On 3/2/2016 9:48 AM, Sven Littkowski wrote:
> Hi,

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'sven.png' (47 KB)

Preview of image 'sven.png'

On 2-3-2016 17:09, Bald Eagle wrote:
> Nice, Thomas   :)
> Do you have a map of sorts of Gancaloon, where all of your renders are located?
>
> It would be neat to see them all collected and "globally positioned".
>
>
>

Yes and no. I generally use an orthographic map render of the site, with 
axes and divisions to get my bearings. Generally, not everything is 
shown there, sometimes only with a simplified stand-in. This example 
dates back to 2013. While not up-to-date, it gives a fair approximation.

-- 
Thomas

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'gancaloon_07.jpg' (1256 KB)

Preview of image 'gancaloon_07.jpg'

On 3/3/2016 3:07 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
 > [ Gancaloon_07.jpg]

Your jpg is broken.  I keep trying to click on it to zoom in, like on 
the amphitheater, and nothing happens.
;)

Interesting that the city fathers built the wall so far out, lots of 
room for expansion. Yet, there appears to be no homesteaders out of the 
city.  Surely, somebody is fed up with the local political bickering and 
moves out. Or farmers.

-- 
dik

Post a reply to this message

On 3-3-2016 9:26, dick balaska wrote:
> On 3/3/2016 3:07 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>  > [ Gancaloon_07.jpg]
>
> Your jpg is broken.  I keep trying to click on it to zoom in, like on
> the amphitheater, and nothing happens.
> ;)

Have you tried a parachute? :-)

>
> Interesting that the city fathers built the wall so far out, lots of
> room for expansion. Yet, there appears to be no homesteaders out of the
> city.  Surely, somebody is fed up with the local political bickering and
> moves out. Or farmers.
>

In reality, there is a lot that needs development but it is true that 
part of the city has been abandoned, particularly at the eastern side.

-- 
Thomas

Post a reply to this message

Here's that tree I spoke about. Hard to get such a result with a tree
software.






On 02.03.2016 09:48, Sven Littkowski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I showed these trees only, because of the special shape we spoke about
> before. I wanted to show, what kind of shape I have in mind.
> 
> Besides, I didn't even know that it is possible to remove a sent
> posting. Interesting. Learned something new. Will try it out, later today.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 02.03.2016 05:19, Stephen wrote:
>> On 3/2/2016 9:23 AM, Paolo Gibellini wrote:
>>> dick balaska wrote on 02/03/2016 10.12:
>>>> On 3/2/2016 3:41 AM, Stephen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I still remember the days of dial up. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> tweeeeeeeeeet      purrrrr
>>>>        Booooooooop      ga-honk ga-honk ga-honk
>>>
>>
>> Yip! That's the one. :-)
>>
>>> Praeclara synthesis!
>>> :D
>>
>> Deep and true.
>>
>> But it did build the habit of frugality.
>>
>>

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'photo7612.jpg' (1703 KB)

Preview of image 'photo7612.jpg'

I dislike it that way, because if someone quotes the very long text of
someone else, it is a lot of scrolling until I see the new text finally.
For me, not the old text a second time is more important, but to get
right away to the new text. But i guess, that liking depends on how a
software displays the threads and postings.






On 02.03.2016 15:43, dick balaska wrote:
> On 3/2/2016 9:48 AM, Sven Littkowski wrote:
>> Hi,
> 
>

Post a reply to this message

Am 05.03.2016 um 06:01 schrieb Sven Littkowski:
> I dislike it that way, because if someone quotes the very long text of
> someone else, it is a lot of scrolling until I see the new text finally.
> For me, not the old text a second time is more important, but to get
> right away to the new text. But i guess, that liking depends on how a
> software displays the threads and postings.

While you may dislike it, it is customary here.
Which is a strong indicator that the majority of active users prefer the
reply to be below the quote.

Actually, the preferred format seems to be to interweave quotes and
replies, with the reply sections below the respective quoted sections
they refer to.

Also, long quotes are customarily trimmed down to the important portions
where applicable.

Post a reply to this message

On 3/5/2016 12:01 AM, Sven Littkowski wrote:
> I dislike it that way,

That says a lot about you.  You don't care how other people in the 
community interact; you don't listen; you don't observe.  Apparently, 
you only care how your posts appear to you.


-- 
dik

Post a reply to this message

Le 16-03-04 23:57, Sven Littkowski a écrit :
> Here's that tree I spoke about. Hard to get such a result with a tree
> software.
>
>
>
>

That tree did not grow like that by itself.
It wass trimmed several times on the street side.

Post a reply to this message

We need to avoid getting personal.

The way I see the messages of others is often this way, that I have to
scroll down long source code parts or text, before I finally reach the
part, that's interesting for me (new text). If i have ideas or
suggestions, I usually go ahead and use them, in order to show others
the ways I prefer. That has nothing to do that I don't care for others,
or that I fail to become average or a part of the majority.

I am attaching a screenshot that shows, how the posts are displayed. I
do not want to allow the Auto-Open feature (in regards to e-mail
viruses), thus this integrated view. And that shows, why I prefer older
text to be where it is not in the way for my writing.

If the need to keep old text at the top is really so strong, I will
follow these rules. It is just the more uncomfortable solution for myself.






On 05.03.2016 04:07, dick balaska wrote:
> On 3/5/2016 12:01 AM, Sven Littkowski wrote:
>> I dislike it that way,
> 
> That says a lot about you.  You don't care how other people in the
> community interact; you don't listen; you don't observe.  Apparently,
> you only care how your posts appear to you.
> 
>

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download '-1e.jpg' (396 KB)

Preview of image '-1e.jpg'