POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : Procedural realistic mountain ranges? Server Time
3 May 2024 00:17:13 EDT (-0400)
  Procedural realistic mountain ranges? (Message 21 to 30 of 35)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 5 Messages >>>
From: clipka
Subject: Re: Procedural realistic mountain ranges?
Date: 30 Dec 2017 21:16:01
Message: <5a484861$1@news.povray.org>
Am 30.12.2017 um 17:00 schrieb Stephen:
> On 30/12/2017 12:35, clipka wrote:
>> https://youtu.be/tc2tDFPlyWY?t=1h51m5s
>>
>> /Some/  day I'll teach you folks to specify the version number when
>> reporting an issue;)
> 
> 
> That's a bit subtle, for us.

"Ich verlange ordentliche Meldungen, verdammt nochmal!" is the quote of
the day for Yadgar.

As for you Tommies, ask the folks at Bletchley Park to deciper it :P

https://youtu.be/a5T7LPYVo0Q?t=2h7m34s

> Just say what you mean before we grow beards. ;)

https://youtu.be/7pzKyeIex2Y?t=1m5s


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Procedural realistic mountain ranges?
Date: 31 Dec 2017 04:29:49
Message: <5a48ae0d$1@news.povray.org>
On 31/12/2017 02:16, clipka wrote:
> Am 30.12.2017 um 17:00 schrieb Stephen:
>> On 30/12/2017 12:35, clipka wrote:
>>> https://youtu.be/tc2tDFPlyWY?t=1h51m5s
>>>
>>> /Some/  day I'll teach you folks to specify the version number when
>>> reporting an issue;)
>>
>>
>> That's a bit subtle, for us.
> 
> "Ich verlange ordentliche Meldungen, verdammt nochmal!" is the quote of
> the day for Yadgar.
> 
> As for you Tommies, ask the folks at Bletchley Park to deciper it :P
> 

Oh! dear. A year ago we could have asked Dr John. :(


> https://youtu.be/a5T7LPYVo0Q?t=2h7m34s
> 
>> Just say what you mean before we grow beards. ;)
> 
> https://youtu.be/7pzKyeIex2Y?t=1m5s
> 

See! I was paying attention.


-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: clipka
Subject: Re: Procedural realistic mountain ranges?
Date: 31 Dec 2017 07:50:34
Message: <5a48dd1a$1@news.povray.org>
Am 31.12.2017 um 10:29 schrieb Stephen:
> On 31/12/2017 02:16, clipka wrote:
>> Am 30.12.2017 um 17:00 schrieb Stephen:
>>> On 30/12/2017 12:35, clipka wrote:
>>>> https://youtu.be/tc2tDFPlyWY?t=1h51m5s
>>>>
>>>> /Some/  day I'll teach you folks to specify the version number when
>>>> reporting an issue;)
>>>
>>>
>>> That's a bit subtle, for us.
>>
>> "Ich verlange ordentliche Meldungen, verdammt nochmal!" is the quote of
>> the day for Yadgar.
>>
>> As for you Tommies, ask the folks at Bletchley Park to deciper it :P
>>
> 
> Oh! dear. A year ago we could have asked Dr John. :(

"I demand proper [damage] reports, dammit!"


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Procedural realistic mountain ranges?
Date: 31 Dec 2017 14:05:22
Message: <5a4934f2$1@news.povray.org>
On 31/12/2017 12:50, clipka wrote:
> Am 31.12.2017 um 10:29 schrieb Stephen:
>> On 31/12/2017 02:16, clipka wrote:
>>> Am 30.12.2017 um 17:00 schrieb Stephen:
>>>> On 30/12/2017 12:35, clipka wrote:
>>>>> https://youtu.be/tc2tDFPlyWY?t=1h51m5s
>>>>>
>>>>> /Some/  day I'll teach you folks to specify the version number when
>>>>> reporting an issue;)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's a bit subtle, for us.
>>>
>>> "Ich verlange ordentliche Meldungen, verdammt nochmal!" is the quote of
>>> the day for Yadgar.
>>>
>>> As for you Tommies, ask the folks at Bletchley Park to deciper it :P
>>>
>>
>> Oh! dear. A year ago we could have asked Dr John. :(
> 
> "I demand proper [damage] reports, dammit!"
> 

So you have said. But you missed that little word that every good boy 
uses. "Please!"
Now is that so hard? :P

-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: clipka
Subject: Re: Procedural realistic mountain ranges?
Date: 31 Dec 2017 17:59:09
Message: <5a496bbd$1@news.povray.org>
Am 31.12.2017 um 20:05 schrieb Stephen:

>> "I demand proper [damage] reports, dammit!"
>>
> 
> So you have said. But you missed that little word that every good boy
> uses. "Please!"
> Now is that so hard? :P

"I demand you do as I please me, dammit!"

That better? ;)


Post a reply to this message

From: Bald Eagle
Subject: Re: Procedural realistic mountain ranges?
Date: 31 Dec 2017 18:00:00
Message: <web.5a496b057060b5205cafe28e0@news.povray.org>
Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:

> So you have said. But you missed that little word that every good boy
> uses. "Please!"
> Now is that so hard? :P

(Scratching his beard in perplexity...)
Is what so hard?

What broke _now_?
And whose fault is it?


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Procedural realistic mountain ranges?
Date: 1 Jan 2018 07:08:57
Message: <5a4a24d9$1@news.povray.org>
On 31/12/2017 22:59, clipka wrote:
> Am 31.12.2017 um 20:05 schrieb Stephen:
> 
>>> "I demand proper [damage] reports, dammit!"
>>>
>>
>> So you have said. But you missed that little word that every good boy
>> uses. "Please!"
>> Now is that so hard? :P
> 
> "I demand you do as I please me, dammit!"
> 
> That better? ;)
> 

Yes, much better.

NURSE!

-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Leroy
Subject: Re: Procedural realistic mountain ranges?
Date: 1 Jan 2018 12:15:03
Message: <web.5a4a6c197060b520d2fb7cb80@news.povray.org>
>
> Not really useful, at least not in its current development stage - no
> zoom view and therefore no chance to exactly place the cursor. Perhaps
> it is because I used Windows 7 rather than XP, I don't know...
>
> The fine editor (the second program) is not even downloadable at all!
>
> Nevertheless, thanks for your tip!
>
> See you in Khyberspace!
>
> Yadgar

I don't know why it didn't download for you. I just downloaded it.
Must been the free web site's problem.
Yea, No Zoom, But you can use the arrow Keys to position the mouse where needed.
I did say as a last resort. Those programs are old and they where really made
for small height fields.
Hope you find what ya need.
Have Fun1


Post a reply to this message

From: Leroy
Subject: Re: Procedural realistic mountain ranges?
Date: 1 Jan 2018 13:05:00
Message: <web.5a4a77e47060b520416551fc0@news.povray.org>
clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> Am 27.12.2017 um 21:52 schrieb Leroy:
>
> > As a last resort:
> > I have 3 programs at my site that helps make height fields and place objects on
> > them. They where All wrote for my old Win98, but they run on my new WinXP.
>
> "new WinXP"???
>
> Ouch.
I seriously thought about putting the 'new' in quotes. I know I have a problem
with updating to newer versions of windows. Its not only the cost. Nor the time
and effort getting everything back to usable. Its a mater of philosophy, I'm a
carpenter by trade and I have tools that have lasted me for 30 years or more.
Maybe I'm just getting old. My first 'computer' was commodore Vic20, then the
64, and finally the IBM desk top with Win3.1 on it. That IBM I upgraded over the
years until I have an all new computer! Charley, the owner of the store(Software
Center) where I got the computer and bought my upgrades slip Win98 on it.
 I guess what I'm try to say is that I'm not afraid of change. But I can't see
upgrading an operating system every year, or two, or three.

Sorry for the rant, Have Fun!


Post a reply to this message

From: Bald Eagle
Subject: Re: Procedural realistic mountain ranges?
Date: 1 Jan 2018 21:00:01
Message: <web.5a4ae6e37060b5205cafe28e0@news.povray.org>
"Leroy" <whe### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> I know I have a problem
> with updating to newer versions of windows. Its not only the cost.

I can't ever remember when i actually paid for a copy of the OS, unless it was
part of the cost of the bundle with the brand new computer itself.

> Nor the time
> and effort getting everything back to usable.

Yeah - 'cause those software developer guys have to changing everything to make
it "better"   :D


> Maybe I'm just getting old.

Pfft.  Don't know what you're talking about.   NOBODY here is old.
Probably just forgot to take your medication this morning.   Or up the dose.
;)

> My first 'computer' was commodore Vic20, then the
> 64, and finally the IBM desk top with Win3.1 on it. That IBM I upgraded over the
> years until I have an all new computer!

I started with a Timex Sinclair 1000, then I got a VIC-20 (which I loved), sold
that and got an Atari 800 XL, and then it wasn't until years later that I got an
HP desktop.  My first upgrade was to an impossibly huge 640 MB HDD  :D   "You'll
NEVER fill that!"

> But I can't see
> upgrading an operating system every year, or two, or three.

Indeed.  Especially since sometimes the new one really really sucks.


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 5 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.