Ron Parker wrote:
> 
> 
> Yes, you either hear plans for improvements or it's your hope for
> accelerating those endless isosurface renders.  Or both.
> 

Thanks for that unambiguous answer. ;-)

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other 
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message

In article <3a673c74$1@news.povray.org>, "Thorsten Froehlich" 
<tho### [at] trfde> wrote:

> Isosurfaces in MegaPOV are very slow.  There are ways to calculate 
> them with the same/better precision but more than ten times faster...

Are you talking about tesselating them first, and rendering the mesh? 
(As is done with modellers...)
Or something else? A specific flaw in the algorithm used in the 
isosurface patch?

-- 
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/

<><

Post a reply to this message

In article <chrishuff-A11C99.21084719012001@news.povray.org> , Chris Huff 
<chr### [at] maccom>  wrote:

> Are you talking about tesselating them first, and rendering the mesh?
> (As is done with modellers...)
> Or something else? A specific flaw in the algorithm used in the
> isosurface patch?

Lets wait a few weeks with this :-)


    Thorsten

Post a reply to this message