will be "floating" and probably float high. You need to either
add a pull-down resistor or wire up a switch to connect between 0V and V+
alternately.
How did you wire up the LED? LEDs operate depending on current, not voltage,
so you usually need a resistor in series to fix the current. Did you also
check that the IC could source/sink enough current to drive the LED?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:39:06 +0000, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>
>>> You could try submitting your resumé to Novell, RedHat and the likes.
>> ...are either of those companies still going? I thought Novell went
>> under years ago, and RedHat vanished off the face of the earth once they
>> realised that trying to sell Linux services isn't profitable.
>
> Who do I work for again? ;-)
Uh... you tell me?
> And RedHat is currently selling more Linux than Novell. Turns out
> customers *want* service contracts for things their business depends on.
OK. So why have I not heard anything about RedHat for several years?
Have they gone into some kind of specialised market or something? Once
upon a time you used to hear of them quite a bit, and now they seem
awful quiet...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Yeah - maybe I should get said to write open source software?
>>
>> Oh, wait...
>
> http://www.novell.com/careers
>
> Getting paid for developing open source does happen.
Yeah, it does - just not particularly often. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Videogames sell a lot, but don't employ nearly as much as such huge an
>> industry should.
>
> It's really not that huge an industry. Even software in general is
> "niche" compared to, for example, construction or banking.
My sister is an accountant. (Not even a fully-qualified accountant yet.)
One week, they tell her on Monday "oh, by the way, we don't need you any
more. Goodbye."
That Friday, she's all moaning because she has FIVE FIRM JOB OFFERS and
SHE CAN'T DECIDE which one to pick! o_O
As in, it took her less than 3 business days to find (presumably more
than) 5 jobs, apply to them, go to (at least) 5 interviews, actually get
accepted and get 5 firm job offers.
WTF? I've been trying to get a new job for, like, 2 years, and so far
I've been to *one* job interview.
On the other hand... every company on Earth needs at least one
accountant. (This is a legal requirement. IIRC, it's something like if
you employ more than 6 people, one of them must be an accountant.) Big
companies need them. Small companies need them. Companies in every
sector of commerce need them. EVERYBODY needs accountants. If you're an
accountant, you can work for anybody, in principle.
MOST companies need salesmen. Not all of them, but most of them.
Almost no companies need programmers. MOST companies need computers and
need software, but MOST companies buy software rather than making it. If
you're a programmer, you can ONLY work for companies that write
software, or companies that are large enough to have an internal
department that writes software.
That's a pretty small market. And obviously, I'm just some random
computer nerd. There are people out there with actual *talent*. Why is
some company gonna hire me when they could hire one of the talented guys?
Also, apparently there's some kind of global recession thing happening
at the moment, so people are currently firing rather than hiring...
>> I don't know, I have a feeling such huge niches do not employ people
>> by advertising jobs through conventional channels.
>
> Most jobs requiring competence don't advertise. It's mostly
> word-of-mouth.
...and since I don't know anybody, it's not going to be me.
> Plus, it seems most software places are utterly uninterested in someone
> who could learn to do the job quickly but who don't already know all the
> skills required. I haven't quite figured that out. "We need someone who
> knows Java 1.5.7. You only list Java 1.5.4 on your resume."
Depends.
SOME people want somebody who can definitely do the job RIGHT NOW. They
are only interested in what technologies you know (or claim to know)
right now, and won't look at anything beyond that.
SOME people want somebody who can learn stuff. Some of them are
explicitly not interested in what you know now, they just want somebody
who can learn. (E.g., I suspect if you applied to work for Google, what
they'd be most interested in is that you can learn Crazy New Gizmo X
really quickly next time they roll out something new.)
Unfortunately, at the moment I'm having trouble finding either kind of
employer... :-(
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scott wrote:
>> Well, as I say, I started by wiring up one NAND gate, a pair of
>> switches and an LED. What *should* have happened is that the LED
>> lights up unless you simultaneously press both switches. What
>> *actually* happened was completely different. :-/
>
> How did you wire up the switches to the inputs? You can't just use a
> connect/disconnect switch to the V+ line, because when it is
> disconnected the input will be "floating" and probably float high. You
> need to either add a pull-down resistor or wire up a switch to connect
> between 0V and V+ alternately.
>
> How did you wire up the LED? LEDs operate depending on current, not
> voltage, so you usually need a resistor in series to fix the current.
> Did you also check that the IC could source/sink enough current to drive
> the LED?
.......see, now, I went into digital electronics to precisely to *avoid*
this kind of craziness! >_<
Take a look at a diagram such as this:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a9/Full-adder.svg
How many resistors can you see? Because I count NONE!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|