Le 19-06-14 à 09:56, Bill Pragnell a écrit :
> Alain <kua### [at] videotronca> wrote:
>> Le 19-06-13 à 16:18, Bill Pragnell a écrit :
>>> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>>>> On 12-6-2019 19:05, Bill Pragnell wrote:
>>>>> "Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
>>>>>> Also, a night scene would be pretty cool.
>>>>>
>>>>> Aha, yes could be good. I'd need many lights though, which could be problematic.
>>>>> Moonlight perhaps.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Instead of lights, you can use finish {emission 1} for the window panes.
>>>
>>> Yes, and since I've been using UberPOV of late, this is probably the best
>>> solution.
>>>
>>
>> Using finish{emission 1} is not limited to UberPOV. It works very well
>> in version 3.7+
> 
> Yes, but I find decent radiosity results difficult to achieve in base POV-Ray
> without very slow renders. I think the slight graininess of Uber is a good
> trade-off for speed and zero artefacts!
> 
> 
Using importance can improve your speed.

Post a reply to this message