 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Glen Berry wrote:
> Unless I'm mistaken, not everyone can run the MSVC compile. Doesn't
> that require a recent model of Pentium processor to work properly?
The MSVC pentium II compile can be run on any windows machine as
far as I know. I have a PI 200 mmx and it runs with no problem.
In fact even though it is optimized for a PII I still realize a
little faster performance over the watcom compile of the program.
The standard Windows distribution is compiled with watcom PII
optimized so there is little difference.
--
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
>
> PoD wrote:
>
> > I agree, how many people use the MS-DOS version?
>
> Still quite a few using it from what I have heard. Chris Colefax
> for example still uses the dos version for all of his include file
> development work.
>
OK, I didn't think that many people would be using it and I didn't mean
any offence.
However there's no reason to limit all other platforms to 8.3 filenames
anyway.
The proposal to use an #ifdef seems the best solution.
PoD.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
PoD <pod### [at] merlin netau> wrote in message
news:3922F223.BA027B9D@merlin.net.au...
> Warp wrote:
> >
> > I would suggest some #ifdef's in the povray source code. If we
are NOT
> > compiling for DOS, then just use as long file names as needed. If
we are
> > compiling for DOS, then truncate and don't care about the
consecuences.
> >
>
> I agree, how many people use the MS-DOS version?
I do for one, and my other box doesn't even have windoze installed.
I would accept Warp's suggestion though.
--
Alf
http://www.peake42.freeserve.co.uk/
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Alf_Peake/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 19 May 2000 02:14:06 +0930, PoD <pod### [at] merlinnetau> wrote:
>The proposal to use an #ifdef seems the best solution.
Yes, but which #ifdef proposal? I hope you are refering to the one
that uses #ifdef to modify the DOS version to create subdirectories,
and place sequentially numbered files into it.
There was another proposal that involved #ifdef and filename
truncation/mangling, without subdirectory creation. I don't like that
idea nearly as well.
Later,
Glen Berry
( Remove the "7" from 7no### [at] ezwvcom to email me. )
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Glen Berry <7no### [at] ezwvcom> wrote:
: Yes, but which #ifdef proposal? I hope you are refering to the one
: that uses #ifdef to modify the DOS version to create subdirectories,
: and place sequentially numbered files into it.
: There was another proposal that involved #ifdef and filename
: truncation/mangling, without subdirectory creation. I don't like that
: idea nearly as well.
I really don't care which one as long as I get long filenames here :)
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
