My information may be pretty old (several years). Of course bugs are
fixed and features improved over the time.

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/

Post a reply to this message

Note: If the "fopen" is inside a string, it will match that too...

  Making it ignore the word "fopen" if it appears inside a string may be
a lot harder.
  It may be too risky to even try, anyways (there may be too many ways for
fooling the filter to think that the fopen is inside a string when it actually
isn't).

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/

Post a reply to this message

On 22 Nov 2000 09:14:14 -0500, Warp wrote:
>  I think that the most secure way of finding a true fopen is (using
>regular expressions):
>
>  (^|[^0-9A-Za-z])fopen($|[^0-9A-Za-z])
>
>  I think that there's a shortcut in perl for [^0-9A-Za-z] but I don't
>remember which it was.

\W


-- 
Ron Parker   http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
My opinions.  Mine.  Not anyone else's.

Post a reply to this message

Ron Parker <ron### [at] povrayorg> wrote:
:>  (^|[^0-9A-Za-z])fopen($|[^0-9A-Za-z])

: \W

  Right. The regular expression gets much simpler with that:

  (^|\W)fopen($|\W)

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/

Post a reply to this message

Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
:   (^|\W)fopen($|\W)

  Well, if we are using perl, we can simplify that even more:

  \bfopen\b

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/

Post a reply to this message

>   My information may be pretty old (several years). Of course bugs are
> fixed and features improved over the time.

I guess so...  my computer is running at 100% of CPU power since a few weeks
24/24 7/7...  And never crashed, I even used to overclock the cpu at some early
times... but I fried my 3dfx... <grin>  so got another 3dfx and stopped
overclocking...  (Celeron 433 could got up to 546mhz!!)  Actually that is not
absolutely true, I rebooted when my 30-days-of-render animation finished... to
prevent any inconvenient...  and as soon as it was ready I started another
animation... that one took only 4 days...

;)

Simon

-- 
+-------------------------+----------------------------------+
| Simon Lemieux           | Website : http://www.666Mhz.net  |
| Email : Sin### [at] 666Mhznet | POV-Ray, OpenGL, C++ and more... |
+-------------------------+----------------------------------+

Post a reply to this message

Warp wrote:
> 
>   It's rather easy: +a0 +r1000
> 

Oh, It's even easier: +a0.3 +am2

-- 
Margus Ramst

Personal e-mail: mar### [at] peakeduee
TAG (Team Assistance Group) e-mail: mar### [at] tagpovrayorg
Home page http://www.hot.ee/margusrt

Post a reply to this message

"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:3a18ffc7@news.povray.org...
> Francois Dispot <woz### [at] club-internetfr> wrote:
> : Wow, Solaris seems to be a lucky OS...
>
>   The only Unix OS I have heard that crashes when it runs out of memory
> is Linux.
>
Not so much anymore. When it runs out of memory, it starts randomly killing
processes. They're working on the handling of out of memory errors for 2.4.
> --
> main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
> ):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/

Post a reply to this message

John Bauman <bau### [at] ptdprolognet> wrote:
: When it runs out of memory, it starts randomly killing processes.

  Randomly? Hopefully not processes like 'init' :)

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/

Post a reply to this message

"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:3a4cebcd@news.povray.org...
> John Bauman <bau### [at] ptdprolognet> wrote:
> : When it runs out of memory, it starts randomly killing processes.
>
>   Randomly? Hopefully not processes like 'init' :)
>
Okay, semi-randomly. It would do that sometimes(I think) in older kernel
versions. Most of the time, the highest PIDs get killed first.
> --
> main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
> ):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/

Post a reply to this message