Friedemann:

I was wondering if you were still planning on upgrading
your excellent "Texture View" code to POV 3.1 compliance...

I tried sending you email but your stones.com address
bounces.

Dan
-- 
http://www.flash.net/~djconnel/

Post a reply to this message

>I was wondering if you were still planning on upgrading
>your excellent "Texture View" code to POV 3.1 compliance...

Thanks for asking about it :-). It's actually finished, but I still
need a little bit time for testing it. I had to implement the
possibility for changing between several POV-Ray versions and scanning
for materials.

Perhaps I'll offer an update on my homepage this night or tomorrow,
but I can't promise ;-)

Bye,
Friedemann


Friedemann Schmidt
Fri### [at] Stonescom
Raytracing-Gallery: http://www.rz.fhtw-berlin.de/~s0049669/

Post a reply to this message

I should wait until 3.1 is finished! there have been so many changes.
mick

Friedemann Schmidt <Fri### [at] stonescom> wrote in article
<35e719f7.102341@news.povray.org>...
> >I was wondering if you were still planning on upgrading
> >your excellent "Texture View" code to POV 3.1 compliance...
> 
> Thanks for asking about it :-). It's actually finished, but I still
> need a little bit time for testing it. I had to implement the
> possibility for changing between several POV-Ray versions and scanning
> for materials.
> 
> Perhaps I'll offer an update on my homepage this night or tomorrow,
> but I can't promise ;-)
> 
> Bye,
> Friedemann
> 
> 
> Friedemann Schmidt
> Fri### [at] Stonescom
> Raytracing-Gallery: http://www.rz.fhtw-berlin.de/~s0049669/
>

Post a reply to this message

>I should wait until 3.1 is finished! there have been so many changes.
>mick

You're right, but I hope the material keyword still exists and the
entries in the Windows registry are of the same type in the final
version of POV-Ray... 

Bye,
Friedemann


Friedemann Schmidt
Fri### [at] Stonescom
Raytracing-Gallery: http://www.rz.fhtw-berlin.de/~s0049669/

Post a reply to this message