 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 30.06.2015 um 09:28 schrieb Thomas de Groot:
> On 29-6-2015 21:44, LanuHum wrote:
>
>> Thomas, please check this vase in Poser.
>> This mesh2 was created by the official exporter.
>> It is important to me to know: there is a error or not?
>>
>
> Now, this is an interesting conundrum.
>
> The mesh2 geometry obviously seems corrupt when loaded in *Poseray*
> (image povwip27.jpg).
>
> However, it seems to render correctly, although extremely slow when
> rendered in *UberPOV* (image povwip27_uber.png) ;
There's a simple solution to the riddle:
It's a bug (or undocumented limitation) in PoseRay.
The official syntax of the face_indices block is as follows:
face_indices {
number_of_faces,
<index_a, index_b, index_c> [,texture_index [,
texture_index, texture_index]],
<index_d, index_e, index_f> [,texture_index [,
texture_index, texture_index]],
...
}
Apparently PoseRay stumbles over the optional texture indices.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: WIP: We check the union Blender - Povray
Date: 30 Jun 2015 07:12:24
Message: <55927998$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 30-6-2015 12:46, clipka wrote:
> Am 30.06.2015 um 09:28 schrieb Thomas de Groot:
>> On 29-6-2015 21:44, LanuHum wrote:
>>
>>> Thomas, please check this vase in Poser.
>>> This mesh2 was created by the official exporter.
>>> It is important to me to know: there is a error or not?
>>>
>>
>> Now, this is an interesting conundrum.
>>
>> The mesh2 geometry obviously seems corrupt when loaded in *Poseray*
>> (image povwip27.jpg).
>>
>> However, it seems to render correctly, although extremely slow when
>> rendered in *UberPOV* (image povwip27_uber.png) ;
>
> There's a simple solution to the riddle:
>
> It's a bug (or undocumented limitation) in PoseRay.
>
> The official syntax of the face_indices block is as follows:
>
> face_indices {
> number_of_faces,
> <index_a, index_b, index_c> [,texture_index [,
> texture_index, texture_index]],
> <index_d, index_e, index_f> [,texture_index [,
> texture_index, texture_index]],
> ...
> }
>
> Apparently PoseRay stumbles over the optional texture indices.
>
aHA! I'll file a complaint with FlyerX :-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
