 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Just for fun.
(thanks to Rune Johansen for the fire)
.. Bob
Should the laser beam be narrower ??
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 's1_scene_1200x675.jpg' (151 KB)
Preview of image 's1_scene_1200x675.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bob Frew <bob### [at] ntlworld com> wrote:
> Just for fun.
Heh. :) Just gotta do it sometimes.
> Should the laser beam be narrower ??
Not necessarily... but maybe redder, along with the flames.
Maybe also add a dark burn patch on the surface under the flames as well and
some smoke or absorbing media in the flames to give that sooty effect.
And if you're ambitious enough, something like:
http://www.f-lohmueller.de/pov_tut/x_sam/tec_852e.htm
for the circular blade.
Nice scorpion :) That maniac Rune would have animated the thing - with an
automated script by now... :O
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/17/19 7:32 AM, Bob Frew wrote:
Cute!
> Should the laser beam be narrower ??
Hmm, tricky. I'd say yes except you might lose some of its detail.
Is the duck the referee? :)
--
dik
Rendered 24,489,216,000 of 40,928,716,800 pixels (59%)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
hi,
Bob Frew <bob### [at] ntlworldcom> wrote:
> Just for fun.
neat, even though I'd have to like like it for my seeing my initials. :-)
those pincers are terrific, ought to be opened, a little, perhaps.
regards, jr.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 17/11/2019 12:32, Bob Frew wrote:
> Just for fun.
>
> (thanks to Rune Johansen for the fire)
> .. Bob
>
>
> Should the laser beam be narrower ??
Thanks for comments.
I forgot to credit the duck to Lutz + Kretzschmar (cica 2000) (has
featured in many of my renders - just love it)
No excuses, but the "victim" machine was a bit last minute. I like the
idea of charred surface and I agree the flame doesn't look right. The
metal would have a different colour flame (less of a wood fire) .
Will investigate the motion blur. I have a helicopter that always looks
as if it would not be in the air with the speed the rotaors appear to be
going.
... cheers Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 2019-11-17 à 07:32, Bob Frew a écrit :
> Just for fun.
>
> (thanks to Rune Johansen for the fire)
> .. Bob
>
>
> Should the laser beam be narrower ??
Narrower and brighter.
Or, same size, but with a very high density in the axis, a sharp drop
then fading to zero at the edge.
Try this :
cylindrical{colour_map{[0 rgb 0][0.97 rgb 1][0.97 rgb 20][1 rgb 100]}}
You'll need to rotate and translate so that the pattern match that laser
path.
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2019-11-17 13:32, Bob Frew wrote:
> Should the laser beam be narrower ??
Yes, definitely.
Gregor
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
> And if you're ambitious enough, something like:
> http://www.f-lohmueller.de/pov_tut/x_sam/tec_852e.htm
>
http://www.f-lohmueller.de/pov_tut/x_sam/tec_853e.htm
i went there, not how its done.
mega pov
or
3.63 (also has glow {} motion_blur {} and stereo camera)
utilities has both for 3.6 install
I dont run 3.7 for putting files in documents and F1 failure
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'not how its done.jpg' (7 KB)
Preview of image 'not how its done.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Melody" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> 3.63 (also has glow {} motion_blur {} and stereo camera)
wrong. glow {} is only megapov.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Op 20/11/2019 om 03:59 schreef Melody:
> "Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
>
>> And if you're ambitious enough, something like:
>> http://www.f-lohmueller.de/pov_tut/x_sam/tec_852e.htm
>>
> http://www.f-lohmueller.de/pov_tut/x_sam/tec_853e.htm
>
> i went there, not how its done.
> mega pov
> or
> 3.63 (also has glow {} motion_blur {} and stereo camera)
>
> utilities has both for 3.6 install
> I dont run 3.7 for putting files in documents and F1 failure
>
For your information: motion_blur has been re-introduced by Clipka in
the UberPOV version under the name Blink. See:
https://github.com/UberPOV/UberPOV/releases/
Worth a try I am sure ;-)
Now that I think of it: The best and most up-to-date Docs for all
versions of POV-Ray are those on the wiki page. See:
http://wiki.povray.org/content/Documentation:Contents
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
