|
 |
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:41:59 -0400, einarabelc5 wrote:
> Ok dude, you're right, I apologize...It was my mistake. Your last response
> has changed my mind about you.
>
> The thing Is actually I think just as you do and see that we have many
> more points in what we agree than what we do in what we disagree.
It's somewhat amazing how much similar people don't initially see how
similar they are.
> I wont
> make excuses for the stress of the work and wanting to get results ASAP,
> didn't meant to harrass no one but didn't wanted to be harrased, either. I
> just see you are Cocky but I can cope with that now, it is cool for me.
Well, I don't consider myself cocky (more "sure of myself") but no harm
done. I do understand about stress and wanting to get results as well, and
for what it's worth, my apologies to you for perhaps adding to the stress.
> My respect to you.
>
> Take care.
And to you. Enjoy the weekend.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
what a waste of space...
Anyway, einarabelc5, rendering in povray with NVidia hardware won't do you
any good, AFAIK, since povray rendering happens on the CPU.
"3D-accelerated" hardware is designed for fast pixel-fill-rates of
real-time polygonal graphics of 3D games. They are not designed for the
kinds of accurate calculations povray and most raytracers require.
Although there is ongoing work to get raytracer algorithms to be adapted to
regular 3D-boards...
today, a povray render with or without Gelato may take about the same
time...
and regarding the cartonish looks, i once saw in this thread a render in
which the guy converted from 3DMax textures to povray and it looked kinda
dumb as well. It had something to do with poor job from the converter. In
the end, Warp tweaked the textures by hand (he inverted the bumps values on
the normals or something) and it looked great.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
