I'm so dumb to forget the 1 MB limit for publishing an included image - but
otherwise there won't be a discussion - so here again - please forgive...

Norbert

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'hof candidates imho.jpg' (703 KB)

Preview of image 'hof candidates imho.jpg'

"Norbert Kern" <nor### [at] t-onlinede> wrote:
> I'm so dumb to forget the 1 MB limit for publishing an included image - but
> otherwise there won't be a discussion - so here again - please forgive...
>
> Norbert

Meh, those are good, but clearly not HOF worthy because all the excellet images
were made before 2009.

Post a reply to this message

"jhu" <nomail@nomail> wrote:

you are (more than) right - that's exactly my point...

If truth is a distinct value here (what I think is more than a save assumption),
then these images should be recognized as valid candidates despite of their
publication date.


Norbert

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'hof candidates imho_.jpg' (460 KB)

Preview of image 'hof candidates imho_.jpg'

"Norbert Kern" <nor### [at] t-onlinede> wrote:
> I'm so dumb to forget the 1 MB limit for publishing an included image - but
> otherwise there won't be a discussion - so here again - please forgive...
>
> Norbert

Great images, I have seen all but the top and middle left (which are both
incredible images), certainly they would be candidates.

My favourite of these though is the water creature as it is before the SSLT
feature as well it is even more impressive.

I think a very large hall of fame may be required or maybe several categorized
ones.

Sean

Post a reply to this message

On 12/09/2014 01:21 AM, s.day wrote:
> William F Pokorny <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
>>
>> Bravo!
>>
>> Bill P.
>
> Thanks Bill,
>
> I did not get many of the suggestions I was given into the scene (would like to
> have added a few more but time/memory were against me). However, if you look
> carefully there are a few dandelion seeds flying by as was one of your
> suggestions. There are actually 5 which I could see fine without the grass
> switched on, when I ran the final render they largely disappeared into the
> background. I can only see 1 clearly (as it was the closest to the camera which
> makes it look too big to be realistic) and as I know roughly where they are I
> can spot 3 of the others but the fourth even I cannot find.
>
> Consider it a where's wally kind of challenge ;-)
>
> Sean
>

I did see the one flying seed clearly & thought perhaps I picked up 
another - which turned out to be pretty close as shown in your secondary 
render, so I'll give myself credit for seeing 1.5 of the 5. ;-)

Bill P.

Post a reply to this message

On 12/08/2014 04:09 PM, s.day wrote:
> This is the final version of this image, I feel like I could go on adding
> details to this scene for a while longer but I am getting near the memory limit
> on my PC and the tc-rtc deadline is nearly here..

Congratulations on winning this round!

Post a reply to this message

On 01/01/2015 18:13, Cousin Ricky wrote:
> On 12/08/2014 04:09 PM, s.day wrote:
>> This is the final version of this image, I feel like I could go on adding
>> details to this scene for a while longer but I am getting near the
>> memory limit
>> on my PC and the tc-rtc deadline is nearly here..
>
> Congratulations on winning this round!
>
>

Yes, congratulations. And well done to all who entered. It was a hard 
round to vote on. All of the entries were good.

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Cousin Ricky <ric### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> On 12/08/2014 04:09 PM, s.day wrote:
> > This is the final version of this image, I feel like I could go on adding
> > details to this scene for a while longer but I am getting near the memory limit
> > on my PC and the tc-rtc deadline is nearly here..
>
> Congratulations on winning this round!

Thanks, it was a good round with some great images (which makes it feel even
better to have won!).

Hope the next round is as good, at the moment I have not had any great ideas but
that's the good thing about the 4 month timescale.

Sean

Post a reply to this message

Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> On 01/01/2015 18:13, Cousin Ricky wrote:
> > On 12/08/2014 04:09 PM, s.day wrote:
> >> This is the final version of this image, I feel like I could go on adding
> >> details to this scene for a while longer but I am getting near the
> >> memory limit
> >> on my PC and the tc-rtc deadline is nearly here..
> >
> > Congratulations on winning this round!
> >
> >
>
> Yes, congratulations. And well done to all who entered. It was a hard
> round to vote on. All of the entries were good.
>
> --
>
> Regards
>      Stephen

Thanks, I always find voting and adding useful comments the hard part. I
normally have a clear favourite (usually Robert's, but in this round it was the
kitchen scene by Jhu which was fantastic) after my obvious favourite it gets a
lot tougher to rank them as many had different aspects I liked.

Looking forward to the new site and secondary contests.

Sean

Post a reply to this message

"s.day" <s.d### [at] uelacuk> wrote:

> Thanks, I always find voting and adding useful comments the hard part. I
> normally have a clear favourite (usually Robert's, but in this round it was the
> kitchen scene by Jhu which was fantastic) after my obvious favourite it gets a
> lot tougher to rank them as many had different aspects I liked.
>
> Looking forward to the new site and secondary contests.
>
> Sean

From the winner. I'm honored.

Post a reply to this message