alphaQuad wrote:
> Generally some people are right or left brained people. That is, the side you
> use the most, i.e. creative or logical. Now ………….. long dramatic pause.
> 
> What would happen if the hemispheres of your brain were operating on the same
> freq?
> 
> Would you fall over dead? Or be zombified because you now had 0 Amplitude and 0
> Frequency in your head? And what would sync these 2 cranial hemispheres electro
> magnetically? What would be the result? I believe Maxwell had an answer to the
> last question that you were not allowed to know.
> 
> Anyone?
> Else this dies here.
> 
> aQ
> 
> 

Interesting idea, but is the frequency observed in the brain an
operating frequency or just the side effect of the firing neurons? From
what I remember about neural biology, it takes a pretty big external
magnetic source to influence the brain. On the other hand, the EEG
observable frequencies can be manipulated rather easily by meditation,
bio feedback, even sound.

Side note, it's a known problem with EEGs that brain waves do cancel
out. That doesn't seem to cause much problem in the small scale, why
would it cause any problems in the large scale? Except, of course, for
being thought dead if you were connected to an EEG 'just right'.

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:26:32 +0000, Orchid XP v7 wrote:

> I'm pretty sure we've had this conversation before... It basically
> amounts to "I don't know where to start".

You've been given suggestions, though.  Ask people about themselves.  If 
there's one thing that's pretty universally true, it's that people like 
to talk about themselves.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:27:28 +0000, Orchid XP v7 wrote:

> Who said history is the *only* thing I suck at? I'm quite there's quite
> a long list there... :-/

Don't focus on what you suck at, focus on what you're GOOD at.

We all suck at a long laundry list of things.  I suck as a comedian.  I 
suck at building nuclear reactors.  I suck at history.  I suck at talking 
about old-time films with my wife.  I suck at remembering names of people 
I've met.  I suck at freehand drawing.  I suck at playing the accordion.  
I suck at poker.  I suck at keeping my desk uncluttered.  I suck at 
finishing a job I've started (go on, ask me how long we've been working 
on this damned addition on our house, I *dare* you).  I suck at 
medicine.  I suck at doing the laundry.  I suck at washing the dishes.  I 
suck at scooping the cat poop out of the litter boxes.  I suck at being 
patient with our mean cat.  I suck at wicker repair.  I suck at masonry.  
I suck at chemistry.  I suck at physics.  I suck at integral calculus.

I also apparently suck at giving advice.  THAT DOESN'T MEAN I WILL STOP 
TRYING!

(This list is not all-inclusive, by any means)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

Jim Henderson escribió:
> I suck at building nuclear reactors.

How can you say that if you never tried?

(or did you??)

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:11:31 -0200, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:

> Jim Henderson escribió:
>> I suck at building nuclear reactors.
> 
> How can you say that if you never tried?
> 
> (or did you??)

I've got three friends who are PhD's in Nuclear Physics.  But I wouldn't 
even know where to begin in building a reactor (my point being that Andy 
thinks he sucks at things he's never tried, and if that's the criteria, 
then we all suck at even more things <g>)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom> wrote:
> Jim Henderson escribió:
> > I suck at building nuclear reactors.
>
> How can you say that if you never tried?
>
> (or did you??)

ever heard of Chernobyl? ;)

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:06:54 -0500, nemesis wrote:

> Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom> wrote:
>> Jim Henderson escribió:
>> > I suck at building nuclear reactors.
>>
>> How can you say that if you never tried?
>>
>> (or did you??)
> 
> ever heard of Chernobyl? ;)

Shhh!  That's supposed to be a SECRET! ;-)

(Arguably, I've been in Kiev, but that was after Chernobyl happened)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

andrel wrote:
> There will always be statements that can not be proven within a 
> set of axioms and theories.

The one part of this I've never figured out is...


How can you say something is unprovable if you can give a constructive 
proof of how to generate that which you claim your formal system can't 
generate?

It seems either you have to step outside the system to generate the 
unprovable string, or the string really isn't unprovable within the 
system and you're relying on intuition to "prove" it's unprovable.

Can someone clear that bit up for me?




[1] Yes, I bothered to fire up the non-English-character utility this 
time. :-)
-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     On what day did God create the body thetans?

Post a reply to this message

Vincent Le Chevalier wrote:

> and none of the numerous variants in English :-)


with "May" in English (altho of course without the long trailing off "y" 

had to cheat to get D's in French class. Altho, surprisingly, I did 
fairly well when I spent a month in Paris. Overall strange.

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     On what day did God create the body thetans?

Post a reply to this message

andrel wrote:
> You mean that there are no dialects in France?

This is France, where they have government departments to outlaw saying 
things like "le weekend". ;-)

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     On what day did God create the body thetans?

Post a reply to this message