 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>All due credit to TonyB.
Wow, and on one of my images, too. :) It looks nice, doesn't it?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I concur, but did you have to use such a example image when my
eyes are already feeling the hours of sleeplessness? X-}
Bob
"Bill DeWitt" <the### [at] earthlink net> wrote in message
news:3918160e$1@news.povray.org...
|
| "Henry" <htp### [at] maccom> wrote :
| >
| > Premise: Rather than a given logo with a set colour scheme, why not an
| > _effect_ which can be bundled in an .inc and rendered into any scene?
| >
|
| That's what I was trying to say all along. -Something- that can be
| subtly introduced to each scene that will tip people off as to what they are
| looking at...
|
|
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Would you mind rendering one of these in black and white with some phong on
the black? I'm thinking that would look best with this logo, I'm but not
sure.
--
Dan D.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hey I like this one. One thing though, it looks like the C must mean
something
"TonyB" <ben### [at] panamac-comnet> wrote in message
news:39172e10@news.povray.org...
> First, off, thank you, everybody, for your suggestions. I really
appreciated
> them. :)
>
> Here's the latest version of the logo. I tried everybody's ideas, but only
> got around to implementing the following changes:
>
> a) Color-sheme
> b) Slight changes in sizes
> c) Slight change in rotation of the ellipse, to better mimic a real eye.
>
> Once again, thank you everybody for the suggestions leading to the current
> stage of the image.
>
> I'm also providing a black and white version of it, so you can get a
gander
> at that, and I also added the text "POV-Ray" so you can see what it looks
> like with it. It isn't actually part of the logo. It's only there to show
> that the logo doesn't need it, it's simply a redundant complement to those
> who know it, and it tells first-timers to what program it belongs.
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 8 May 2000 16:11:04 -0400, "TonyB" <ben### [at] panamac-comnet>
wrote:
>First, off, thank you, everybody, for your suggestions. I really appreciated
>them. :)
This is by far the best one that I have seen here! To be quite honest,
I was getting pretty sick of logos, and none of them seemed
appropriate for use - until now. This one is perfect. Can someone
announce a winner please? :)
I have even seen some of your later variations, created for Chris Huff
I believe, and this one is still better by far. I've attached a
slightly different black and white version to this message. I simply
converted your full color file to black and white, without dithering,
and this is what I got. I like it a bit better than your black and
white variation. This one still has highlights visible. Let me know
what you think of it.
Later,
Glen Berry
( Remove the "7" from 7no### [at] ezwvcom to email me. )
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'eye128_gb.jpg' (6 KB)
Preview of image 'eye128_gb.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 08 May 2000 17:01:16 -0500, Chris Huff
<chr### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
>It still looks like a hydrogen atom to me though,
I think you're the only one saying this. I never thought "hydrogen
atom" when I saw it, even though I *do* understand why you might say
that.
I appears that creating a logo everyone really likes will be only
slightly easier than achieving a sustainable cold fusion reaction.
:)
Later,
Glen Berry
( Remove the "7" from 7no### [at] ezwvcom to email me. )
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 8 May 2000 16:27:59 -0400, "TonyB" <ben### [at] panamac-comnet>
wrote:
>>The color scheme really helped. Now it's getting there!
>
>Woohoo! Uh... so what's keeping it from "being there"?
As far as I'm concerned, it *is* there.
( Remove the "7" from 7no### [at] ezwvcom to email me. )
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I *knew* someone would comment about that!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>This one is perfect. Can someone
>announce a winner please? :)
Aw, c'mon, don't exaggerate. I'm sure that there might be a better one out
there. (Please don't post it, anyone.) ;)
>I have even seen some of your later variations, created for Chris Huff
>I believe, and this one is still better by far.
Like I said, this is one variation, the other is another. It's up to you
guys to decide where this goes.
>I've attached a
>slightly different black and white version to this message.
>I like it a bit better than your black and
>white variation. This one still has highlights visible.
It does look better. I've been extracting my b&w versions from the inverse
of the alpha channel. I'll stop doing that now. :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
