POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.unofficial.patches : Re: Rendering of large CT volumes Server Time
3 Sep 2024 02:14:39 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Rendering of large CT volumes (Message 1 to 2 of 2)  
From: Thomas Willhalm
Subject: Re: Rendering of large CT volumes
Date: 20 May 1999 09:46:58
Message: <qqmyaij3o3i.fsf@goldach.fmi.uni-konstanz.de>
Christian Wietholt <chr### [at] imagebienmuedu> writes:
> 
> I searched the sides to refered me to and actually found the patch, but the
> big problem is, that the patch is written for povray 3.1a and I only have
> the version 3.1e, and I could not find any version for unix between 3.02
> and 3.1e. Do you have any idea if there is such a version existing?

As far as I know, the differences between 3.1a and 3.1e are only bug 
fixes. That's why I would expect the isosurface patch to work with 
3.1e, too. Furthermore, there never existed an official unix version 3.1a.

Thomas

-- 
http://www.fmi.uni-konstanz.de/~willhalm


Post a reply to this message

From: Christian Wietholt
Subject: Re: Rendering of large CT volumes
Date: 20 May 1999 11:33:10
Message: <374420FA.A68CE2CE@image.bien.mu.edu>
Hi Thomas,

I already tried to compile the version 3.1e with the isosurface patch, and
I got tons of errors. I don't know if it is because of the different versions,
or because of some mistakes I did.

To compile povray with the patch, I copied the patch into the source
directory of povray and then I started the new version of the Makefile
inside the unix directory. Is this correct so far?

I would appreciate any help.

Thanks for your reply

    chris

> Christian Wietholt <chr### [at] imagebienmuedu> writes:
> >
> > I searched the sides to refered me to and actually found the patch, but the
> > big problem is, that the patch is written for povray 3.1a and I only have
> > the version 3.1e, and I could not find any version for unix between 3.02
> > and 3.1e. Do you have any idea if there is such a version existing?
>
> As far as I know, the differences between 3.1a and 3.1e are only bug
> fixes. That's why I would expect the isosurface patch to work with
> 3.1e, too. Furthermore, there never existed an official unix version 3.1a.
>
> Thomas
>
> --
> http://www.fmi.uni-konstanz.de/~willhalm


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.