 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
TigerHawk wrote:
>
> Well, I tried to compile it and got this (see bottom).
> (it's been cut, but it repeats alot, so I think you get the general idea)
> I just don't quite know what's wrong. I tried it with gcc-2.7.2.1 and egcs.
> In any case, if you could send me your compiled binary, I would apreciate it!
>
> Thanks for the help!
>
> Tim Soderstrom
> TigerHawk
>
> (Output snippet)
> LPARSER.C:246: stray '\' in program
> LPARSER.C:247: syntax error before `*='
> LPARSER.C:247: stray '\' in program
> LPARSER.C:248: syntax error before `*='
> LPARSER.C:248: stray '\' in program
> LPARSER.C: In function `void Set_ECS(float *)':
> LPARSER.C:1459: stray '\' in program
> LPARSER.C:1462: stray '\' in program
> LPARSER.C:1463: parse error before `else'
> LPARSER.C:1464: stray '\' in program
> LPARSER.C:1467: stray '\' in program
> LPARSER.C:1468: stray '\' in program
> LPARSER.C:1469: stray '\' in program
> LPARSER.C:1475: cannot declare static function inside another function
> LPARSER.C:1475: parse error before `{'
> LPARSER.C:1477: `p2' undeclared (first use this function)
> LPARSER.C:1477: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> LPARSER.C:1477: for each function it appears in.)
> LPARSER.C:1477: `p1' undeclared (first use this function)
> LPARSER.C:1477: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
Have you removed the additional CRs (?) at the end of the lines? The
source has been written under M$. I remember GCC having problems with
that not giving clear messages. I'll have a look and send you the
binaries anyway.
All the Best,
Marc
--
Marc Schimmler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
TigerHawk wrote:
>
> Well, I tried to compile it and got this (see bottom).
> (it's been cut, but it repeats alot, so I think you get the general idea)
> I just don't quite know what's wrong. I tried it with gcc-2.7.2.1 and egcs.
> In any case, if you could send me your compiled binary, I would apreciate it!
>
> Thanks for the help!
>
> Tim Soderstrom
> TigerHawk
>
Couldn't get through to your email! My server reports a failure at your
side :-(
Please contact me!
Marc
--
Marc Schimmler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Eh? Really? It should be Tig### [at] Stic Net (maybe w/o caps, but I doubt it's case
sensetive anyway. UHmm...hmm..that's odd...I didn't know i had to modify the
source though, I guess I can try that. YOu might want to try it again though, it
was up when I checked my mail - most people sending get to it no problem....
No worries,
Tim Soderstrom
TigerHawk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
TigerHawk wrote:
>
> Eh? Really? It should be Tig### [at] SticNet (maybe w/o caps, but I doubt it's case
> sensetive anyway. UHmm...hmm..that's odd...I didn't know i had to modify the
> source though, I guess I can try that. YOu might want to try it again though, it
> was up when I checked my mail - most people sending get to it no problem....
>
> No worries,
> Tim Soderstrom
> TigerHawk
I tried it this time with the caps but it says:
**********************************************************
The original message was received at Tue, 6 Jul 1999 03:09:15 -0400
from roo### [at] charybdisrusuni-stuttgartde [129.69.1.58]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<Tig### [at] SitcNet>
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 MX list for sitc.net. points back to wolverine.emji.net
Reporting-MTA: dns; wolverine.emji.net
Received-From-MTA: DNS; charybdis.rus.uni-stuttgart.de
Arrival-Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 03:09:15 -0400
Final-Recipient: RFC822; Tig### [at] SitcNet
Action: failed
Status: 5.5.0
Remote-MTA: DNS; sitc.net
Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 03:11:24 -0400
***************************************************************
Sorry!
Marc
--
Marc Schimmler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 06 Jul 1999 09:17:01 +0200, Marc Schimmler
<sch### [at] icauni-stuttgartde> wrote:
> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
><Tig### [at] SitcNet>
Hi, Marc. Look again at Tim Soderstrom's previous post (different in the
"From" line and the body of his message), paying special attention to the
spelling of the domain. He spells it "s t i c", but you have it as "s i t
c". What happens if you try it with the revised spelling?
--
Alan
--------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.povray.org - Home of the Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer
news.povray.org - where POV-Ray enthusiasts around the world can get
together to exchange ideas, information, and experiences with others
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Alan Kong wrote:
>
> On Tue, 06 Jul 1999 09:17:01 +0200, Marc Schimmler
> <sch### [at] icauni-stuttgartde> wrote:
>
> > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> ><Tig### [at] SitcNet>
>
> Hi, Marc. Look again at Tim Soderstrom's previous post (different in the
> "From" line and the body of his message), paying special attention to the
> spelling of the domain. He spells it "s t i c", but you have it as "s i t
> c". What happens if you try it with the revised spelling?
>
> --
> Alan
Hi Alan!
Your are right! Lazy me tried to use reply to sender with the email
address given in the header! This one is spelled wrong!
I changed it and it worked (at least I did not get an error). Thank you
very much and Tim ... please correct your email address in your browser!
Thanks,
Marc
--
Marc Schimmler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
My e-mail addresss is wrong? tig### [at] sticnet is what it should be for a mail
reply....
Tim Soderstrom
TigerHawk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
TigerHawk wrote:
>
> My e-mail addresss is wrong? tig### [at] sticnet is what it should be for a mail
> reply....
>
> Tim Soderstrom
> TigerHawk
I use netscape like you do. If you have a look at you preferences menu
under identity you will see that the e-mail address there has been typed
as
tig### [at] sitcnet
^^^^
and not as
tig### [at] sticnet
^^^^
You see the problem? Everybody like me trying to mail you with the
address given in the header of the message must fail. If you correct
this everything should be fine.
All the Best,
Marc
--
Marc Schimmler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 04 Aug 1999 13:59:55 +0200, Marc Schimmler
<sch### [at] icauni-stuttgartde> wrote:
>I use netscape like you do. If you have a look at you preferences menu
>under identity you will see that the e-mail address there has been typed
>as
>
>tig### [at] sitcnet
> ^^^^
>
>and not as
>
>tig### [at] sticnet
> ^^^^
>
>You see the problem? Everybody like me trying to mail you with the
>address given in the header of the message must fail. If you correct
>this everything should be fine.
>
Hmm. Tim must not have seen your post, Marc. He posted in this group on
13-Aug-1999 but his header still reads tig### [at] sitcnet.
--
Alan
--------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.povray.org - Home of the Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer
news.povray.org - where POV-Ray enthusiasts around the world can get
together to exchange ideas, information, and experiences with others
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Alan Kong wrote:
>
> Hmm. Tim must not have seen your post, Marc. He posted in this group on
> 13-Aug-1999 but his header still reads tig### [at] sitcnet.
>
Maybe I'm in his killfile :-)
I mail him.
Marc
--
Marc Schimmler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
