And lo on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:43:33 -0000, Stephen <mcavoysATaolDOTcom>  
did spake, saying:

> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:16:16 -0000, "Phil Cook"
> <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>
>> And lo on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:25:03 -0000, Stephen <mcavoysATaolDOTcom>
>> did spake, saying:
>>
>>> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:46:58 -0000, "Phil Cook"
>>> <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Blasphemer! Stone them, stone them!
>>>
>>> Why should the Blasphemers get all the fun :)
>>
>> Just one (other) mistranslation and things could have been so different
>> "As punishment for your blasphemy, and as prescribed by our Holy Book,  
>> you
>> must smoke your way through this entire baggie of grass until you are
>> thoroughly stoned"
>
> They don't call me Saint Stephen for nothing.
>
> Actually they don't call me Saint Stephen at all, at all :)

Ah St. St. so good they named him twice:-P

>>> A friend of mine explained it perfectly saying.
>>> "When you're dead, you're dead"
>>> That works for me.
>>
>> Unless you're a zombie, or a ghost, or a vampire, or a werewolf... oh  
>> wait
>> that last one's just stupid; werewolves aren't dead.
>
> Are you some sort of ist? What do you have against Duppies?

Nothing, I think they're great for an aquarium.

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com

Post a reply to this message

"Phil Cook" <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
> > They don't call me Saint Stephen for nothing.
> >
> > Actually they don't call me Saint Stephen at all, at all :)
>
> Ah St. St. so good they named him twice:-P

It's the same as with other titles. The more Saints he get the more miracles he
can do, am I right? ;)
Isn't there a book talking about Saint Stephen?

Regards
       bluetree

Post a reply to this message

And lo on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:04:34 -0000, bluetree <nomail@nomail> did  
spake, saying:

> "Phil Cook" <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>> > They don't call me Saint Stephen for nothing.
>> >
>> > Actually they don't call me Saint Stephen at all, at all :)
>>
>> Ah St. St. so good they named him twice:-P
>
> It's the same as with other titles. The more Saints he get the more  
> miracles he
> can do, am I right? ;)

So miraculous they named a road after him - St. St. St.

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com

Post a reply to this message

And lo on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:39:48 -0000, bluetree <nomail@nomail> did  
spake, saying:

> "Phil Cook" <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>
>> > So b) wouldn't have free will.
>>
>> Except they realise they don't want to be there, thus have free will.
>> Unless you're saying that people in prison don't have free will?
>
> ^^
> Prisoner: I have a free will.
> Prison guard: Yes, I do not deny.
> Prisoner: My free will is, that I want to be free and go outside.
> Prison guard: You are free, we just improsioned your will. :)
>
> Whew. Strange diaglogue.

Except in the case of Heaven they thought they wanted to be there; a bit  
like Fawlty Towers I suppose.

> At least I found the reason: Your showel was too hard.
> No, no, don't flail again. :)

That's okay John's flown off with and I don't have another Shovel +2  
Against Reason as blessed by L Ron Hubbard lying around. I could just wrap  
some wires around the handle of a different shovel say it detects "Thetan  
Radiation" and try that if you like?

>> Yup you can only get into Heaven via your free will at which point you  
>> lose it.
>> Hold on I'll get a shovel it'll all make sense in a minute.
>
> Heaven-one-way ticket. ;)

Bloody GWR and you'd paid for an annual season ticket too.

> Is there a point, where you are able to choose between different  
> stations?

Sort of makes you wonder what happens if you get on the wrong train. Ah  
Rowan Atkinson as the Devil guiding people to Hell.

"Christians? Christians this way please; yes the Jews were right"

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com

Post a reply to this message

"Phil Cook" <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
> > Whew. Strange diaglogue.
>
> Except in the case of Heaven they thought they wanted to be there; a bit
> like Fawlty Towers I suppose.

Then I don't want to check in please.

> > At least I found the reason: Your showel was too hard.
> > No, no, don't flail again. :)
>
> That's okay John's flown off with and I don't have another Shovel +2
> Against Reason as blessed by L Ron Hubbard lying around. I could just wrap
> some wires around the handle of a different shovel say it detects "Thetan
> Radiation" and try that if you like?

Hihi, won't work, because I have an atheistic shield +20. :P

> >> Yup you can only get into Heaven via your free will at which point you
> >> lose it.
> >> Hold on I'll get a shovel it'll all make sense in a minute.
> >
> > Heaven-one-way ticket. ;)

Annual season ticket for one way, that's not fair!!

> Bloody GWR and you'd paid for an annual season ticket too.
>
> > Is there a point, where you are able to choose between different
> > stations?
>
> Sort of makes you wonder what happens if you get on the wrong train. Ah
> Rowan Atkinson as the Devil guiding people to Hell.
>
> "Christians? Christians this way please; yes the Jews were right"

^^
And at last it leads to the question: Is there free will in hell? ;)

Regards

             bluetree

Post a reply to this message

Phil Cook wrote:
> There's a precedent.

My understanding is that angels don't have free will. I could be wrong 
on that, tho. Anybody got a chapter/verse on it?

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     On what day did God create the body thetans?

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:53:00 -0000, "Phil Cook"
<phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:

>And lo on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:43:33 -0000, Stephen <mcavoysATaolDOTcom>  
>did spake, saying:
>
>> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:16:16 -0000, "Phil Cook"
>> <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>>
>>> And lo on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:25:03 -0000, Stephen <mcavoysATaolDOTcom>
>>> did spake, saying:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:46:58 -0000, "Phil Cook"
>>>> <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Blasphemer! Stone them, stone them!
>>>>
>>>> Why should the Blasphemers get all the fun :)
>>>
>>> Just one (other) mistranslation and things could have been so different
>>> "As punishment for your blasphemy, and as prescribed by our Holy Book,  
>>> you
>>> must smoke your way through this entire baggie of grass until you are
>>> thoroughly stoned"
>>
>> They don't call me Saint Stephen for nothing.
>>
>> Actually they don't call me Saint Stephen at all, at all :)
>
>Ah St. St. so good they named him twice:-P
>

LOL (in a Welsh accent)


>>> Unless you're a zombie, or a ghost, or a vampire, or a werewolf... oh  
>>> wait
>>> that last one's just stupid; werewolves aren't dead.
>>
>> Are you some sort of ist? What do you have against Duppies?
>
>Nothing, I think they're great for an aquarium.
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duppy

Regards
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

???... does all this mean that I get to mess up my wings?

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:20:48 -0000, "Phil Cook"
<phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:

>And lo on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:04:34 -0000, bluetree <nomail@nomail> did  
>spake, saying:
>
>> "Phil Cook" <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>>> > They don't call me Saint Stephen for nothing.
>>> >
>>> > Actually they don't call me Saint Stephen at all, at all :)
>>>
>>> Ah St. St. so good they named him twice:-P
>>
>> It's the same as with other titles. The more Saints he get the more  
>> miracles he
>> can do, am I right? ;)
>
>So miraculous they named a road after him - St. St. St.
>
>-- 
>Phil Cook

I'm still here you know. I do take sugar.

Regards
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen <mcavoysATaolDOTcom@> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:20:48 -0000, "Phil Cook"
> <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>
> >And lo on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:04:34 -0000, bluetree <nomail@nomail> did
> >spake, saying:
> >
> >> "Phil Cook" <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
> >>> > They don't call me Saint Stephen for nothing.
> >>> >
> >>> > Actually they don't call me Saint Stephen at all, at all :)
> >>>
> >>> Ah St. St. so good they named him twice:-P
> >>
> >> It's the same as with other titles. The more Saints he get the more
> >> miracles he
> >> can do, am I right? ;)
> >
> >So miraculous they named a road after him - St. St. St.
> >
> >--
> >Phil Cook
>
> I'm still here you know. I do take sugar.
>
> Regards
>  Stephen


Sorry! It's only respect not to talk directly to a Saint. :)
Does he also take some milk? <- really not respectless dear Sir Saint Stephen,
I hope, he won't get angry... ;)

Regards
             bluetree

Post a reply to this message