In article <2u5abt03lllr7010m2hrbradddo29tjfnb@4ax.com>, Peter Popov 
<pet### [at] vipbg> wrote:

> But no_reflection also affects filtered/transmitted and refracted
> rays... I think it only checks camera rays for intersection.

Hmm...well, actually, I think this would be a bug. Does it make sense 
for "no_reflection" to make an object invisible when seen through a pane 
of glass?
Maybe separate "no_reflection" and "no_transmission" keywords 
(no_transmission would handle both filter and transmit forms of 
transparency), or maybe just "no_indirect_rays" or something.

-- 
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/

<><

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 20 Mar 2001 19:57:02 +0100, Disnel <dis### [at] itamcascz> wrote:

>> Oh, and please let us know if it works :)
>
>No, it not work :(

Well... I guess that's still something :)


Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vipbg
TAG      e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg

Post a reply to this message