typos + poor wording. </sigh>
"jr" <cre### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> > When I say C bindings for Tk, I mean a direct interface from C to the Tk
> > library, without having to use the Tcl interpreter as an intermediate layer.
> have not done this myself but expect it to be a straightforward as using Tcl.
> (after all, developed by the same people)
as straightforward as. meant when linking to (Tcl) library, note that a subset
of functions (like memory allocator) can be used without an interpreter.
> > That's what I always do. To me, Tcl is a shell-ish scripting language.
> nor an uncommon view, I guess. the simple syntax certainly leads some to
> equate that with simple language.
not, not nor. :-)
Post a reply to this message