 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2014-10-13 09:53, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> It is an impressive achievement, more so even considering you did it all
> in Moray.
I'm not sure if it's stubbornness or laziness that drives me to insist
on sticking with Moray instead of learning one of the major 3D packages
that are infinitely more marketable to know how to use...
> Moray and its possible future development.
One can hope. XD
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.sjcook.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degroot org> wrote:
> It is an impressive achievement, more so even considering you did it all
> in Moray.
>
> Which - by the way - shows the capacities of Moray and its possible
> future development.
>
> Thomas
Given enough time and effort, anything can be done, as long as it's
theoretically possible. Look what s day can do with just SDL.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Reading this mesh as a mesh2 object in PoseRay, UV-mapped or not, turns
it into gibberish. Un-checking 'export as mesh2' in Moray clears up the
gibberish. This doesn't seem to apply to all mesh2s, just the one I've
spent a great many hours on.
It /renders/ just fine.
*sigh*
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.sjcook.com
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'image1a.png' (107 KB)
Preview of image 'image1a.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
When you get this kind of thing it means that something is not
consistent within the original mesh, congruent faces sharing the same
edges for example, or deprecated triangles. I don't remember if you can
search for them in Moray. In Silo, those things appear as soon as
subdivision is applied. It is then a matter of selecting the offensive
faces and trying to find the construction error.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"jhu" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>
> Given enough time and effort, anything can be done, as long as it's
> theoretically possible. Look what s day can do with just SDL.
You have guessed at my approach then, the secrent is I have a room with an
infinite number of monkeys and replaced their typewriters with PC's running POV
;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2014-10-15 02:18, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> When you get this kind of thing it means that something is not
> consistent within the original mesh, congruent faces sharing the same
> edges for example, or deprecated triangles. I don't remember if you can
> search for them in Moray. In Silo, those things appear as soon as
> subdivision is applied. It is then a matter of selecting the offensive
> faces and trying to find the construction error.
Strange that it seems to subdivide fine within Moray. Ach.
Ran into a few troubles with texturing it due to subdivision issues with
triangles, was considering rebuilding it after planning out edge loops a
little better. Should go faster second time 'round, eh?
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.sjcook.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tim Cook <z99### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> On 2014-10-15 02:18, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> > When you get this kind of thing it means that something is not
> > consistent within the original mesh, congruent faces sharing the same
> > edges for example, or deprecated triangles. I don't remember if you can
> > search for them in Moray. In Silo, those things appear as soon as
> > subdivision is applied. It is then a matter of selecting the offensive
> > faces and trying to find the construction error.
You might see if another utility can find and repair any errors in the mesh.
I'm not sure if any of the following will work, but check them out:
Gmsh
netfabb Studio
Mesh Lab
InStep
FreeCAD
Wings3D
Slic3r
Shapeways Mesh Medic
Blender
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"s.day" <s.d### [at] uelacuk> wrote:
> "jhu" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> >
> > Given enough time and effort, anything can be done, as long as it's
> > theoretically possible. Look what s day can do with just SDL.
>
> You have guessed at my approach then, the secrent is I have a room with an
> infinite number of monkeys and replaced their typewriters with PC's running POV
> ;-)
"It was the best of times, it was the... BLURST of times??? You stupid monkey!"
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"jhu" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> "s.day" <s.d### [at] uelacuk> wrote:
> > "jhu" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> > >
> > > Given enough time and effort, anything can be done, as long as it's
> > > theoretically possible. Look what s day can do with just SDL.
> >
> > You have guessed at my approach then, the secrent is I have a room with an
> > infinite number of monkeys and replaced their typewriters with PC's running POV
> > ;-)
>
> "It was the best of times, it was the... BLURST of times??? You stupid monkey!"
Ha, that is why 10,000 is not enough..
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/15/2014 02:31 PM, jhu wrote:
> "s.day" <s.d### [at] uelacuk> wrote:
>> "jhu" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>>>
>>> Given enough time and effort, anything can be done, as long as it's
>>> theoretically possible. Look what s day can do with just SDL.
>>
>> You have guessed at my approach then, the secrent is I have a room with an
>> infinite number of monkeys and replaced their typewriters with PC's running POV
>> ;-)
>
> "It was the best of times, it was the... BLURST of times??? You stupid monkey!"
>
And of course, the old OLD Bob Newhart routine, monitoring the monkey team...
"To be or not to be, that is the gugorgenplotz..."
-=- Larry -=-
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
