POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Need for speed Server Time
7 Sep 2024 15:27:26 EDT (-0400)
  Need for speed (Message 139 to 148 of 168)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: Phil Cook
Subject: Re: Ah, history
Date: 18 Jul 2008 05:35:50
Message: <op.uehd9gygc3xi7v@news.povray.org>
And lo on Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:24:30 +0100, scott <sco### [at] scottcom> did  
spake, saying:

>> Yeah all you've got is an OS that can have multiple users; reads/writes  
>> to a hard drive; works with multiple USB devices; shows pictures, plays  
>> music, videos, and games; communicates via Bluetooth and a  
>> wired/wireless TCP/IP connection; and comes with an internet browser.
>>
>> Completely different to what Windows does :-P
>
> Actually that sounds like my phone, and that has something like 35MB RAM  
> ;-)

Heh and the ones running Windows Mobile will even run cut down versions of  
Word and Excel while allowing you to make phone calls, check your diary,  
browse the 'net and pick up your email... Perhaps we should all be running  
that version on our desktops instead ;-)

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com


Post a reply to this message

From: Orchid XP v8
Subject: Re: Ah, history
Date: 18 Jul 2008 05:47:08
Message: <4880669c$1@news.povray.org>
>> Actually that sounds like my phone, and that has something like 35MB 
>> RAM ;-)
> 
> Heh and the ones running Windows Mobile will even run cut down versions 
> of Word and Excel while allowing you to make phone calls, check your 
> diary, browse the 'net and pick up your email... Perhaps we should all 
> be running that version on our desktops instead ;-)

...and THIS is why I'm reluctant to buy a new phone. Who would want to 
pay money for something that runs an M$ OS? :-S

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: Phil Cook
Subject: Re: Ah, history
Date: 18 Jul 2008 06:07:58
Message: <op.uehfq0hcc3xi7v@news.povray.org>
And lo on Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:47:10 +0100, Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull>  
did spake, saying:

>>> Actually that sounds like my phone, and that has something like 35MB  
>>> RAM ;-)
>>  Heh and the ones running Windows Mobile will even run cut down  
>> versions of Word and Excel while allowing you to make phone calls,  
>> check your diary, browse the 'net and pick up your email... Perhaps we  
>> should all be running that version on our desktops instead ;-)
>
> ...and THIS is why I'm reluctant to buy a new phone. Who would want to  
> pay money for something that runs an M$ OS? :-S

A lot of the problems we had stemmed from the third-party interface  
plonked on the top, once I removed that it was quite stable. They would  
occasionally refuse to link to the computer unless you restarted the  
phone, but I've had the same problem with the NokiaOS.

I'm still impressed that if you made a change in Outlook while the phone  
was connected it would automatically sync that item and was quite happy  
syncing between multiple unconnected computers; something that both the  
Nokia and Sony Ericsson phones still don't do or have problems with.

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com


Post a reply to this message

From: Orchid XP v8
Subject: Re: Ah, history
Date: 18 Jul 2008 06:44:14
Message: <488073fe@news.povray.org>
>> ...and THIS is why I'm reluctant to buy a new phone. Who would want to 
>> pay money for something that runs an M$ OS? :-S
> 
> A lot of the problems we had stemmed from the third-party interface 
> plonked on the top, once I removed that it was quite stable. They would 
> occasionally refuse to link to the computer unless you restarted the 
> phone, but I've had the same problem with the NokiaOS.
> 
> I'm still impressed that if you made a change in Outlook while the phone 
> was connected it would automatically sync that item and was quite happy 
> syncing between multiple unconnected computers; something that both the 
> Nokia and Sony Ericsson phones still don't do or have problems with.

Well let me put it this way. My current mobile phone is a little bit 
worn out now. And it wasn't a very good phone to start with. But on the 
other hand, it doesn't seem to be *possible* to buy a mobile phone 
that's just a phone any more. It has to also try to be a camera and a 
music system and a database and... I just want a phone?

Also, for some reason flip phones seem to be extremely rare right now. 
Personally I dislike being charged money because my phone has 
accidentally called somebody while it's in my pocket. Some phones allow 
you to "lock" the keypad, but it can still call 999, causing a pretty 
serious hazard as it might block out a *real* emergency call.

(My current phone was clearly designed by idiots. Or at least, by people 
who have never attempted to *use* their product! For example, if you 
write an SMS and select "Options", option #1 is... adjust the screen 
setting? WTF? Surely you're going to do this, like, ONCE, when you first 
get the phone, and never change it again. By contrast, the option you'll 
want 99% of the time is "send" - which is option #4. If you *receive* an 
SMS, "reply" is option #8 - which doesn't even fit onto the screen 
without scrolling. At least my old Nokia had a sane menu system...)

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: scott
Subject: Re: Ah, history
Date: 18 Jul 2008 06:59:54
Message: <488077aa$1@news.povray.org>
> Well let me put it this way. My current mobile phone is a little bit worn 
> out now. And it wasn't a very good phone to start with. But on the other 
> hand, it doesn't seem to be *possible* to buy a mobile phone that's just a 
> phone any more. It has to also try to be a camera and a music system and a 
> database and... I just want a phone?

Try the Nokia 1208, it's really cheap (like 20 quid cheap) and doesn't have 
hardly any features so should be just what you're looking for.


Post a reply to this message

From: Phil Cook
Subject: Re: Ah, history
Date: 18 Jul 2008 07:19:19
Message: <op.uehi1xgic3xi7v@news.povray.org>
And lo on Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:44:15 +0100, Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull>  
did spake, saying:

>>> ...and THIS is why I'm reluctant to buy a new phone. Who would want to  
>>> pay money for something that runs an M$ OS? :-S
>>  A lot of the problems we had stemmed from the third-party interface  
>> plonked on the top, once I removed that it was quite stable. They would  
>> occasionally refuse to link to the computer unless you restarted the  
>> phone, but I've had the same problem with the NokiaOS.
>>  I'm still impressed that if you made a change in Outlook while the  
>> phone was connected it would automatically sync that item and was quite  
>> happy syncing between multiple unconnected computers; something that  
>> both the Nokia and Sony Ericsson phones still don't do or have problems  
>> with.
>
> Well let me put it this way. My current mobile phone is a little bit  
> worn out now. And it wasn't a very good phone to start with. But on the  
> other hand, it doesn't seem to be *possible* to buy a mobile phone  
> that's just a phone any more. It has to also try to be a camera and a  
> music system and a database and... I just want a phone?

They're out there just not displayed as prominently because they're cheap.

> Also, for some reason flip phones seem to be extremely rare right now.

They were in vogue for a while along with sliding ones, perhaps people got  
fed-up with the flip/slide breaking? Or it was just cheaper not to build  
them that way?

> Personally I dislike being charged money because my phone has  
> accidentally called somebody while it's in my pocket. Some phones allow  
> you to "lock" the keypad,

I've not seen a phone that doesn't allow this.

> but it can still call 999, causing a pretty serious hazard as it might  
> block out a *real* emergency call.

It can still call any emergency number, but the I bet the likelyhood of  
hitting the three correct digits and dial remains small.

> (My current phone was clearly designed by idiots. Or at least, by people  
> who have never attempted to *use* their product! For example, if you  
> write an SMS and select "Options", option #1 is... adjust the screen  
> setting? WTF? Surely you're going to do this, like, ONCE, when you first  
> get the phone, and never change it again. By contrast, the option you'll  
> want 99% of the time is "send" - which is option #4. If you *receive* an  
> SMS, "reply" is option #8 - which doesn't even fit onto the screen  
> without scrolling. At least my old Nokia had a sane menu system...)

Again I like my SE phone menu system. You can navigate through using the  
numbers next to the choices, I can lock it and switch it to silent with  
two key presses likewise get the date, model and my telephone number from  
the Phone Status two clicks away (the number of times I've seen people  
being asked exactly which model of phone they have and being stumped  
because it's not shown anywhere amazes me).

It has its problems - there are two ways of locking and silent and they  
appear in each menu in a different order; the call log is unintuitive if  
you want to know the time someone tried to call you yesterday, and has a  
nasty habit of compressing multiple calls into one entry so it appears  
they've only tried once. Other then those it's fine.

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com


Post a reply to this message

From: Michael Zier
Subject: Re: Ah, history
Date: 18 Jul 2008 07:34:25
Message: <48807fc1$1@news.povray.org>
> music system and a database and... I just want a phone?
> 
Motorola F3 (GIYF)


Post a reply to this message

From: Orchid XP v8
Subject: Re: Ah, history
Date: 18 Jul 2008 07:36:07
Message: <48808027$1@news.povray.org>
>> Well let me put it this way. My current mobile phone is a little bit 
>> worn out now. And it wasn't a very good phone to start with. But on 
>> the other hand, it doesn't seem to be *possible* to buy a mobile phone 
>> that's just a phone any more. It has to also try to be a camera and a 
>> music system and a database and... I just want a phone?
> 
> They're out there just not displayed as prominently because they're cheap.

Heh, I'll bet. ;-)

>> Also, for some reason flip phones seem to be extremely rare right now.
> 
> They were in vogue for a while along with sliding ones, perhaps people 
> got fed-up with the flip/slide breaking? Or it was just cheaper not to 
> build them that way?

Lots of slide phones around, not seeing many flip phones...

>> but it can still call 999, causing a pretty serious hazard as it might 
>> block out a *real* emergency call.
> 
> It can still call any emergency number, but the I bet the likelyhood of 
> hitting the three correct digits and dial remains small.

Um... hit 9 three times? (Or alternatively, just hold down the 9 key for 
a second or so.) It's really very easy. I made many, many calls this way 
with my old Nokia 3210.

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: Michael Zier
Subject: Re: Ah, history
Date: 18 Jul 2008 07:36:27
Message: <4880803b@news.povray.org>
Am Fri, 18 Jul 2008 07:34:25 -0400 schrieb Michael Zier:

>> music system and a database and... I just want a phone?
>> 
> Motorola F3 (GIYF)

I forgot: geek bonus points for using e-paper!


Post a reply to this message

From: Phil Cook
Subject: Re: Ah, history
Date: 18 Jul 2008 07:55:18
Message: <op.uehkpsrwc3xi7v@news.povray.org>
And lo on Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:36:09 +0100, Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull>  
did spake, saying:

>>> Well let me put it this way. My current mobile phone is a little bit  
>>> worn out now. And it wasn't a very good phone to start with. But on  
>>> the other hand, it doesn't seem to be *possible* to buy a mobile phone  
>>> that's just a phone any more. It has to also try to be a camera and a  
>>> music system and a database and... I just want a phone?
>>  They're out there just not displayed as prominently because they're  
>> cheap.
>
> Heh, I'll bet. ;-)

Same deal with contracts.

>>> Also, for some reason flip phones seem to be extremely rare right now.
>>  They were in vogue for a while along with sliding ones, perhaps people  
>> got fed-up with the flip/slide breaking? Or it was just cheaper not to  
>> build them that way?
>
> Lots of slide phones around, not seeing many flip phones...

I suppose the slide is more durable then a flip?

>>> but it can still call 999, causing a pretty serious hazard as it might  
>>> block out a *real* emergency call.
>>  It can still call any emergency number, but the I bet the likelyhood  
>> of hitting the three correct digits and dial remains small.
>
> Um... hit 9 three times? (Or alternatively, just hold down the 9 key for  
> a second or so.) It's really very easy. I made many, many calls this way  
> with my old Nokia 3210.

Hmm all the phones I've had you've had to hit dial before or after the  
number.

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.