 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Well, this is the first animation I've made that I deem fit for public
viewing - entirely abstract, very simple and its obvious I'm new to this, so
go gently... (and ok, it's not just a simple white sphere)
Any and all comments greatly appreciated.
http://www.soware.co.uk/POVRay/Colours/ColoursHi.avi (800x600x32 ~ 23.7MB)
http://www.soware.co.uk/POVRay/Colours/ColoursLow.avi (320x240x24 ~ 1.5MB)
Both videos are XVid encoded (2-Pass), so should be fairly playable on most
platforms. (Incidentally, I'm using FadeToBlack for this - stitching the
images/encoding - if anyone knows of a better one for Windows, please let me
know - I've only got 18 trial days left...)
Regards,
Simon
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nifty! (and more than fit for public viewing)
It works quite well as is AND could serve as the basis for a variety of
interesting expansions and variations. Congrats.
Regards,
Mike C.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks! I have to admit I was thinking of doing lots of animations all
starting/ending with the same sphere then mixing/matching them into a clip
of some kind. Failing hat, maybe turning it into a convenient colour chart -
If only I could get ti to render in realtime...
> Nifty! (and more than fit for public viewing)
> It works quite well as is AND could serve as the basis for a variety of
> interesting expansions and variations. Congrats.
> Regards,
> Mike C.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Simon wrote:
> Well, this is the first animation I've made that I deem fit for public
> viewing - entirely abstract, very simple and its obvious I'm new to this, so
> go gently... (and ok, it's not just a simple white sphere)
It's a heck of a lot nicer than any animation I've ever made. :-)
--
William Tracy
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|a|f|i|s|h|i|o|n|a|d|o|@|g|m|a|i|l|.|c|o|m|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|w|t|r|a|c|y|@|c|a|l|p|o|l|y|.|e|d|u|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
You know you've been raytracing too long when a co-worker nearly kills
himself over losing an hour's worth of work after a computer crash, and
you just calmly shrug your shoulders and say, "Is that all?"
Taps a.k.a. Tapio Vocadlo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Simon" <povray@NOSPAM|SOWare.co.uk> wrote:
> Both videos are XVid encoded (2-Pass), so should be fairly playable on most
> platforms.
Can't see the XVid, sorry...
> (Incidentally, I'm using FadeToBlack for this - stitching the
> images/encoding - if anyone knows of a better one for Windows, please let me
> know - I've only got 18 trial days left...)
A free alternative is Virtual Dub -- pretty bare bones, but it'll slap your
images together in an AVI. For fancy editing, you're gonna have to shell
out a few bucks :/
--
Dan
GoofyGraffix.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi Dan,
Can I ask what OS/Player you're using? Just curious as I was under the
(mistaken?) mimpression that XVid was fairly universal nowadays... Whenever
I have tme, I'm going to Flash encode them (the way youTube do) then publish
them that way - EVERYONE can get flash and it's actually a little easier oin
bandwidth
> Can't see the XVid, sorry...
>
> A free alternative is Virtual Dub -- pretty bare bones, but it'll slap
> your
> images together in an AVI. For fancy editing, you're gonna have to shell
> out a few bucks :/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Simon" <povray@NOSPAM|SOWare.co.uk> wrote:
> Both videos are XVid encoded (2-Pass), so should be fairly playable on most
> platforms. (Incidentally, I'm using FadeToBlack for this - stitching the
> images/encoding - if anyone knows of a better one for Windows, please let me
> know - I've only got 18 trial days left...)
I use TMPEGenc which I like. If you want to encode png files you will need
to download an extra plugin.
http://www.tmpgenc.net/
A very nice first animation BTW.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Simon wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Can I ask what OS/Player you're using? Just curious as I was under the
> (mistaken?) mimpression that XVid was fairly universal nowadays... Whenever
> I have tme, I'm going to Flash encode them (the way youTube do) then publish
> them that way - EVERYONE can get flash and it's actually a little easier oin
> bandwidth
Actually no. There's still _no_ 64-bit flash player for Linux available.
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethis zbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And the 32-bit version won't run in a 64-bit environment? I have to admit my
Linux knowledge is rusty so could be completely wrong but I was under the
impression that processes could be started in a 32-bit emulation mode?
> Actually no. There's still _no_ 64-bit flash player for Linux available.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Simon wrote:
> And the 32-bit version won't run in a 64-bit environment? I have to admit my
> Linux knowledge is rusty so could be completely wrong but I was under the
> impression that processes could be started in a 32-bit emulation mode?
The 32-bit version runs fine *if* you have a 32-bit browser (running
under 32-bit emulation mode, of course). It doesn't work with 64-bit
browsers.
Now, the *real* issue is that there's no Flash for Linux/PPC,
Linux/Sparc, or Linux/anything-other-than-Intel-compatible-chips.
Install Linux on a pre-Intel Mac? No Flash for you.
--
William Tracy
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|a|f|i|s|h|i|o|n|a|d|o|@|g|m|a|i|l|.|c|o|m|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|w|t|r|a|c|y|@|c|a|l|p|o|l|y|.|e|d|u|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
You know you've been raytracing too long when your personal
correspondence to friends starts out with #Dear Linda =
Ken Tyler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
