POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Rendering issues Server Time
15 Nov 2024 18:21:18 EST (-0500)
  Rendering issues (Message 1 to 10 of 14)  
Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 4 Messages >>>
From: jhu
Subject: Rendering issues
Date: 12 Jan 2008 16:00:01
Message: <web.478929dc8a37fce37bcf5ca50@news.povray.org>
I'm trying to make a room with stucco by subtracting out isosurfaces. As you can
see in this test render, in the room where the camera is located the stucco
renderes as it should. However, the arrows pointing toward the archway show an
area that is subtracted out but is rendering in all black. Anyone encounter
this before with a solution?


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'error.jpg' (20 KB)

Preview of image 'error.jpg'
error.jpg


 

From: stbenge
Subject: Re: Rendering issues
Date: 12 Jan 2008 18:07:13
Message: <47894821$1@news.povray.org>
jhu wrote:
> I'm trying to make a room with stucco by subtracting out isosurfaces. As you can
> see in this test render, in the room where the camera is located the stucco
> renderes as it should. However, the arrows pointing toward the archway show an
> area that is subtracted out but is rendering in all black. Anyone encounter
> this before with a solution?

I'm sure you have your reasons for making an entire house from 
isosurfaces! I'd like to see how this turns out :)

Could you show us your code, so we can pin down the cause of the black 
areas? The solution could be a simple thing, such as raising the 
max_gradient.

Sam


Post a reply to this message

From: jhu
Subject: Re: Rendering issues
Date: 12 Jan 2008 18:30:00
Message: <web.47894c446c6c555f7bcf5ca50@news.povray.org>
Here's the relevant code with comments. It's basically a box differenced with
other objects and isosurfaces.

  light_source{
    <0,1,0>
    White
  }
  camera {
    location <0,1.75,0>
    look_at  <0,1.75,10>
    rotate y*-12
    translate <1.75,0,-3>
    right <450/300,0,0>
  }


#declare fn_Pigm=function {
  pigment {
    agate
    color_map {
      [0 color rgb 0]
      [1 color rgb 1]
    }
  }
}

  difference{
    box{<-200,-1,-100>, <200,200,7.5>}  //the main room

    // the +z room with window
    union{
      box{<-2.5,-.001,2>, <2.5,10,6>}
      difference{ //makes the hole for the door on the +z side of the room
        #declare R=5;
        #declare H=3;
        cylinder{<0,0,5.9>, <0,0,10>, R}
        box{<-100, -100, -100>, <-1.25,100, 100>}
        box{<1.25, -100, -100>, <100,100, 100>}
        box{<-100,-100,-100>, <100, 5-H,100>}
        translate y*-R
        translate y*H
      }
    }

    //the camera room
    box{<-2.5,-.001,-9>, <5,6.0001,1.5>} // room with camera
    difference{//makes archway to connect camera room with +z room
      cylinder{<0,0,.9>, <0,0,2.1>, 2.5 translate y*1.25}
      box{<-100, -100, -100>, <100,-.0001,100>}
    }

    isosurface{//makes the camera room have stucco
      function{(y*y+x*x-2.5*2.5)-fn_Pigm(x*2, y*2, z*2).gray*0.1}
      accuracy 0.0001
      max_gradient 9
      contained_by {box {<-10,-10,.9> <10,10,2.5>}}
      translate <0,1.25,0>
      pigment{White}
    }


    isosurface{//makes the camera room have stucco
      function{max((y*y-(3*3)),(x*x-(3.75*3.75)),(z*z-(5.25*5.25)))-fn_Pigm(x*2,
y*2, z*2).gray*0.1}
      accuracy 0.0001
      max_gradient 20
      contained_by {box {-20 20}}
      pigment{White}
      translate <3.75-2.5,3.05,-(5.25-1.5)>
    }


    //the -x room
    box{<-2.49999,-.001,-9>, <2.49999,6.0001,1.5> translate x*(-5.5)}
    difference{//make the archway connecting the camera room to the -x room
      cylinder{<-5,0,0>, <-2.4,0,0>, 2.5 translate <0,1.25,-1>}
      box{<-100, -100, -100>, <100,-.0001,100>}
    }
    pigment{White}
  }


Post a reply to this message

From: nemesis
Subject: Re: Rendering issues
Date: 12 Jan 2008 22:30:00
Message: <web.4789856e6c6c555f369a31370@news.povray.org>
I can't help but ask why, why not simply normals?  it's not even a close up...

there's enough issues with coincident surfaces in plain CSG, put isosurfaces to
the mix and you're asking for trouble...


Post a reply to this message

From: jhu
Subject: Re: Rendering issues
Date: 13 Jan 2008 00:55:00
Message: <web.4789a6b16c6c555f7bcf5ca50@news.povray.org>
"nemesis" <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> I can't help but ask why, why not simply normals?  it's not even a close up...
>
> there's enough issues with coincident surfaces in plain CSG, put isosurfaces to
> the mix and you're asking for trouble...

I was intending to use isosurfaces because they should blend in better,
especially under the arch. With normals (procedural or bump_maps) there's still
a sharp demarcation between the wall and the arch.


Post a reply to this message

From: Jan Dvorak
Subject: Re: Rendering issues
Date: 13 Jan 2008 02:20:11
Message: <4789bbab@news.povray.org>
> With normals (procedural or bump_maps) there's still
> a sharp demarcation between the wall and the arch.
apply the textures after the transformations.


Post a reply to this message

From: Jan Dvorak
Subject: Re: Rendering issues
Date: 13 Jan 2008 02:42:04
Message: <4789c0cc@news.povray.org>
jhu napsal(a):
> I'm trying to make a room with stucco by subtracting out isosurfaces. As you can
> see in this test render, in the room where the camera is located the stucco
> renderes as it should. However, the arrows pointing toward the archway show an
> area that is subtracted out but is rendering in all black. Anyone encounter
> this before with a solution?
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
once I had this problem with coincident surfaces. But I can't see any in 
your code.


Post a reply to this message

From: Tim Attwood
Subject: Re: Rendering issues
Date: 13 Jan 2008 03:06:56
Message: <4789c6a0@news.povray.org>
> I'm trying to make a room with stucco by subtracting out isosurfaces. As 
> you can
> see in this test render, in the room where the camera is located the 
> stucco
> renderes as it should. However, the arrows pointing toward the archway 
> show an
> area that is subtracted out but is rendering in all black. Anyone 
> encounter
> this before with a solution?
>
Sometimes isosurfaces do that when they are used in
differences. Fortunately you can just put the differences
into the formulas for the isosurfaces...

#include "colors.inc"

global_settings {
   assumed_gamma 1
}

background{White}

light_source {
   <0,1,0>, color <1,0.9,0.7>
   fade_distance 2
   fade_power 2
}

light_source {
   <0,2.5,10>, White*0.1
   shadowless
}

camera {
   location <0,1.75,0>
   right <450/300,0,0>
   look_at  <0,1.75,10>
   rotate y*-12
   translate <1.75,0,-3>
}

#declare fn_Pigm=function {
  pigment {
    agate
    color_map {
      [0 color rgb 0]
      [1 color rgb 1]
    }
  }
};

#declare useIso = true;

union {
   // floor
   box { <-200,-100,-100>, <200,0,7.5>
      texture {
         pigment {Brown}
         finish {
            specular 0.8
            roughness 0.05
            reflection 0.1
         }
      }
   }

   // ceiling
   box { <-200,10,-100>, <200,200,7.5>
   }

   // near wall with arch
#if (useIso)
   isosurface {
      function { max( (abs(z)-0.25),
                      -min( max( (abs(x)-2.5),
                                 (abs(y+2.5)-2.5)),
                            (sqrt(pow(x,2) + pow(y,2)) - 2.5)
                          )
                    )
                 +fn_Pigm(x*2, y*2, z*2).gray*0.01 // texture
      }
      accuracy 0.001
      max_gradient 1.43
      contained_by {box {<-20,-10,-2>,<20,10,2>} }
      translate <0,1.25,1.75>
   }
#else
   difference {
      box { <-200,-10,1.5>,<200,10,2>}
      cylinder{<0,1.25,0.9>, <0,1.25,2.1>, 2.5}
      box {<-2.5,-10,0.9>,<2.5,1.25,2.1>}
   }
#end


   // left wall with arch
#if (useIso)
   isosurface {
      function { max( (abs(x)-0.25),
                      -min( max( (abs(z)-2.5),
                                 (abs(y+2.5)-2.5)
                               ),
                            (sqrt(pow(z,2)+pow(y,2))-2.5)
                          )
                    )
                 +fn_Pigm(x*2, y*2, z*2).gray*0.01
               }
      accuracy 0.001
      max_gradient 1.43
      contained_by {box {<-1,-10,-20>,<1,10,7.5>} }
      translate <-2.75,1.25,-1>
   }
#else
   difference {
      box { <-2.5,-10,-200>,<-3,10,7.5>}
      cylinder{<-5,0,0>, <-2.4,0,0>, 2.5 translate <0,1.25,-1>}
   }
#end

   // right wall
#if (useIso)
   isosurface {
      function { (abs(x)-0.25)
                 +fn_Pigm(x*2, y*2, z*2).gray*0.01
               }
      accuracy 0.001
      max_gradient 1.43
      contained_by {box {<-1,-10,2>,<1,10,7.5>} }
      translate <2.75,0,0>
   }
#else
   box { <2.5,-10,2>,<3,10,7.5>
   }
#end

   //far wall with door
#if (useIso)
   isosurface {
      function { max(
                    (abs(z)-0.5),
                    -max(
                        (sqrt(pow(x,2) + pow(y+2,2)) - 5),
                        (abs(x)-1.25)
                    )
                 )
                 +fn_Pigm(x*2, y*2, z*2).gray*0.01
               }
      accuracy 0.001
      max_gradient 1.43
      contained_by {box {<-20,-10,-1>,<20,10,1>} }
      translate <0,0,7>
   }
#else
   difference {
      box { <-200,-10,6>,<200,10,7.5>}
      //door
      difference {
         box {<-1.25,-200,5.9>,<1.25,5,10>}
         cylinder {<0,-2,5.9>, <0,-2,10>, 5 inverse}
      }
   }
#end
   texture {
      pigment {White}
      finish {
         specular 0.4
         roughness 0.05
      }
   }
}


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'iso_room.jpg' (39 KB)

Preview of image 'iso_room.jpg'
iso_room.jpg


 

From: Jan Dvorak
Subject: Re: Rendering issues
Date: 13 Jan 2008 03:08:31
Message: <4789c6ff@news.povray.org>
jhu napsal(a):
> Here's the relevant code with comments. It's basically a box differenced with
> other objects and isosurfaces.
> 
>   light_source{
>     <0,1,0>
>     White
>   }
>   camera {
>     location <0,1.75,0>
>     look_at  <0,1.75,10>
>     rotate y*-12
>     translate <1.75,0,-3>
>     right <450/300,0,0>
>   }
> 
> 
> #declare fn_Pigm=function {
>   pigment {
>     agate
>     color_map {
>       [0 color rgb 0]
>       [1 color rgb 1]
>     }
>   }
> }
> 
>   difference{
>     box{<-200,-1,-100>, <200,200,7.5>}  //the main room
> 
>     // the +z room with window
>     union{
>       box{<-2.5,-.001,2>, <2.5,10,6>}
>       difference{ //makes the hole for the door on the +z side of the room
>         #declare R=5;
>         #declare H=3;
>         cylinder{<0,0,5.9>, <0,0,10>, R}
>         box{<-100, -100, -100>, <-1.25,100, 100>}
>         box{<1.25, -100, -100>, <100,100, 100>}
>         box{<-100,-100,-100>, <100, 5-H,100>}
>         translate y*-R
>         translate y*H
>       }
>     }
> 
>     //the camera room
>     box{<-2.5,-.001,-9>, <5,6.0001,1.5>} // room with camera
>     difference{//makes archway to connect camera room with +z room
>       cylinder{<0,0,.9>, <0,0,2.1>, 2.5 translate y*1.25}
>       box{<-100, -100, -100>, <100,-.0001,100>}
>     }
> 
>     isosurface{//makes the camera room have stucco
>       function{(y*y+x*x-2.5*2.5)-fn_Pigm(x*2, y*2, z*2).gray*0.1}
>       accuracy 0.0001
>       max_gradient 9
>       contained_by {box {<-10,-10,.9> <10,10,2.5>}}
>       translate <0,1.25,0>
>       pigment{White}
>     }
> 
> 
>     isosurface{//makes the camera room have stucco
>       function{max((y*y-(3*3)),(x*x-(3.75*3.75)),(z*z-(5.25*5.25)))-fn_Pigm(x*2,
> y*2, z*2).gray*0.1}
>       accuracy 0.0001
>       max_gradient 20
>       contained_by {box {-20 20}}
>       pigment{White}
>       translate <3.75-2.5,3.05,-(5.25-1.5)>
>     }
> 
> 
>     //the -x room
>     box{<-2.49999,-.001,-9>, <2.49999,6.0001,1.5> translate x*(-5.5)}
>     difference{//make the archway connecting the camera room to the -x room
>       cylinder{<-5,0,0>, <-2.4,0,0>, 2.5 translate <0,1.25,-1>}
>       box{<-100, -100, -100>, <100,-.0001,100>}
>     }
>     pigment{White}
>   }
> 
> 
Hello again,
when I removed the stuccos the problem disappeared.


Post a reply to this message

From: jhu
Subject: Re: Rendering issues
Date: 13 Jan 2008 11:00:00
Message: <web.478a35636c6c555f7bcf5ca50@news.povray.org>
Wow! Thanks for the help and tips. That's some serious isosurface-kung-fu there.

"Tim Attwood" <tim### [at] comcastnet> wrote:


Post a reply to this message

Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 4 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.