|
 |
Darren New wrote:
> Tim Cook wrote:
>> Hello Big Brother, you say, but *I* say...it would be interesting to
>> take the data and average each set to get a composite 'American' of
>> each gender.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nice6NYb_WA
Yah but the dataset is only 200...I'd want more, and of a wider variety
of faces, just on matter of principle.
You can kinda do the face morphing thing in Poser, but not very well. I
want a high-end program like that youtube video.
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.digitalartsuk.com
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
And lo on Sun, 23 Dec 2007 12:12:12 -0000, Rune <aut### [at] runevision com>
did spake, saying:
>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/21/AR2007122102544_pf.html
>
> The FBI will also retain, upon request by employers, the
> fingerprints of employees who have undergone criminal background checks
> so the employers can be notified if employees have brushes with the law."
"upon request of *employers*" exsqueeze me? So are the employers going to
send in data for people they're thinking of hiring (dependant on
background checks) then notify the FBI of the one(s) they're hiring for
retention purposes or are they just going to not bother updating the list
and thus receive such information about everyone they're ever interviewed?
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
