 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Mark Arrasmith" <arr### [at] worldnet attnet> wrote:
>What is the name of the edit control you are using?
CodeMax. See www.winmain.com.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi,
>The changes to POVWIN itself are extensive and will be listed in this
>newsgroup to allow users to decide whether or not to download it.
it sounds great!! Especially the new material{} statement seems to be
fantastic :-D
I didn't download the new beta by now, but I hope the bug with
GUI-Extensions has been fixed too, because it hasn't been mentioned in
the changes summary... ??
Bye,
Friedemann
Friedemann Schmidt
Fri### [at] Stonescom
Raytracing-Gallery: http://www.rz.fhtw-berlin.de/~s0049669/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>I didn't download the new beta by now, but I hope the bug with
>GUI-Extensions has been fixed too, because it hasn't been mentioned in
>the changes summary... ??
yeah, it's fixed.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The beta 6 release has been delayed for a few days to fix a last-minute parser
bug.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
povray.org admin team heeft geschreven in bericht
<35dfc6fb.18476197@news.povray.org>...
> o Added rubberband mode to render window for selection of render
region.
Great! I hope the re-rendered region is shown in the original rendering to
see the differences.
BTW:
I downloaded beta 5 only yesterday so there will be another 5.5 meg to pull,
I am afraid :-(.
Is there any schedule in the betas?
Frans.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Great! I hope the re-rendered region is shown in the original rendering to
>see the differences.
Nope, it's not. That would have involved too many changes. If someone wants
that feature it would be almost trivial to implement as a GUI extension.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>CodeMax. See www.winmain.com.
They don't support AlphaNT though they did say . . .
<snip>
Alpha NT is not supported, but you could quite easily port the code, making
only minor big/little-endian and structure-alignment changes to the source.
</snip>
Hmm, $400 is alot to just try and port it to Alpha. Anyone besides me
really want to try? Or am I going to have alot of explaining to my wife?
:)
- mark
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
povray.org admin team wrote in<35e12f16.110664006@news.povray.org>...
>If someone wants that feature it would be almost trivial to implement as a
GUI extension.
Sorry, I do not understand that part of your answer. English is not my first
language, but according to my dictionary 'trivial' means either 'not
important', 'commonplace', or 'lacking seriousness'. What I meant is that it
would be a useful feature when, for example, fine tuning light strength,
bump values, etc. Admittedly, one could load the original picture in say
photoshop, copy the rendered patch into it, and move the patch around till
it fits, and one could see the effect of the changes made, provided you have
no trouble with POV opening a file being used by photoshop, etc. In my
opinion, the feature would allow the user to speed up the tuning process,
and therefore in that respect it is both important and serious, and
certainly not commonplace.
The feature would nescessarily be provided by the GUI, which has shown the
picture the user is not satisfied with, which has allowed the user to make
the changes, and which has allowed the user to indicate the area on which he
wants a test for his new settings. In view of the above, it is not beyond
the scope of the GUI to allow the user a good comparison.
povray.org admin team also wrote in<35e12f16.110664006@news.povray.org>...
>That would have involved too many changes.
Ok, that's a VERY good reason for not implementing it. I do not know the POV
code, but I take it is complex. I just creep on with a bitmap editor and
renamed files.
Thank you for the work you do!
Frans
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>language, but according to my dictionary 'trivial' means either 'not
>important', 'commonplace', or 'lacking seriousness'. What I meant is that
'Trivial' can also mean 'not difficult', or 'simple'.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 25 Aug 1998 13:01:04 GMT, new### [at] DESPAMpovrayorg
(povray.org admin team) wrote:
>>language, but according to my dictionary 'trivial' means either 'not
>>important', 'commonplace', or 'lacking seriousness'. What I meant is that
>
>'Trivial' can also mean 'not difficult', or 'simple'.
Being used as a common abbreviation for "Such a feature would need
only a trivial amount of effort".
Cheers,
Cliff Bowman
Why not pay my 3D Dr Who site a visit at
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Dimension/7855/
PS change ".duffnet" to ".net" if replying via e-mail
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
