 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trf de> wrote in message
news:37a59b4b@news.povray.org...
> In article <37a5632b@news.povray.org> , "Twyst" <twy### [at] twystednet> wrote:
>
> >> CyberDog isn't... it chokes on:
> >> nested tables
> >> javascript (simply ignores it)
> >> some plug-ins
> >
> >
> > Well, since I do a LOT of my layout with nested tables, there's not much
I
> > can do.
> > Plugins: well, I've already decided that I don't want to use any (flash
was
> > an idea... but that's been vetoed.) I've never heard of this browser...
Is
> > it anything like Opera?
>
> It is a browser developed by Apple years ago and officially discontinued
for
> at least two years. It won't run on future Macs anyway.
>
ah. ok. that means I don't have to worry about it. =D
Anyways.. I have a quick preview of the site look up at
http://24.108.7.134/work.htm
Give me some feedback on it, please.
>
> Thorsten
>
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
> e-mail: tho### [at] trfde
>
> Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 31 Jul 1999 22:47:34 -0600, Twyst wrote:
>Well, as the overwhelming response is 'No Flash', I won't be using it.
>
>Here's a new question: What browsers are people running?
Netscape 4.5, IE 4 or 5 depending on which machine I'm using, and
whatever version of Lynx came with OpenLinux 2.2. In short,
nothing 100% HTML 4.0 compatible. (But then again, what browser
is?)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Twyst wrote:
> Anyways.. I have a quick preview of the site look up at
> http://24.108.7.134/work.htm
>
> Give me some feedback on it, please.
It loads quickly on my modem connection, looks professional but not glitzy,
and the navigation bar looks efficient and not over done. I would say you
are definitely on the right track with your current implementation.
--
Ken Tyler
mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/links.htm
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Twyst wrote:
>
> Anyways.. I have a quick preview of the site look up at
> http://24.108.7.134/work.htm
>
> Give me some feedback on it, please.
>
Loads quickly (even though I have a 14.4 connection right now). Looks neat and
tasteful. Structure seems clear, logical. I like it.
Margus
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Twyst wrote:
> .........................
>
> Anyways.. I have a quick preview of the site look up at
> http://24.108.7.134/work.htm
>
> Give me some feedback on it, please.
>
> >................
Looks quite promising already; I'm impatiently waiting.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Twyst wrote:
> .........................
>
> Anyways.. I have a quick preview of the site look up at
> http://24.108.7.134/work.htm
>
> Give me some feedback on it, please.
>
> >................
Looks quite promising already; I'm impatiently waiting.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Twyst wrote:
> .........................
>
> Anyways.. I have a quick preview of the site look up at
> http://24.108.7.134/work.htm
>
> Give me some feedback on it, please.
>
> >................
Looks quite promising already; I'm impatiently waiting.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Twyst <twy### [at] twystednet> wrote
>
> Anyways.. I have a quick preview of the site look up at
> http://24.108.7.134/work.htm
>
> Give me some feedback on it, please.
>
Looks good on IE 5.0!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi,
Watched it with netscape 4.08 on Solaris 7.
Did not test on XTerminal yet, I got used too much to the workstation.
Everything is clearly readable. It displays as fast as possible,
(I had a bit of a hang, though we are 10MBit connected, to much joy for
your server??)
... due to the absolut sizes in the table. (THANX).Even reading the
source is ok, but that's probably not your main intention :-)
Didn't look too good in Lynx Version 2.7, though. 2.8.2 on Linux did it
alright.
RIGHT WAY TO GO.
Axel
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Twyst wrote:
> Anyways.. I have a quick preview of the site look up at
> http://24.108.7.134/work.htm
>
> Give me some feedback on it, please.
Well, it looks almost nice on my system. Good text, legible, except...
It scrolls off the screen to the right. My screen is 1280x1024, 32bit, but I
don't use my browser full-screen. I keep it to windows that are portrait, not
landscape, and who's size and dimensions approximate an 8 1/2 x 11" sheet of
paper.
It scales wider well. If you could get it to have a smaller minimum width, then
it would be much more functional. I like the way that http://www.linux.com/
functions.
Oh no. I just did a screen-grab to check, and guess what size I have my window
set to? 648x942. Guess that 640 width might not be such a bad idea after all,
as it makes longer text far more readable, etc. (Take a peek at any magazine or
newspaper to see that tall and narrow is much more readable)
--
"My new computer's got the clocks, it rocks
But it was obsolete before I opened the box" - W.A.Y.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
