|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 27 May 2008 10:45:06 +0100, Phil Cook wrote:
> And lo on Sun, 25 May 2008 01:40:10 +0100, Jim Henderson
> <nos### [at] nospamcom> did spake, saying:
>
>> I often have to read it a second time to 'Americanise' the spellings
>> just to avoid having half my audience tell me I can't spell. ;-)
>
> Shouldn't that be Americanize :-P
I wondered if someone would pick up on that - thing is, it was
automatic. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 27 May 2008 11:33:54 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
wrote:
>Well, I know the recent changes in UK immigration state three criteria -
>money (to invest), age (lower is better - and I'm over the rather
>arbitrary age threshold), and a college degree. In the old points
>system, I was good to go, but they changed all that within the last
>year. (My wife follows it fairly closely.)
There is a lot of pressure on the politicians to be seen to be doing
something. Halfwits!
>Possibly coming over while employed by a US company would work (it does
>here in the US - my last boss was a Canadian immigrant, and my current
>boss lives in Canada).
That's what gave me the thought.
>Wow, small world, isn't it? Almost makes me wonder if you know the guy I
>know there. That'd be weird. IIRC, he said the population was fairly
>low there...
Well I left the area nearly thirty years ago. If he worked at
Burroughs there is a chance.
I was the long haired girlie looking one :)
>>>> Funny enough I am thinking about leaving the country as it is going to
>>>> the dogs in a handcart, if you will pardon the mixed metaphor :)
>>>
>>>LOL, it's all relative. ;-)
>>
>> True, that is what my auntie said :)
>
><groan>!
>
We aim to please :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scott wrote:
>
> Yeh sounds about right - it was a blizzard so you couldn't see very far,
> but it still didn't stop our taxi driver using the middle lane at 120
> km/h and swerving back and to when approaching cars were also using the
> same lane!
Well yes, some taxi-drivers are crazy around here :(. Luckily even them
pretty well know theier car and how it handles in different weathers.
Sidenote: in blizzard it's hard to see further than the headlights,
since the snow makes a "lightwall" to where the front bumper is, but
you'll get used to it and learn to see through the lightwall.
> I guess it depends how much power your car has and whether you are happy
> to go over the speed while overtaking.
Surely yes. ~250bhp/~350Nm haven't made me to overtake like your taxi
driver :p.
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 27 May 2008 16:46:21 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 27 May 2008 11:33:54 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>
>>Well, I know the recent changes in UK immigration state three criteria -
>>money (to invest), age (lower is better - and I'm over the rather
>>arbitrary age threshold), and a college degree. In the old points
>>system, I was good to go, but they changed all that within the last
>>year. (My wife follows it fairly closely.)
>
> There is a lot of pressure on the politicians to be seen to be doing
> something. Halfwits!
Well, no different than over here, then. ;-)
>>Possibly coming over while employed by a US company would work (it does
>>here in the US - my last boss was a Canadian immigrant, and my current
>>boss lives in Canada).
>
> That's what gave me the thought.
What, you know my boss? ;-)
>>Wow, small world, isn't it? Almost makes me wonder if you know the guy
>>I know there. That'd be weird. IIRC, he said the population was fairly
>>low there...
>
> Well I left the area nearly thirty years ago. If he worked at Burroughs
> there is a chance.
> I was the long haired girlie looking one :)
I'm trying to remember if he did or not - does the name Cloughley ring a
bell?
>>>>> Funny enough I am thinking about leaving the country as it is going
>>>>> to the dogs in a handcart, if you will pardon the mixed metaphor :)
>>>>
>>>>LOL, it's all relative. ;-)
>>>
>>> True, that is what my auntie said :)
>>
>><groan>!
>>
> We aim to please :)
You need to aim better, then. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 27 May 2008 13:51:31 -0400, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Well I left the area nearly thirty years ago. If he worked at Burroughs
>> there is a chance.
>> I was the long haired girlie looking one
>
> I'm trying to remember if he did or not - does the name Cloughley ring a
> bell?
Then again, you might not have known him - he's only around 40 right
now. But maybe his father...
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scott wrote:
> but it still didn't stop our taxi driver using the middle lane at 120
> km/h and swerving back and to when approaching cars were also using the
> same lane!
"See? There's our hotel over there on the left."
"Then why did the driver just pull into the right-turn-only lane?"
"The line's shorter."
"Ah, welcome to China."
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 27 May 2008 13:51:31 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
wrote:
>
>What, you know my boss? ;-)
I've never met your wife :-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 27 May 2008 13:52:18 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
wrote:
>
>Then again, you might not have known him - he's only around 40 right
>now. But maybe his father...
He would have been at primary school when I lived there so I guess
not. And I was not the sort of person fathers admitted to knowing, in
those days. In fact my own father did not like to admit to me ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 27 May 2008 21:22:55 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 27 May 2008 13:52:18 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>
>>Then again, you might not have known him - he's only around 40 right
>>now. But maybe his father...
>
> He would have been at primary school when I lived there so I guess not.
> And I was not the sort of person fathers admitted to knowing, in those
> days. In fact my own father did not like to admit to me ;-)
LOL, I know what you mean....
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 27 May 2008 21:19:45 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 27 May 2008 13:51:31 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>
>>What, you know my boss? ;-)
>
> I've never met your wife :-)
Well, she'd be the first to say that she's not the boss of me. ;-)
Then again, she is sitting in the next room watching episodes of
Gardners' World from 2007 that I've burned to disc for her. I think
she's got 5 DVDs at the moment with that on it.
(And if my boss were out here reading, she'd want to know why I'm doing
this instead of that mailing I said I'd get done today).
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |