In article <36646603.31F68562@pacbell.net>, Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote:

>Jerry wrote:
>> If what you are talking about is like "beveled" text, go to dejanews and
>> look for bevel in the POV-Ray newsgroup. There are at least two examples
>> there, one for POV 3.0 and one for POV 3.1.
>
>  There better not be any reference to a pov-ray newsgroup
>at dejanews. This is a closed server and does not appear
>on usenet. If it does someone should report it to the povray
>admin team immediatly. Perhaps you mean c.g.r.r. or one of
>the other subject groups on this server ?

I meant comp.graphics.rendering.raytracing. Which is not a POV-Ray
newsgroup (although POV-Ray is on topic within it) and I have no idea why
I used that phrase.

Jerry

Post a reply to this message

Ken is getting sloppy in his high output volume.

Of course there are references to news.povray.org in dejanews.  A quick check will
reveal
that.  They were archived during the leak, which was acknowleged and fixed
by the administrators.  But it will take years for that section of the archive to
be purged.

Dan


Jerry wrote:
> 
> In article <36646603.31F68562@pacbell.net>, Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote:
> 
> >Jerry wrote:
> >> If what you are talking about is like "beveled" text, go to dejanews and
> >> look for bevel in the POV-Ray newsgroup. There are at least two examples
> >> there, one for POV 3.0 and one for POV 3.1.
> >
> >  There better not be any reference to a pov-ray newsgroup
> >at dejanews. This is a closed server and does not appear
> >on usenet. If it does someone should report it to the povray
> >admin team immediatly. Perhaps you mean c.g.r.r. or one of
> >the other subject groups on this server ?
> 
> I meant comp.graphics.rendering.raytracing. Which is not a POV-Ray
> newsgroup (although POV-Ray is on topic within it) and I have no idea why
> I used that phrase.
> 
> Jerry

-- 
http://www.flash.net/~djconnel/

Post a reply to this message

Dan Connelly wrote:
> 
> Ken is getting sloppy in his high output volume.

Say WHAT ? I thought it was a fair and reasonable warning and
also appended the statement saying I thought Jerry had simply
made a mistake in his reference to the newgroup in question.
It appears I have been vendicated since that is indeed what
heppened.
 
> Of course there are references to news.povray.org in dejanews.  A quick check will
reveal
> that.  They were archived during the leak, which was acknowleged and fixed
> by the administrators.  But it will take years for that section of the archive to
> be purged.
> 
> Dan

It is because of that snafu that I took the defensive on the
Pov teams behalf.

Getting sloppy my rendered tush !

-- 
Ken Tyler

tyl### [at] pacbellnet

Post a reply to this message

Ken wrote:
> 
> It is because of that snafu that I took the defensive on the
> Pov teams behalf.
> 
> Getting sloppy my rendered tush !

Ahh -- you said there should be "no reference" to povray newsgroups....
I did a quick search for text references as follows :

http://www.dejanews.com/dnquery.xp?ST=PS&QRY=text&defaultOp=AND&DBS=1&format=terse&showsort=score&maxhits=25&LNG=ALL&subjects=&groups=povray.*&authors=&fromdate=&todate=

... plenty of matches.  It is true there should be no references to recent articles,
but
I still maintain your statement was a bit hasty.

Granted -- you were correct that the original recommendation was a typo.  I'm just
being picky because I have too much to do at work and need to get out my frustrations
:).

Dan
-- 
http://www.flash.net/~djconnel/

Post a reply to this message

Dan Connelly wrote:
> I still maintain your statement was a bit hasty.

I remember clearly that I typed it slowly.
 
> Granted -- you were correct that the original recommendation was a typo.  I'm just
> being picky because I have too much to do at work and need to get out my
frustrations 

Just keep saying to yourself "I am not a machine ! I am not a machine !".
-- 
Ken Tyler

tyl### [at] pacbellnet

Post a reply to this message