 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
>
> It's rather easy: +a0 +r1000
>
Oh, It's even easier: +a0.3 +am2
--
Margus Ramst
Personal e-mail: mar### [at] peak eduee
TAG (Team Assistance Group) e-mail: mar### [at] tagpovrayorg
Home page http://www.hot.ee/margusrt
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: John Bauman
Subject: Re: Hackers... (Howto "not being hacked with povray")
Date: 29 Dec 2000 14:45:58
Message: <3a4ce9f6@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:3a18ffc7@news.povray.org...
> Francois Dispot <woz### [at] club-internetfr> wrote:
> : Wow, Solaris seems to be a lucky OS...
>
> The only Unix OS I have heard that crashes when it runs out of memory
> is Linux.
>
Not so much anymore. When it runs out of memory, it starts randomly killing
processes. They're working on the handling of out of memory errors for 2.4.
> --
> main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
> ):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Warp
Subject: Re: Hackers... (Howto "not being hacked with povray")
Date: 29 Dec 2000 14:53:50
Message: <3a4cebcd@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
John Bauman <bau### [at] ptdprolognet> wrote:
: When it runs out of memory, it starts randomly killing processes.
Randomly? Hopefully not processes like 'init' :)
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: John Bauman
Subject: Re: Hackers... (Howto "not being hacked with povray")
Date: 30 Dec 2000 00:20:12
Message: <3a4d708c@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:3a4cebcd@news.povray.org...
> John Bauman <bau### [at] ptdprolognet> wrote:
> : When it runs out of memory, it starts randomly killing processes.
>
> Randomly? Hopefully not processes like 'init' :)
>
Okay, semi-randomly. It would do that sometimes(I think) in older kernel
versions. Most of the time, the highest PIDs get killed first.
> --
> main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
> ):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
