|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/p/BPiHgc1gR1Z/
Thanks!
Dan
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: dick balaska
Subject: Re: Eye Candy #1 (screenshot to latest animated film)
Date: 22 Jan 2017 01:05:30
Message: <58844baa$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 2017-01-21 11:16, also sprach Dan Byers:
> https://youtu.be/l3f8MkCOFLU
Nice!
The first time I watched it, I really liked the background movement.
The second time I watched it, focusing on the structure of the primary
models, I found that background distracting.
So the third time I watched it, I had trained my eye to ignore the
background and focus on the magic donuts. :)
--
dik
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
dick balaska <dic### [at] buckosoftcom> wrote:
> Am 2017-01-21 11:16, also sprach Dan Byers:
> > https://youtu.be/l3f8MkCOFLU
>
> Nice!
> The first time I watched it, I really liked the background movement.
> The second time I watched it, focusing on the structure of the primary
> models, I found that background distracting.
> So the third time I watched it, I had trained my eye to ignore the
> background and focus on the magic donuts. :)
> --
> dik
Thanks! :D Yeah, the background is a bit busy, but that's why I recommend
watching it on Instagram, or if YouTube will let you, set it to loop. It sucks
you in after awhile ;)
Dan
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The animation is pretty trippy. The still image just doesn't do it any justice.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Very nice!
Regards,
Dave Blandston
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"jhu" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> The animation is pretty trippy. The still image just doesn't do it any justice.
Thank you! :)
Dan
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Dave Blandston" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> Very nice!
>
> Regards,
> Dave Blandston
Thanks! :)
Dan
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Eye Candy #1 (screenshot to latest animated film)
Date: 29 Jan 2017 16:59:08
Message: <588e65ac$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 1/21/2017 4:16 PM, Dan Byers wrote:
> Hello! After many, many days of rendering, "Eye Candy #1" is ready for your
> viewing pleasure.
>
> YouTube:
> https://youtu.be/l3f8MkCOFLU
>
I particularly liked the wall tile flipping.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> On 1/21/2017 4:16 PM, Dan Byers wrote:
> > Hello! After many, many days of rendering, "Eye Candy #1" is ready for your
> > viewing pleasure.
> >
> > YouTube:
> > https://youtu.be/l3f8MkCOFLU
> >
>
>
> I particularly liked the wall tile flipping.
>
>
> --
>
> Regards
> Stephen
Thanks! :) Took some coordination to get each flip to be different -- there are
six flips through the 25-second span -- and end up on the original flip when the
video loops. I also wanted the cascade to flow from left to right as well as
from bottom to top, but that got weird, especially when trying to wrap the
cascade from one wall to the next.
Dan
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Eye Candy #1 (screenshot to latest animated film)
Date: 30 Jan 2017 06:14:04
Message: <588f1ffc$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 1/29/2017 11:42 PM, Dan Byers wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>> On 1/21/2017 4:16 PM, Dan Byers wrote:
>>> Hello! After many, many days of rendering, "Eye Candy #1" is ready for your
>>> viewing pleasure.
>>>
>>> YouTube:
>>> https://youtu.be/l3f8MkCOFLU
>>>
>>
>>
>> I particularly liked the wall tile flipping.
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Regards
>> Stephen
>
> Thanks! :) Took some coordination to get each flip to be different -- there are
> six flips through the 25-second span -- and end up on the original flip when the
> video loops.
That is what I thought was good. The sparkle's are good but the cyclic
aspect is impressive.
> I also wanted the cascade to flow from left to right as well as
> from bottom to top, but that got weird, especially when trying to wrap the
> cascade from one wall to the next.
>
Experiments with only the wall might be interesting to see.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |