clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> No worse than the current SDL, and better structured - that's all I'm
> asking of a new SDL. Ideally with consistent syntax between scene
> descriptions and functions, and maybe with a rigorous enough structure
> to allow for a compiling rather than interpreting parser.
have you looked at Tcl/Tk yet, for inspiration? has many (imo) natty features,
nice, clean syntax, and byte-compiles.
Post a reply to this message