 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In povray.announce.frequently-asked-questions Alan Kong mentions a
certain POV-Ray 3.1d. It's not on the site so it's not public yet, but
any ideas about it? I haven't heard anything about it in the groups
but then again, I no longer read all messages. Can anybody enlighted
me?
Peter
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Peter Popov wrote:
>
> In povray.announce.frequently-asked-questions Alan Kong mentions a
> certain POV-Ray 3.1d. It's not on the site so it's not public yet, but
> any ideas about it? I haven't heard anything about it in the groups
> but then again, I no longer read all messages. Can anybody enlighted
> me?
>
> Peter
If you look at the announcement closely you sill see that is is
a bug fix version of v3.1. The list of corrected bugs is listed
and what effect they were having. I presume that once the users
at compuserve get through beta testing it it will be distributed
publicaly through usenet. Shouldn't be too long from now.
--
Ken Tyler
tyl### [at] pacbell net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <36b9e2ab.2183172@news.povray.org> , pet### [at] usanet (Peter
Popov) wrote:
> In povray.announce.frequently-asked-questions Alan Kong mentions a
> certain POV-Ray 3.1d. It's not on the site so it's not public yet, but
> any ideas about it? I haven't heard anything about it in the groups
> but then again, I no longer read all messages. Can anybody enlighted
> me?
Oh, it is public, the DOS version as well as the source code is available in
the CompuServe POVRAY forum. The other platform versions are not avilable
yet. I suspect that Chris will update www.povray.org when the other platform
versions are available.
And if you go back a few day, it has been mentioned in this newsgroup, look
into the " Information about future povray versions..." thread.
Thorsten
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
>
> If you look at the announcement closely you sill see that is is
> a bug fix version of v3.1.
This is putting it lightly!
The team is to be thanked and congratulated on such a comprehensive
fix...
Dan
P.S. I still find very compelling some of the features in some of the
3.1 patches ( Parker's SuperPatch and Kopp's "Patched POV"
(http://nathan.kopp.com/patched.htm)),
but the list of bug fixes in 3.1d is of major significance!
--
http://www.flash.net/~djconnel/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 02 Feb 1999 19:22:52 -0600, Dan Connelly <djc### [at] flashnet>
wrote:
>> If you look at the announcement closely you sill see that is is
>> a bug fix version of v3.1.
>
>This is putting it lightly!
>
>The team is to be thanked and congratulated on such a comprehensive
>fix...
>
>Dan
>
>P.S. I still find very compelling some of the features in some of the
>3.1 patches ( Parker's SuperPatch and Kopp's "Patched POV"
>(http://nathan.kopp.com/patched.htm)),
>but the list of bug fixes in 3.1d is of major significance!
You may rest assured that as soon as I get my grubby hands on a copy
of the source code that I'm allowed to redistribute, I'll be merging
it in. :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
