 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 14:24:53 -0800, Darren New <dne### [at] san rrcom>
wrote:
>IMBJR wrote:
>> No. Re-read
>
>I rest my case. :-)
You are some sort of legal representative now are you? Hello, this is
a usnet discussion not some legal process. Dear me. Keep track. Stop
letting you mind wander.
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 14:28:02 -0800, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
wrote:
>IMBJR wrote:
>> Splitting hairs to that degree is making you look pointless.
>
>I was merely pointing out an incorrect statement you made. That it
>wasn't germane to the argument your making is irrelevant. Not every
>statement made on a news server, even as a follow up to one of your
>posts, must be targetted at you.
But that does not stop me from replying. Tis the nature of usenet.
Deal with it.
>
>> Come on,
>> better reasoning and arguments next time please.
>
>I find that you summarily ignore any arguments that anyone else puts
>forth, responding with insults instead, and admonitions that anyone
>disagreeing must really not be paying attention, because you're so
>obviously right. So what's the point? At this point, it's a religious
>war, and the rest of us are the heathens.
Now you are being plain silly. To call forth religion in this manner
is probably insulting those with beliefs too.
Just take a deep breath and re-read. This time, really re-read.
Quietly. To yourself. No mumbling. Understand.
Then you will see I have stated my case logically. I cannot then help
it if I have to then deal with the wave of apathy that came at me. I
call a spade a spade and there are certainly some of these around
these parts.
Besides, this is all moot. Apparently, there is no prohibition from
posting JPEG2000 after all. I - sort of - win.
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 17:27:59 -0500, Tyler Eaves <tyl### [at] NOSPAMml1net>
wrote:
>On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 22:24:01 +0000, IMBJR wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 14:03:42 -0800, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>IMBJR wrote:
>>>> PNG does indeed give large files and I feel this is maddening because
>>>> some of use still use dial-up modems.
>>>
>>>But high-speed access is available lots of places! Why would we nanny
>>>people on dial-up modems? You're just too lazy to pay for cable, obviously.
>>
>> I live in an area where the telco has seen fit not to cover properly.
>
>I think that's exactly as much of a problem as you think my choice of
>computing platform is.
Mmm, beg to differ. There's a big difference between no availability
and limited availability. One is nothing, the other is something.
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 14:29:30 -0800, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
wrote:
>IMBJR wrote:
>> I live in an area where the telco has seen fit not to cover properly.
>
>What? Surely if enough consumers demand it, the telco will provide it! I
>mean, clearly the demand is there. You're just too lazy.
Hey, parrot boy. Come up with something a little more original than
that. That's just first-grade heckling.
PS. This is indeed how it works - demand targets are set by the telco,
but actually the technology will just not cover my home area.
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I - sort of - win.
And you must feel very - sort of - proud now ;-)
Severi S.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
IMBJR <no### [at] spamhere> wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 14:29:30 -0800, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
> wrote:
>
>>IMBJR wrote:
>>> I live in an area where the telco has seen fit not to cover properly.
>>
>>What? Surely if enough consumers demand it, the telco will provide it! I
>>mean, clearly the demand is there. You're just too lazy.
>
> Hey, parrot boy. Come up with something a little more original than
> that. That's just first-grade heckling.
>
> PS. This is indeed how it works - demand targets are set by the telco,
> but actually the technology will just not cover my home area.
Looks like you drew the short straw when they were handing out broadband
coverage then.
-Eamon
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 7 Mar 2004 17:31:00 -0500, Tom Galvin <tom### [at] imporg> wrote:
>Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in news:404B9EDA.1637618C@pacbell.net:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Trying toning it down a bit, please.
>>
>
>
>Such restraint. Must be another gorgeous day on the west coast ;) I'll
>take the cue from you and stop feeding the troll.
So you need to be told what to do by others?
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 7 Mar 2004 17:31:00 -0500, Tom Galvin <tom### [at] imporg> wrote:
>Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in news:404B9EDA.1637618C@pacbell.net:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Trying toning it down a bit, please.
>>
>
>
>Such restraint. Must be another gorgeous day on the west coast ;) I'll
>take the cue from you and stop feeding the troll.
PS. Troll indeed. Such a lazy labelling. Fine, if that's what makes
your dillusion complete - go ahead. Ignore my points, fine. They were
perfectly valid - just delivered in a tone that hurt little ears could
not take.
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 00:41:48 +0200, Severi Salminen
<sev### [at] NOT_THISsibafi> wrote:
>> I - sort of - win.
>
>And you must feel very - sort of - proud now ;-)
Don't be so silly. Why must you make such silly remarks? Are you that
childish that you can't resist making such silly little pokes at
people? Grow up. Dear me. No wonder the quality of debate around here
is severely lacking if that's all you are capable of.
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 7 Mar 2004 17:50:32 -0500, Eamon Caddigan <eca### [at] uiucedu>
wrote:
>IMBJR <no### [at] spamhere> wrote:
>> On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 14:29:30 -0800, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>IMBJR wrote:
>>>> I live in an area where the telco has seen fit not to cover properly.
>>>
>>>What? Surely if enough consumers demand it, the telco will provide it! I
>>>mean, clearly the demand is there. You're just too lazy.
>>
>> Hey, parrot boy. Come up with something a little more original than
>> that. That's just first-grade heckling.
>>
>> PS. This is indeed how it works - demand targets are set by the telco,
>> but actually the technology will just not cover my home area.
>
>Looks like you drew the short straw when they were handing out broadband
>coverage then.
Damn straight I did. I'm ever so slightly out of range. It's a pain in
the bum for sure - otherwise I'd be able to publish much large
projects involving animation.
>
>-Eamon
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
