 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001 17:22:01 -0400, Greg M. Johnson wrote:
> Chris Cason wrote:
>
>> 1) Whether the idea as a whole sucks or not;
>
> It does but some of us might purchase it anyway out of loyalty and pity...
>
Elaborate, please. Why does it suck? What do you mean by pity?
--
#macro R(P)z+_(P)_(P)_(P+1)_(P+1)+z#end#macro Q(C)bicubic_patch{type 1u_steps 6
v_steps 6R(1)R(3)R(5)R(7)translate 9*z-2pigment{rgb z}}#end#macro _(Y)#local X=
asc(substr(C,Y,1))-65;<mod(X,4)div(X,4)>#end#local O=union{Q("ABEFUQWS")Q(// RON
"WSXTLOJN")}Q("JNKLCGCD")union{O}union{O translate 3*x}light_source{x 1}//PARKER
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This has probably all ready been mentioned, but what about
http://www.cafepress.com
?
- Kevin
----------------------------------------------------------
"We can lick gravity, but sometimes the
paperwork is overwhelming."
- Wernher Von Braun, rocketry pioneer
"Chris Cason" <newsadmin-despam-@povray-no-spam.org> wrote in message
news:3bd706ca@news.povray.org...
>
> "Alan Holding" <man### [at] btopenworld com> wrote in message
news:3bd6fd0d@news.povray.org...
> > How about a mouse mat?
>
> Same problem with setup costs.
>
> -- Chris
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Good idea.
I'll take number 2 or an unpainted number 5 (too garish w/ paint!). At
least one, probably several.
Chris Cason wrote:
<snip>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Chris Cason" <newsadmin-despam-@povray-no-spam.org> wrote in message
news:3bd706c8@news.povray.org...
> > I like #2 most. But I'd like to see the others with no paint, I might
change
> > my mind (guess #5 would be good in pure metal). YKYHBRTLW is excellent.
I
> > don't know about brass though... Imho Pov need's something techno like
steel
> > or aluminum.
>
> The finish will be similar in appearance to chrome. You never see the
brass (it's
> inside the plating).
>
> -- Chris
Drooool ! ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Chris Cason" <newsadmin-despam-@povray-no-spam.org> wrote in message
news:3bd6e439@news.povray.org...
> 1) Whether the idea as a whole sucks or not;
No. I think It's a good idea.
>
> 2) If not, then if you would purchase one (cost unknown at this stage,
> but I wouldn't expect that it would be more than US$20, and probably
> less).
Yes.
>
> 3) Which of the abovementioned designs attract you the most/least.
Number 2 and then 1.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"T.Paul Althauser" <pau### [at] dnaicom> wrote in message
news:3BD### [at] dnaicom...
> I'll take number 2 or an unpainted number 5 (too garish w/ paint!). At
> least one, probably several.
I've put up a version of this without paint for folks to see. Same URL.
-- Chris
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chris Cason wrote:
>
> 1) Whether the idea as a whole sucks or not;
I rather like it.
> 2) If not, then if you would purchase one (cost unknown at this stage,
> but I wouldn't expect that it would be more than US$20, and probably
> less).
One very probably, perhaps two depending on price
and shipping costs.
> 3) Which of the abovementioned designs attract you the most/least.
Keep it simple, please. I like the second.
But I think a rather simple circle with the logo would to it.
No colors please, too easily damaged.
The size you mentioned (around 7 cm) is a bit too
big for me (but I'll probably buy anyway).
I think the logo in a simple 4 cm circle is right
for my usage.
--
Adrien Beau adr### [at] freefr http://adrien.beau.free.fr/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 25 Oct 2001 01:54:28 +1000, Chris Cason wrote:
[...]
> I'd like to hear from users about the following:
> 1) Whether the idea as a whole sucks or not;
I think it's a good idea.
> 2) If not, then if you would purchase one (cost unknown at this stage,
> but I wouldn't expect that it would be more than US$20, and probably
> less).
It depends on the final price. Given the current $AUS - $US exchange
rate, (ie, totally abysmal!) I may not be able to justify or afford one.
(Right now, $US20 ~= $AUS40)
> 3) Which of the abovementioned designs attract you the most/least.
Currently #2 and #6 (the words with no colours)
> -- Chris
Steve
--
Stephen Oxley, Shared Systems Section,
Room G44, Building 28, Clayton Campus
Monash University, Victoria, Australia, 3800
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
in article 3bd6e439@news.povray.org, Chris Cason at
newsadmin-despam-@povray-no-spam.org wrote on 10/24/01 10:54 AM:
> 1) Whether the idea as a whole sucks or not;
>
> 2) If not, then if you would purchase one (cost unknown at this stage,
> but I wouldn't expect that it would be more than US$20, and probably
> less).
>
> 3) Which of the abovementioned designs attract you the most/least.
I like chains 1 and 2 (2 slightly more than 1)...
--
dan
http://hometown.aol.com/goofygrafx
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I just wanted to express my opinion after seeing that #2 has so far been the
majority favorite. Like I said at the pre-beta group, that design is placed
onto a dogtag shape which seems too common to me. Hopefully there will be
more to judge from soon.
Chris's design might seem too large, but I doubt IRL it would be. Anything
2 inches, or about 5 cm, in the long dimension should be ergonomic enough.
Maybe 3.5 cm round if circular in shape. And I'd like more to be there than
just the logo symbol. Fabien Mosen's design is too minimalist IMHO, were it
not for the script backdrop. Not that I have say alone but what we need is
lots of opinions, suggestions, designs to ferret out the right one for
general POVers. Then at least we know we wouldn't be missing a great idea.
Bob H.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
