|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Darren New" <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote in message
news:47d2f829$1@news.povray.org...
> Gail Shaw wrote:
> > I've never heard of Colossal cave.
>
> AKA "Adventure", aka the first ever computer adventure-style game. (Was
> it the first game at all?)
No idea. First one I remember playing was Asteroids (On a Sharp computer)
sometime around 1984 or so.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Well, two things:
>>
>> 1. It has 2x the spatial resolution in both directions. That doesn't
>> sound particularly earth-shattering, even on paper.
>>
>> 2. I saw two displays side-by-side in a shop. The one marked HD was
>> certainly clearer. But it didn't make me go "wow, that's AMAZING!"
>> Actually it just made me go "oh, OK, so it's 10% more crisp. And you
>> want HOW MANY thousand pounds for this one??"
>
> Thousands of pounds? Maybe 5 years ago.
Or maybe they set the display up next to the most expensive equipment in
the shop?
> I've played X-box games on both my old TV and the new LCD. The difference is
> exceptional. I couldn't even read half the text on the old TV. On the new,
> it's crystal clear.
I've tried connecting my laptop to a normal TV. *Everything* is unreadable!
But then, I sit about 2 feet away from my laptop's screen A TV is
usually at least 12 feet away, if not more...
> Normal DVDs don't show so much difference, but there's still a very
> noticable difference in display quality. I watched the sceen with Gandalf
> and the Balrog of Moria on the new TV and it was sooo clear.
Oddly, whenever I watch DVDs on my PC, I'm astounded by how crappy the
picture looks. Yet on a normal TV it looks perfectly OK. Weird... I
guess the low-quality TV display hides more of the imperfections?
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Orchid XP v7" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
news:47d2f9d5$1@news.povray.org...
>
> I've tried connecting my laptop to a normal TV. *Everything* is
unreadable!
I connected my server to the new TV. Crystal clear, and that's with me
sitting over a meter away.
Here's to computing from the couch.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Orchid XP v7 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> 1. At the time, Doom was reputed to require insanely expensive high-end
>> hardware to run usably.
>
> That would be a 486, yes. It worked in a 386, but 486 was recommended.
SX or DX? ;-)
>> 4. It was slow as hell!
>
> With current computers you could run Doom at 1600x1200 in the original
> software rendering mode without problems (assuming it would support those
> resolutions, which it doesn't, at least not without heavy modifications
> of the source code, AFAIK).
Impressive what 10 years of evolution can do, eh?
And yet, M$ Word is still as slow today as it was all those years ago...
I guess some things never change. :-S
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Nicolas Alvarez" <nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom> wrote in message
news:47d2f8c5$1@news.povray.org...
> > "Nicolas Alvarez" <nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom> wrote in
message
> > news:47d2ddaa$1@news.povray.org...
> >
> >> I don't know anyone (personally, and in the same country as me) who is
> >> geeky enough to know about D&D anyway. So even if it sounded
interesting
> >> to me (which it doesn't), who would I play with?
> >
> > What country do you live in?
> > http://www.treasuretables.org/ways-to-find-rpg-players
>
> ...if I *was* interested, which I'm not...
You never know until you've tried..
(doing best salesperson impersonation)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gail Shaw wrote:
> "Darren New" <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote in message
> news:47d2f829$1@news.povray.org...
>> Gail Shaw wrote:
>>> I've never heard of Colossal cave.
>> AKA "Adventure", aka the first ever computer adventure-style game. (Was
>> it the first game at all?)
>
> No idea. First one I remember playing was Asteroids (On a Sharp computer)
> sometime around 1984 or so.
Adventure was written in 1976, slightly before Apple went into business
at all. The wiki article is actually pretty amusing. I have the source
listing for Adventure 550 in Fortran. :-)
It's certainly the first largely-popular game, in much the same way that
PONG was pretty much the first big video game.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> Gail Shaw wrote:
> > I've never heard of Colossal cave.
> AKA "Adventure", aka the first ever computer adventure-style game. (Was
> it the first game at all?)
Defining what is the "first computer game ever created" is a bit more
difficult than one might thing.
Some argue that the first one was a tennis game someone programmed using
an analog oscilloscope as display in the 1950's.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gail Shaw wrote:
> You never know until you've tried..
> (doing best salesperson impersonation)
Hmm, and I'll bet you've met a lot of salepeople in your line of work
too. ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Orchid XP v7" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
news:47d2fb28$1@news.povray.org...
> Gail Shaw wrote:
>
> > You never know until you've tried..
> > (doing best salesperson impersonation)
>
> Hmm, and I'll bet you've met a lot of salepeople in your line of work
> too. ;-)
None if I can help it.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Hmm, and I'll bet you've met a lot of salepeople in your line of work
>> too. ;-)
>
> None if I can help it.
TELL ME YOUR SECRET!! >_<
I am *so* fed up of that Russian girl trying to sell me AV licenses...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |