POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : Union vs. Merge ? Server Time
15 Nov 2024 13:22:11 EST (-0500)
  Union vs. Merge ? (Message 1 to 7 of 7)  
From: Kyle
Subject: Union vs. Merge ?
Date: 27 Jan 1999 16:35:47
Message: <36AF86B7.53425708@geocities.com>
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" link="#0000EE" vlink="#551A8B" alink="#FF0000">
Hi,  I'm curious,  is there a rendering time differnce between
two objects that are unioned and two objects that are merged?  And
while on the topic, what's the difference between them?  They both
seem to do the exact same thing to me.  Thanks.
<br>                   
Kyle
<br> 
</body>
</html>


Post a reply to this message

From: Spider
Subject: Re: Union vs. Merge ?
Date: 27 Jan 1999 16:47:17
Message: <36AF8856.95298C1A@bahnhof.se>
Now, loookie loookie !!!
http://www.students.tut.fi/~warp/povVFAQ.html

There, read and enjoy...

Or, to quote Douglas Adams : "Share and enjoy!"
//Spider

Kyle wrote:
> 






Post a reply to this message

From: Ron Parker
Subject: Re: Union vs. Merge ?
Date: 27 Jan 1999 16:49:47
Message: <36af89fb.0@news.povray.org>
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" 
link="#0000EE" vlink="#551A8B" alink="#FF0000">
<blink>
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:35:52 -0500, Kyle <joe### [at] geocitiescom>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote>
Hi,  I'm curious,  is there a rendering time differnce between
two objects that are unioned and two objects that are merged?  And
while on the topic, what's the difference between them?  They both
seem to do the exact same thing to me.  Thanks.
<br>
</blockquote>
<p>
You might want to check out the POV VFAQ at 
http://iki.fi/warp/povVFAQ.html#csgspeed
<p>
You might also want to check out the fine manual.  If that
doesn't make sense to you, try rendering some semitransparent 
objects with union and merge and see if you can see the difference.
<p>
PS: Notice how <font size="+5" color="#ff0000">ANNOYING</font> HTML 
posts are?
</blink>
</body>
</html>


Post a reply to this message

From: Spider
Subject: Re: Union vs. Merge ?
Date: 27 Jan 1999 17:04:41
Message: <36AF8C6A.AF4F1F13@bahnhof.se>
This was fun....
Very so. I really thought the message blank until I viewed it in my reply...
(text-only
messages...)

//Spider

Ron Parker wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:35:52 -0500, Kyle <joe### [at] geocitiescom> wrote:
> 




> 
> You might want to check out the POV VFAQ at http://iki.fi/warp/povVFAQ.html#csgspeed
> 
> You might also want to check out the fine manual. If that doesn't make sense to you,
try
> rendering some semitransparent objects with union and merge and see if you can see
the
> difference.
> 
> PS: Notice how ANNOYING HTML posts are?


Post a reply to this message

From: Marc Schimmler
Subject: Re: Union vs. Merge ?
Date: 28 Jan 1999 02:44:10
Message: <36B0154A.837468DA@ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
Ron Parker wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:35:52 -0500, Kyle <joe### [at] geocitiescom>
> wrote:
> 
>      Hi,  I'm curious,  is there a rendering time differnce
>      between two objects that are unioned and two objects that
>      are merged?  And while on the topic, what's the difference
>      between them?  They both seem to do the exact same thing to
>      me.  Thanks.
> 
> You might want to check out the POV VFAQ at
> http://iki.fi/warp/povVFAQ.html#csgspeed
> 
> You might also want to check out the fine manual. If that doesn't make
> sense to you, try rendering some semitransparent objects with union
> and merge and see if you can see the difference.
> 
> PS: Notice how ANNOYING HTML posts are?

A proper answer!! ;-)

Kyle, you have been asked before to send your messages in plain text
*NOT* html. There are several newsreaders out there that show a lot of
rubbish when they read your posts (have a look at the source of Ron's
reply)!! 

I just saw that you use Netscape 4.5 on Win95. OK!

EDIT>PREFERENCES>MAIL&GROUPS>MESSAGES>MORE OPTIONS>ALWAYS CONVERT
MESSAGES INTO PLAIN TEXT

I hope this helps,

Marc
-- 
Marc Schimmler


Post a reply to this message

From: Lue Ebra
Subject: Re: Union vs. Merge ?
Date: 29 Jan 1999 01:51:20
Message: <36b15a68.0@news.povray.org>
I paid it no mind until I saw the red and the over-emphasized "ANNOYING"...
I didn't even notice any difference in download time  (it's only 2K)
but, then again, I'm running a fairly bulky news/email reader that doesn't
balk at much... add to that an unlimited account at 26,400 actual connect
speed on a 33.6 modem through close to 80 MILES of phone line..

Lue Ebra
lue### [at] nxuscom
www.electro-net.com/~lueebra
"The only constant in the universe is change"

    Ron Parker wrote in message <36af89fb.0@news.povray.org>...
    On Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:35:52 -0500, Kyle <joe### [at] geocitiescom> wrote:

        Hi,  I'm curious,  is there a rendering time differnce between two
objects that are unioned and two objects that are merged?  And while on the
topic, what's the difference between them?  They both seem to do the exact
same thing to me.  Thanks.

    You might want to check out the POV VFAQ at
http://iki.fi/warp/povVFAQ.html#csgspeed

    You might also want to check out the fine manual. If that doesn't make
sense to you, try rendering some semitransparent objects with union and
merge and see if you can see the difference.

    PS: Notice how ANNOYING HTML posts are?


Post a reply to this message

From: Ron Parker
Subject: Re: Union vs. Merge ?
Date: 29 Jan 1999 08:22:17
Message: <36b1b609.0@news.povray.org>
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999 01:49:56 -0500, Lue Ebra <lue### [at] nxuscom> wrote:
>I paid it no mind until I saw the red and the over-emphasized "ANNOYING"...

That's cuz you're using Outlook Express.  Those using Netscape (as is
the person to whom I was replying  have the horror of the <blink> tag to 
deal with as well.

>I didn't even notice any difference in download time  (it's only 2K)

But the issue isn't download time.  It's that the article doesn't display
correctly on a real newsreader (that is, one that isn't really a web 
browser in disguise.)  Some of us know HTML and are sometimes willing to
wade through all the tags and   entities and crud to get to the 
meat of the message, but it's often not worth it.  For a while, in fact,
I had my newsreader configured to kill on the Content-Type: header, thus
effectively ignoring all HTML posts.  This turned out to be too costly,
though, as that header is not included in the overview information so 
SLRN has to download full headers for every new article on startup.


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.