POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Idle curiosity Server Time
7 Sep 2024 09:25:18 EDT (-0400)
  Idle curiosity (Message 12 to 21 of 31)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Idle curiosity
Date: 18 Aug 2008 07:44:06
Message: <48a96086$1@news.povray.org>
Stephen wrote:

> I think that you've forgotten that electromechanical relays themselves contain
> several components. The coil, the former, the armature, the contacts and don't
> forget the back EMF diode.

True. But you purchase "a relay" and it already has all these parts 
assembled. If you purchase "a transistor" you still apparently have to 
connect half a dozen other components to it before it will do anything 
interesting. ;-)

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Idle curiosity
Date: 18 Aug 2008 07:45:14
Message: <48a960ca@news.povray.org>
OK, so does anybody know the difference between a TTL logic gate and a 
CMOS logic gate?

I mean, *obviously* they make 'em a different way. But I don't make 
logic gates - I use them. Is there any difference visible to the end-user?

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Idle curiosity
Date: 18 Aug 2008 08:14:39
Message: <ulpia4pai74ob441t44osoa9kb843282c3@4ax.com>
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:45:13 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:

>OK, so does anybody know the difference between a TTL logic gate and a 
>CMOS logic gate?
>
>I mean, *obviously* they make 'em a different way. But I don't make 
>logic gates - I use them. Is there any difference visible to the end-user?

TTL is slower and uses more power.
I once built a clock out of TTL, in the mid 70's it used IIRC 50 amps at 5 Volts
Vcc. A couple of years later a CMOS clock ran from a PP3 battery
-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: scott
Subject: Re: Idle curiosity
Date: 18 Aug 2008 08:16:44
Message: <48a9682c$1@news.povray.org>
> Ah, OK. If you want bipolar then yes, you'll need more relays. I'm used to 
> playing with TTL circuits where if you connect it to V+, that's 1, and if 
> you connect it to thin air, that's 0.

Err no, in TTL with BJTs, a floating input is usually pulled up to V+ inside 
the chip, but this is not guaranteed so your inputs should never be floating 
(always tie unused inputs to either V- or V+).  *Outputting* a floating 
signal is just a disaster is normal logic (there is nothing to stop some 
very small amount of interference driving it high), and usually only used 
where you need to have more than one output connected to the same line (eg 
the data bus inside your PC - each connection to it should be able to output 
low, high, or not-connected).


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Idle curiosity
Date: 18 Aug 2008 08:18:36
Message: <48a9689c$1@news.povray.org>
Stephen wrote:

> TTL is slower and uses more power.
> I once built a clock out of TTL, in the mid 70's it used IIRC 50 amps at 5 Volts
> Vcc. A couple of years later a CMOS clock ran from a PP3 battery

50 amps? Shouldn't that tend to cause wires to melt and so forth?

Hey, isn't CMOS that stuff that breaks if you get static on it?

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Idle curiosity
Date: 18 Aug 2008 08:22:53
Message: <48a9699d$1@news.povray.org>
>> I'm 
>> used to playing with TTL circuits where if you connect it to V+, 
>> that's 1, and if you connect it to thin air, that's 0.
> 
> Err no, in TTL with BJTs, a floating input is usually pulled up to V+ 
> inside the chip, but this is not guaranteed so your inputs should never 
> be floating (always tie unused inputs to either V- or V+).

Uh... OK. I never did that before - but hey, maybe that's why half my 
circuits didn't work?

Damnit, I thought digital electronics was just about on or off. :-/

> *Outputting* 
> a floating signal is just a disaster is normal logic (there is nothing 
> to stop some very small amount of interference driving it high), and 
> usually only used where you need to have more than one output connected 
> to the same line (eg the data bus inside your PC - each connection to it 
> should be able to output low, high, or not-connected).

You speak of "3-valued logic" with it's "Hi-Z" mode?

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Idle curiosity
Date: 18 Aug 2008 10:50:55
Message: <h03ja498fk2vk94bni2p06c98hd1hv3lnv@4ax.com>
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:18:36 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:

>Stephen wrote:
>
>> TTL is slower and uses more power.
>> I once built a clock out of TTL, in the mid 70's it used IIRC 50 amps at 5 Volts
>> Vcc. A couple of years later a CMOS clock ran from a PP3 battery
>
>50 amps? Shouldn't that tend to cause wires to melt and so forth?

That was the total current supplied from the PS but there were lots of cards
taking significantly less current. IIRC TTL uses about 50 m.a. per chip. And the
wires won't melt if they are rated for it.

>Hey, isn't CMOS that stuff that breaks if you get static on it?

Yes, at one time I worked for Motorola and had unlimited supply of the stuff :)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Idle curiosity
Date: 18 Aug 2008 10:56:49
Message: <48a98db1@news.povray.org>
>> 50 amps? Shouldn't that tend to cause wires to melt and so forth?
> 
> That was the total current supplied from the PS but there were lots of cards
> taking significantly less current. IIRC TTL uses about 50 m.a. per chip. And the
> wires won't melt if they are rated for it.

Well, 30A wire is so thick that you have to bend it with pliars and a 
hammer. I'd hate to think what 50A wire is like! o_O

>> Hey, isn't CMOS that stuff that breaks if you get static on it?
> 
> Yes, at one time I worked for Motorola and had unlimited supply of the stuff :)

OK. So I think I'm building my device using TTL, just so I don't *break* 
the thing before it's finished. :-S

(You know, Maplin used to sell practically the entire 7400 range. Now it 
seems they only sell 6 models. Also, the 7400 used to be 21.62p. It's 


-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: scott
Subject: Re: Idle curiosity
Date: 19 Aug 2008 02:17:40
Message: <48aa6584@news.povray.org>
> Uh... OK. I never did that before - but hey, maybe that's why half my 
> circuits didn't work?

Hehe maybe, you certainly shouldn't assume that a not-connected or floating 
input will be treated as logic 0.

> Damnit, I thought digital electronics was just about on or off. :-/

It is if you follow the specifications of the particular logic family you 
are using, IIRC TTL is something like 0-0.8V for logic 0, and 2.5V and above 
for logic 1.

> You speak of "3-valued logic" with it's "Hi-Z" mode?

I don't know what it's called, but I remember it when we were doing simple 
memory circuits at university, you need to be able to output either 0,1 or 
floating to the data bus.


Post a reply to this message

From: scott
Subject: Re: Idle curiosity
Date: 19 Aug 2008 02:19:26
Message: <48aa65ee$1@news.povray.org>
> OK. So I think I'm building my device using TTL, just so I don't *break* 
> the thing before it's finished. :-S

What are you making BTW?  Could you use one of those cheap micro controllers 
instead?


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.