On 8/8/2015 8:29 AM, LanuHum wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>> Jerome ???
> Yes! I revealed secret? Sorry!
Tut tut. ;-)
> In 'SOR:nurbs or not' clipka wrote:
>> @Jerome: Even if the implementation would be similar to that of bicubic
>> patch type 1, i.e. an internal translation to something mesh-like, so
>> that in a sense the whole job could also be done by the exporter by
>> generating a mesh2 object, I think a NURBS primitive would be beneficial
>> in order to minimize file I/O in the workflow.
> It is very good when people call each other by name.
Indeed it is. You may call me sir. </joke>
Post a reply to this message