TigerHawk wrote:
> 
> Eh? Really? It should be Tig### [at] SticNet (maybe w/o caps, but I doubt it's case
> sensetive anyway. UHmm...hmm..that's odd...I didn't know i had to modify the
> source though, I guess I can try that. YOu might want to try it again though, it
> was up when I checked my mail - most people sending get to it no problem....
> 
> No worries,
> Tim Soderstrom
> TigerHawk

I tried it this time with the caps but it says:

**********************************************************

The original message was received at Tue, 6 Jul 1999 03:09:15 -0400
from roo### [at] charybdisrusuni-stuttgartde [129.69.1.58]

   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<Tig### [at] SitcNet>

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 MX list for sitc.net. points back to wolverine.emji.net

Reporting-MTA: dns; wolverine.emji.net
Received-From-MTA: DNS; charybdis.rus.uni-stuttgart.de
Arrival-Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 03:09:15 -0400

Final-Recipient: RFC822; Tig### [at] SitcNet
Action: failed
Status: 5.5.0
Remote-MTA: DNS; sitc.net
Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 03:11:24 -0400

***************************************************************

Sorry!

Marc
-- 
Marc Schimmler

Post a reply to this message