 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
When I first read the subject I was thinking you were going to suggest
everyone brings there computer and set up a small render farm. Then we watch
line by line as a high radiosity, photon usin', focal blurred, isosurface
ridden picture gets rendered :)
Corey
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tony[B] wrote:
> Me too! :) I pick Gilles Tran and Mick Hazelgrove for my team. ;)
>
Which part of "Once the competition is about to begin teams are selected
at random from the numbers they were given" didn't you understand ?
--
/*Francois Labreque*/#local a=x+y;#local b=x+a;#local c=a+b;#macro P(F//
/* flabreque */L)polygon{5,F,F+z,L+z,L,F pigment{rgb 9}}#end union
/* @ */{P(0,a)P(a,b)P(b,c)P(2*a,2*b)P(2*b,b+c)P(b+c,<2,3>)
/* videotron.ca */}camera{location<6,1.25,-6>look_at a orthographic}
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 00:05:04 +0100, "Dave Brickell"
<d.b### [at] ntlworldnospam com> wrote:
>I was just sat here pondering an idea. Has anyone ever organised a
>raytracing version of a lan party?
I once tried to but the immigration authorities spoiled the party just
when it was getting interesting (i.e. rendering reached the relevant
part of the pictures). What we hadn't thought of was that contestants'
travel permits were for one month only :(
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vipbg
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> When I first read the subject I was thinking you were going to suggest
> everyone brings there computer and set up a small render farm. Then we
watch
> line by line as a high radiosity, photon usin', focal blurred, isosurface
> ridden picture gets rendered :)
I would be fascinated to watch that :-)
#include "BIG_SMILEY_FACE.inc"
--
__________________
RAY
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The spread of people using POV is something that did not cross my mind when
I first thought up the idea. And imigration was something else I never even
considered. It is amazing how a news group can make you feel all so close
when in reality people are spread far and wide.
What Apache earlier on in this thread may be worth considering though, have
a version of the IRTC for POV-Ray users only. I know the the majority of
users that enter the IRTC do use POV-Ray but it is also open to other
renderers such as 3DS Max. I dont know how much interest there would be in
something like this, or whether we could make it different enough from the
IRTC to gain some interest.
I have some web design experience and could possibly get some nice web space
for such a project. It all depends on the demand for such a thing.
Thoughts and comments please.
Dave.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Thoughts and comments please.
I think Mr. Popov was (sort of) joking...
:)
Jamie.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Maybe, but my thoughts still stand.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I'd definetely be interested, but for the competition to be really worth
the amount of work some people would have to put into it, there
should be a better feedback. I don't mean viewers to entrants,
but entrants to interested. I find many POV-entries lack a good
description of what's done, and how its done. Best example is
John VanSickle's Rusty. You always get the same text:
Slapped some code together, like I always do.
I mean, who can learn from that? I do think he does a great job, and
I do know that when submitting something to the IRTC, you've mostly
got not enough time left to actually write everything you did.
That's why I'd say that winners would have to write something
like a "making-of". Its the only way one can learn from others,
especially ones that have done better in the competition.
And then I'd say there had to be a "special issues" selection, where
the competition gathers, from winners images, how clouds are done
fast and good-looking, how the lighting is made to look near-realistic
and stuff like that. Just using the competition as a database, you know?
And perhaps a little more "linkability". Like, when you look at the
images of the winners, you have a link to their homepage to click on,
so that you don't have to download the scene-description and look,
if he has one at all.
Just some thoughts, there's a lot more I could think about, but I think
you're getting the idea of what I'm after.
Dave Brickell wrote:
> The spread of people using POV is something that did not cross my mind when
> I first thought up the idea. And imigration was something else I never even
> considered. It is amazing how a news group can make you feel all so close
> when in reality people are spread far and wide.
>
> What Apache earlier on in this thread may be worth considering though, have
> a version of the IRTC for POV-Ray users only. I know the the majority of
> users that enter the IRTC do use POV-Ray but it is also open to other
> renderers such as 3DS Max. I dont know how much interest there would be in
> something like this, or whether we could make it different enough from the
> IRTC to gain some interest.
>
> I have some web design experience and could possibly get some nice web space
> for such a project. It all depends on the demand for such a thing.
>
> Thoughts and comments please.
>
> Dave.
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmxde
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yes, I do it with my brother every now and then... unfortunately, he's still
17 years old, and his math abilities are still not very powerful for what he
wants to do, generally. So sometimes we agree that I'm not allowed to use a
modeller, whereas he is.
We have had plenty of fun competing with POV.
Fernando.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Fernando Gonzalez del Cueto" <fcu### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
news:3cc25b7f$1@news.povray.org...
> Yes, I do it with my brother every now and then... unfortunately, he's
still
> 17 years old, and his math abilities are still not very powerful for what
he
He's still 17 years old??? That sounds like he hasn't had the guts to grow
older... He he he... I really meant: "he's only 17 years old"... he he he...
Fernando.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
