|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Christian Wietholt <chr### [at] image bien mu edu> writes:
>
> I searched the sides to refered me to and actually found the patch, but the
> big problem is, that the patch is written for povray 3.1a and I only have
> the version 3.1e, and I could not find any version for unix between 3.02
> and 3.1e. Do you have any idea if there is such a version existing?
As far as I know, the differences between 3.1a and 3.1e are only bug
fixes. That's why I would expect the isosurface patch to work with
3.1e, too. Furthermore, there never existed an official unix version 3.1a.
Thomas
--
http://www.fmi.uni-konstanz.de/~willhalm
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Hi Thomas,
I already tried to compile the version 3.1e with the isosurface patch, and
I got tons of errors. I don't know if it is because of the different versions,
or because of some mistakes I did.
To compile povray with the patch, I copied the patch into the source
directory of povray and then I started the new version of the Makefile
inside the unix directory. Is this correct so far?
I would appreciate any help.
Thanks for your reply
chris
> Christian Wietholt <chr### [at] image bien mu edu> writes:
> >
> > I searched the sides to refered me to and actually found the patch, but the
> > big problem is, that the patch is written for povray 3.1a and I only have
> > the version 3.1e, and I could not find any version for unix between 3.02
> > and 3.1e. Do you have any idea if there is such a version existing?
>
> As far as I know, the differences between 3.1a and 3.1e are only bug
> fixes. That's why I would expect the isosurface patch to work with
> 3.1e, too. Furthermore, there never existed an official unix version 3.1a.
>
> Thomas
>
> --
> http://www.fmi.uni-konstanz.de/~willhalm
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |