POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.unix : Runing POV-Ray Server Time
28 Jul 2024 18:26:02 EDT (-0400)
  Runing POV-Ray (Message 11 to 15 of 15)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: David
Subject: Re: Runing POV-Ray
Date: 20 Nov 2000 15:52:26
Message: <B63ECF0B.30D2%davidmccabe@mac.com>
I wrote a scene file and gave it to x-povray, as you said, and it says I
have a bad INI file. What's up?
______
David McCabe
dav### [at] maccom
http://homepage.mac.com/davidmccabe/index.htm
Jesus loves you! 

> From: Remco Poelstra <rjp### [at] homenl>
> Newsgroups: povray.unix
> Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 23:27:05 +0100
> Subject: Re: Runing POV-Ray
> 
> David wrote:
> 
>> OK, well, hmm...I think perhaps there's something in all that that I can
>> understand. I'll try doing some of that stuff with the $PATH, but what even
>> does it do? Remember, I've been using Linux for three days.
> 
> Bash looks in the $PATH for the executables. So if you type 'x-povray -i
> somefile', bash looks in $PATH for the x-povray executable.
> 
> Remco Poelstra
>


Post a reply to this message

From: Ron Parker
Subject: Re: Runing POV-Ray
Date: 20 Nov 2000 16:03:42
Message: <slrn91j4dg.ccg.ron.parker@fwi.com>
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:52:27 -0800, David wrote:
>I wrote a scene file and gave it to x-povray, as you said, and it says I
>have a bad INI file. What's up?

You probably need to spend a little more time with the command-line 
reference.  My first guess would be that you forgot to type the -i.

-- 
Ron Parker   http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
My opinions.  Mine.  Not anyone else's.


Post a reply to this message

From: Steve
Subject: Re: Runing POV-Ray
Date: 20 Nov 2000 22:36:38
Message: <slrn91jrct.k3v.steve@zero-pps.localdomain>
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:52:27 -0800, David wrote:
>I wrote a scene file and gave it to x-povray, as you said, and it says I
>have a bad INI file. What's up?

Yup like Ron says I get that if I miss the -i as shown below:

[sjlen:pov]$ x-povray letters.pov
Persistence of Vision(tm) Ray Tracer Version 3.1g.Linux.gcc
  This is an official version prepared by the POV-Ray Team(tm). See the
    documentation on how to contact the authors or visit us on the
    internet at http://www.povray.org.
Copyright 1999 POV-Ray Team(tm)

INI file error.
'=' or '#' must be preceded by a keyword.[sjlen:pov]$ 

################   End of example  #####################################

Say you've got a pov file called letters.pov and you want to render it
at 800x600 with AA turned on and you want an output file of letters.ppm,
I'll demonstrate what I'd type and I'll include the command promt to 
save any confusion: 

[sjlen:pov]$ x-povray -iletters.pov -oletters.ppm -W800 -H600 +A0.3

-- 
Cheers
Steve              email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet

%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee  0 pps. 

web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/

or  http://start.at/zero-pps

  3:23am  up 41 days,  5:46,  2 users,  load average: 1.08, 1.04, 1.01


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Runing POV-Ray
Date: 21 Nov 2000 03:02:45
Message: <3a1a2c25@news.povray.org>
Steve <ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet> wrote:
: [sjlen:pov]$ x-povray -iletters.pov -oletters.ppm -W800 -H600 +A0.3

  I don't think povray automatically chooses the correct image format by
examining the output file name (if it does, then that's completely new
to me; it might be, though).
  So if povray is outputting to, for example, targa, but the filename is
'letters.ppm', you'll only get problems.
  I would just leave the -o-switch out. If I want a different output format
I would add a +f... command in 'povray.ini'.

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/


Post a reply to this message

From: samrat
Subject: Re: Runing POV-Ray
Date: 23 Dec 2000 22:02:23
Message: <3a45673f@news.povray.org>
Ron Parker wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Nov 2000 15:46:51 -0800, Scott Lambert wrote:
> >file itself. (Under Windows for example a file must be a *.EXE file,
> >there is no equivalent "permission".)
> 
> Not necessarily.  Other types of files are executable as well; most
> notably
> .BAT and .COM files.  NT even lets you specify what extensions will be
> tried; the default is
> PATHEXT=.COM;.EXE;.BAT;.CMD;.VBS;.VBE;.JS;.JSE;.WSF;.WSH
> 
i feel the same


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.