typos + poor wording.  </sigh>

"jr" <cre### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> > When I say C bindings for Tk, I mean a direct interface from C to the Tk
> > library, without having to use the Tcl interpreter as an intermediate layer.
>
> have not done this myself but expect it to be a straightforward as using Tcl.
> (after all, developed by the same people)

as straightforward as.  meant when linking to (Tcl) library, note that a subset
of functions (like memory allocator) can be used without an interpreter.


> > That's what I always do. To me, Tcl is a shell-ish scripting language.
>
> nor an uncommon view, I guess.   the simple syntax certainly leads some to
> equate that with simple language.

not, not nor.  :-)


regards, jr.

Post a reply to this message