POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Radiosity test #2 70 kbu Server Time
1 Jun 2024 16:07:34 EDT (-0400)
  Radiosity test #2 70 kbu (Message 4 to 13 of 33)  
<<< Previous 3 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: Francois Labreque
Subject: Re: Radiosity test #2 70 kbu
Date: 7 Aug 2000 16:33:08
Message: <398F1C40.6094B12C@attglobal.net>
Gilles Tran wrote:
> 
>  [Image]

How many times must we ask you to stop posting photos?


;)
-- 
Francois Labreque | Unfortunately, there's no such thing as a snooze
     flabreq      | button on a cat who wants breakfast.
        @         |      - Unattributed quote from rec.humor.funny
  attglobal.net


Post a reply to this message

From: Steve
Subject: Re: Radiosity test #2 70 kbu
Date: 7 Aug 2000 17:19:56
Message: <slrn8ou9ll.of2.steve@zero-pps.localdomain>
All you need is a puddle of water here and there and it's real.

Looks like the sun in the late afternoon in autumn.

-- 
Cheers
Steve              email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet

%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee  0 pps. 

web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/

or  http://start.at/zero-pps

  9:02pm  up 23 days, 19:28,  2 users,  load average: 1.86, 1.91, 1.92


Post a reply to this message

From: Zeger Knaepen
Subject: Re: Radiosity test #2 70 kbu
Date: 7 Aug 2000 18:47:15
Message: <398f3c73$1@news.povray.org>
Hate to beg for the credits, but it was me who posted the remark about the
normals...
Anyway.  Very nice picture.
You make me feel jalous, although I don't know how to spell that word :-)

ZK
http://www.povplace.be.tf


Post a reply to this message

From: Margus Ramst
Subject: Re: Radiosity test #2 70 kbu
Date: 7 Aug 2000 21:44:56
Message: <398F5813.C63A3083@peak.edu.ee>
When you look at the nearby shaded surfaces (bot in this and previous), the
shading looks strange. Perhaps it's just because of the faceted texture, but
somehow it doesn't seem quite right...

-- 
Margus Ramst

Personal e-mail: mar### [at] peakeduee
TAG (Team Assistance Group) e-mail: mar### [at] tagpovrayorg


Post a reply to this message

From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: Radiosity test #2 70 kbu
Date: 8 Aug 2000 00:19:13
Message: <398F8845.96B3C11@faricy.net>
Damnit, stop, I can't compete! It's just not fair! (breaks down sobbing)

--
David Fontaine     <dav### [at] faricynet>     ICQ 55354965
Please visit my website: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/


Post a reply to this message

From: Ken
Subject: Re: Radiosity test #2 70 kbu
Date: 8 Aug 2000 01:19:48
Message: <398F969F.687E813A@pacbell.net>
Zeger Knaepen wrote:

> You make me feel jalous, although I don't know how to spell that word :-)

I spell it "envy".

-- 
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/


Post a reply to this message

From: Rick [Kitty5]
Subject: Re: Radiosity test #2 70 kbu
Date: 8 Aug 2000 14:46:33
Message: <39905589@news.povray.org>
seems your ahead of me on this rad lighting game (no surprise there then!),
will have to pinch your code and see how it works for me :)

i like the textures btw

Rick


Post a reply to this message

From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: Radiosity test #2 70 kbu
Date: 8 Aug 2000 17:23:49
Message: <39907A7C.F474ECFA@schunter.etc.tu-bs.de>
Impressive work, esp. on the textures / lighting.

IMO, the shadows the objects are casting on the ground look a bit to soft for
shadows made by direct sunlight. (maybe i'm wrong)

I wonder how it would change lighting/radiosity effects, if you use *real*
surface turbulence (isosurfaces) instead of normal statements.  

Christoph

--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
Homepage: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/


Post a reply to this message

From: Xplo Eristotle
Subject: Oh, come on, you guys...
Date: 8 Aug 2000 18:03:05
Message: <39908418.65FD9D72@unforgettable.com>
If you people don't stop kissing Gilles' ass, he's gonna get a rash.

Don't get me wrong.. he's a badass mutha and I know it as well as the
rest of you. That city pic he did for the IRTC made me weep like a
little girl. But this is NOT an awesome pic, nor does it look even
remotely photographic. It's just a radiosity test with a bunch of simple
primitives scattered around. I'll grant that it's interesting, but most
of us could probably have made it ourselves. All I'm saying is, show
some sense of perspective.

Now, Gilles, you can't keep doing this sort of thing. It's a letdown
when you create scenes that merely require human ingenuity. ;)


Post a reply to this message

From: Børge Berg-Olsen
Subject: Re: Oh, come on, you guys...
Date: 8 Aug 2000 20:31:36
Message: <3990A64C.E3CBB127@dod.no>
Xplo Eristotle wrote:
> 
> If you people don't stop kissing Gilles' ass, he's gonna get a rash.

Yeah, as he said... ;-O Anyhow, here is my radiosity test. Of course
this one use caustics and photons as well. I just wonder why it doesn't
show up. *grumble*

It's just a simple test to see if I got some caustics and reflections
showing up, but albeit no such thing. 

As usual it's a total ripoff of other peoples code, except for the
simple object.

-- 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
  +47 90 62 71 78          DoD#2101, DoDRT#017, NIC#015, PJ#006, OGM#007
  azo### [at] dodno, Ducati M600, Clementine  Ubesudlet: Aldri eid en J&%#PS.


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'radtest.jpg' (53 KB)

Preview of image 'radtest.jpg'
radtest.jpg


 

<<< Previous 3 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.